Perspectives on computing ethics: a multi-stakeholder analysis

D. Gordon, I. Stavrakakis, John Paul Gibson, Brendan Tierney, A. Becevel, A. Curley, M. Collins, W. O'Mahony, D. O’Sullivan
{"title":"Perspectives on computing ethics: a multi-stakeholder analysis","authors":"D. Gordon, I. Stavrakakis, John Paul Gibson, Brendan Tierney, A. Becevel, A. Curley, M. Collins, W. O'Mahony, D. O’Sullivan","doi":"10.1108/jices-12-2020-0127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nComputing ethics represents a long established, yet rapidly evolving, discipline that grows in complexity and scope on a near-daily basis. Therefore, to help understand some of that scope it is essential to incorporate a range of perspectives, from a range of stakeholders, on current and emerging ethical challenges associated with computer technology. This study aims to achieve this by using, a three-pronged, stakeholder analysis of Computer Science academics, ICT industry professionals, and citizen groups was undertaken to explore what they consider to be crucial computing ethics concerns. The overlap between these stakeholder groups are explored, as well as whether their concerns are reflected in the existing literature.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nData collection was performed using focus groups, and the data was analysed using a thematic analysis. The data was also analysed to determine if there were overlaps between the literature and the stakeholders’ concerns and attitudes towards computing ethics.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results of the focus group analysis show a mixture of overlapping concerns between the different groups, as well as some concerns that are unique to each of the specific groups. All groups stressed the importance of data as a key topic in computing ethics. This includes concerns around the accuracy, completeness and representativeness of data sets used to develop computing applications. Academics were concerned with the best ways to teach computing ethics to university students. Industry professionals believed that a lack of diversity in software teams resulted in important questions not being asked during design and development. Citizens discussed at length the negative and unexpected impacts of social media applications. These are all topics that have gained broad coverage in the literature.\n\n\nSocial implications\nIn recent years, the impact of ICT on society and the environment at large has grown tremendously. From this fast-paced growth, a myriad of ethical concerns have arisen. The analysis aims to shed light on what a diverse group of stakeholders consider the most important social impacts of technology and whether these concerns are reflected in the literature on computing ethics. The outcomes of this analysis will form the basis for new teaching content that will be developed in future to help illuminate and address these concerns.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe multi-stakeholder analysis provides individual and differing perspectives on the issues related to the rapidly evolving discipline of computing ethics.\n","PeriodicalId":156416,"journal":{"name":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-12-2020-0127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose Computing ethics represents a long established, yet rapidly evolving, discipline that grows in complexity and scope on a near-daily basis. Therefore, to help understand some of that scope it is essential to incorporate a range of perspectives, from a range of stakeholders, on current and emerging ethical challenges associated with computer technology. This study aims to achieve this by using, a three-pronged, stakeholder analysis of Computer Science academics, ICT industry professionals, and citizen groups was undertaken to explore what they consider to be crucial computing ethics concerns. The overlap between these stakeholder groups are explored, as well as whether their concerns are reflected in the existing literature. Design/methodology/approach Data collection was performed using focus groups, and the data was analysed using a thematic analysis. The data was also analysed to determine if there were overlaps between the literature and the stakeholders’ concerns and attitudes towards computing ethics. Findings The results of the focus group analysis show a mixture of overlapping concerns between the different groups, as well as some concerns that are unique to each of the specific groups. All groups stressed the importance of data as a key topic in computing ethics. This includes concerns around the accuracy, completeness and representativeness of data sets used to develop computing applications. Academics were concerned with the best ways to teach computing ethics to university students. Industry professionals believed that a lack of diversity in software teams resulted in important questions not being asked during design and development. Citizens discussed at length the negative and unexpected impacts of social media applications. These are all topics that have gained broad coverage in the literature. Social implications In recent years, the impact of ICT on society and the environment at large has grown tremendously. From this fast-paced growth, a myriad of ethical concerns have arisen. The analysis aims to shed light on what a diverse group of stakeholders consider the most important social impacts of technology and whether these concerns are reflected in the literature on computing ethics. The outcomes of this analysis will form the basis for new teaching content that will be developed in future to help illuminate and address these concerns. Originality/value The multi-stakeholder analysis provides individual and differing perspectives on the issues related to the rapidly evolving discipline of computing ethics.
计算机伦理的视角:多利益相关者分析
计算机伦理学是一门建立已久,但发展迅速的学科,其复杂性和范围几乎每天都在增长。因此,为了帮助理解这一范围,有必要从一系列利益相关者的角度,对当前和新兴的与计算机技术相关的道德挑战进行整合。本研究旨在通过对计算机科学学者、ICT行业专业人士和公民团体进行三管齐下的利益相关者分析来探索他们认为至关重要的计算伦理问题,从而实现这一目标。探讨了这些利益相关者群体之间的重叠,以及他们的关注点是否反映在现有文献中。设计/方法/方法使用焦点小组进行数据收集,并使用主题分析对数据进行分析。还分析了数据,以确定文献与利益相关者对计算机伦理的关注和态度之间是否存在重叠。调查结果焦点小组分析的结果显示了不同群体之间重叠关注的混合,以及每个特定群体特有的一些关注。所有小组都强调了数据作为计算伦理的一个关键话题的重要性。这包括对用于开发计算应用程序的数据集的准确性、完整性和代表性的关注。学者们关心的是向大学生教授计算机伦理的最佳方式。业内专业人士认为,软件团队缺乏多样性导致在设计和开发过程中没有提出重要的问题。市民们详细讨论了社交媒体应用的负面和意想不到的影响。这些都是在文献中获得广泛报道的主题。社会影响近年来,资讯及通讯科技对社会及环境的影响日益显著。在这种快速增长中,出现了无数的伦理问题。该分析旨在揭示不同利益相关者群体对技术最重要的社会影响的看法,以及这些担忧是否反映在有关计算伦理的文献中。这一分析的结果将构成未来将开发的新教学内容的基础,以帮助阐明和解决这些问题。独创性/价值多利益相关者分析提供了与快速发展的计算机伦理学科相关的问题的个人和不同的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信