Constructing Early Anglo-Saxon Identity in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicles

Courtnay Konshuh
{"title":"Constructing Early Anglo-Saxon Identity in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicles","authors":"Courtnay Konshuh","doi":"10.1163/9789004421899_009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chronicle compiled at King Alfred’s court after 891 was part of his educational reform and was also part of an attempt to create a common national identity for the English. This can be seen in the contemporary annals (i.e. from 871 to 891), but the large body of annals drawn together from diverse sources for the preceding nine centuries shows this same focus. The earlier annals, while not necessarily compiled at the same time, were selected and manipulated with the same goals, and are organised thematically into annals which explore Britannia’s roots as a Roman colony, its development as a Christian nation, and the adventus of the Germanic tribes. Barbara Yorke has shown some of these accounts to be semi-historical or mythological, but they are juxtaposed with historically accurate descriptions. While the early annals have a different compilation context than those which document Alfred’s reign, they were nonetheless selected, organised and inflated in order to legitimise the line of Cerdic and bestow authority on Alfred as well as his descendants. In this, they follow the same model as later annals in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicles.1 In light of recent research, it seems well established that the compilation of the “Common Stock” or “Alfredian Chronicle” (i.e. the annals to 891 common to most Anglo-Saxon Chronicles) was a courtly endeavour and that the exemplar for the earliest A-manuscript was a product of King Alfred’s scholarly circle.2 While Alfred’s personal involvement in this may not have been particularly large,3 the political thought of his circle of scholars can be detected throughout the annals. Annals for Alfred’s reign and for the reigns of his father and","PeriodicalId":178994,"journal":{"name":"The Land of the English Kin","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Land of the English Kin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004421899_009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The chronicle compiled at King Alfred’s court after 891 was part of his educational reform and was also part of an attempt to create a common national identity for the English. This can be seen in the contemporary annals (i.e. from 871 to 891), but the large body of annals drawn together from diverse sources for the preceding nine centuries shows this same focus. The earlier annals, while not necessarily compiled at the same time, were selected and manipulated with the same goals, and are organised thematically into annals which explore Britannia’s roots as a Roman colony, its development as a Christian nation, and the adventus of the Germanic tribes. Barbara Yorke has shown some of these accounts to be semi-historical or mythological, but they are juxtaposed with historically accurate descriptions. While the early annals have a different compilation context than those which document Alfred’s reign, they were nonetheless selected, organised and inflated in order to legitimise the line of Cerdic and bestow authority on Alfred as well as his descendants. In this, they follow the same model as later annals in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicles.1 In light of recent research, it seems well established that the compilation of the “Common Stock” or “Alfredian Chronicle” (i.e. the annals to 891 common to most Anglo-Saxon Chronicles) was a courtly endeavour and that the exemplar for the earliest A-manuscript was a product of King Alfred’s scholarly circle.2 While Alfred’s personal involvement in this may not have been particularly large,3 the political thought of his circle of scholars can be detected throughout the annals. Annals for Alfred’s reign and for the reigns of his father and
《盎格鲁-撒克逊编年史》中早期盎格鲁-撒克逊身份的建构
891年后,阿尔弗雷德国王的宫廷编年史是他教育改革的一部分,也是为英国人创造共同民族认同的尝试的一部分。这可以在当代编年史(即从871年到891年)中看到,但从不同来源收集的大量编年史在之前的9个世纪中也显示出同样的焦点。早期的编年史,虽然不一定是在同一时间编纂的,但都是为了相同的目标而被选择和操纵的,并按主题组织成编年史,探讨不列颠尼亚作为罗马殖民地的根源,作为一个基督教国家的发展,以及日耳曼部落的冒险。芭芭拉·约克(Barbara Yorke)已经证明,其中一些描述是半历史的或虚构的,但它们与历史上准确的描述并列。虽然早期编年史的编撰背景与记录阿尔弗雷德统治时期的编年史不同,但这些编年史经过精心挑选、组织和夸大,以使塞尔迪克家族合法化,并赋予阿尔弗雷德及其后代权威。在这方面,它们与后来的盎格鲁-撒克逊编年史中的编年史遵循相同的模式。1根据最近的研究,似乎可以很好地确定,“普通股”或“阿尔弗雷德编年史”(即大多数盎格鲁-撒克逊编年史共有的891年编年史)的编纂是一项宫廷努力,而最早的a手稿的范例是阿尔弗雷德国王学术界的产物虽然阿尔弗雷德个人在这方面的参与可能不是特别大,但他的学者圈子的政治思想可以在编年史中发现。阿尔弗雷德和他父亲统治时期的编年史
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信