The Effect of Problem-Based Learning in Science Education on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytical Study

Ufuk Uluçınar
{"title":"The Effect of Problem-Based Learning in Science Education on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytical Study","authors":"Ufuk Uluçınar","doi":"10.33828/sei.v34.i2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This meta-analysis study aimed to scrutinize the effect of the problem-based learning (PBL) approach on students’ academic achievement in science lessons compared to the traditional instructional approach. As research data, the researcher accessed 55 experimental studies as a result of steps of a systematic review with the keywords “problem-based learning,” “science,” and “academic achievement or success” from the Education Resources Information Center, Scopus, Web of Science, Proquest, Taylor and Francis, Center of Higher Education National Thesis Center, and Wiley Online databases. The results showed that the PBL method used in science education had a high effect size on academic achievement compared to the traditional instructional method. The results also explained significant differences between the effect sizes of publication types (conference papers, articles, master’s thesis, and doctoral thesis). On the other hand, they demonstrated that academic achievement was similar in the nationality of the studies, educational levels, instructional variations with PBL, and relevant science areas. It is expected that integrating innovative instructional approaches into PBL could guide researchers who establish a research problem about how it can affect science academic achievement.","PeriodicalId":156311,"journal":{"name":"Science Education International","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Education International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v34.i2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This meta-analysis study aimed to scrutinize the effect of the problem-based learning (PBL) approach on students’ academic achievement in science lessons compared to the traditional instructional approach. As research data, the researcher accessed 55 experimental studies as a result of steps of a systematic review with the keywords “problem-based learning,” “science,” and “academic achievement or success” from the Education Resources Information Center, Scopus, Web of Science, Proquest, Taylor and Francis, Center of Higher Education National Thesis Center, and Wiley Online databases. The results showed that the PBL method used in science education had a high effect size on academic achievement compared to the traditional instructional method. The results also explained significant differences between the effect sizes of publication types (conference papers, articles, master’s thesis, and doctoral thesis). On the other hand, they demonstrated that academic achievement was similar in the nationality of the studies, educational levels, instructional variations with PBL, and relevant science areas. It is expected that integrating innovative instructional approaches into PBL could guide researchers who establish a research problem about how it can affect science academic achievement.
科学教育中基于问题的学习对学业成绩的影响:一项元分析研究
本荟萃分析研究旨在探讨基于问题的学习(PBL)方法与传统教学方法相比,对学生在科学课上的学习成绩的影响。作为研究数据,研究者以“基于问题的学习”、“科学”、“学术成就或成功”为关键词,从教育资源信息中心、Scopus、Web of science、Proquest、Taylor and Francis、高等教育中心国家论文中心和Wiley Online数据库中,通过系统综述的步骤获取了55项实验研究。结果表明,与传统教学方法相比,科学教育中使用的PBL方法对学业成绩具有较高的效应量。研究结果还解释了不同发表类型(会议论文、论文、硕士论文和博士论文)的效应值之间的显著差异。另一方面,他们证明了学术成就在研究的国籍、教育水平、PBL的教学差异和相关科学领域是相似的。期望将创新教学方法整合到PBL中,可以指导研究人员建立一个关于创新教学如何影响科学学术成就的研究问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信