From Bubbles to Foam, A Nomadic Interpretation of Collaborative Publishing: A Review of Jorge Lucero and Colleagues’ Article in Art Education

Chloé Dierckx, N. Canoy, J. Schoffelen, Ellen Anthoni, Sara Coemans, Lynn Hendricks, Karmijn van de Oudeweetering, R. Segers, P. Tzouva, H. Vrebos, K. Hannes
{"title":"From Bubbles to Foam, A Nomadic Interpretation of Collaborative Publishing: A Review of Jorge Lucero and Colleagues’ Article in Art Education","authors":"Chloé Dierckx, N. Canoy, J. Schoffelen, Ellen Anthoni, Sara Coemans, Lynn Hendricks, Karmijn van de Oudeweetering, R. Segers, P. Tzouva, H. Vrebos, K. Hannes","doi":"10.18432/ari29524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review is a bricolage of nomadic encounters with Jorge Lucero and colleagues’ (2016) article on ways to engage with collaborative publishing. Lucero presents a Facebook discussion amongst practitioners denouncing the limited power of practitioners in shaping academic discourse. It shows how social media can serve as a platform for inviting the practitioner’s voice into research. The authors illustrate that by using Facebook, practitioners’ unfamiliarity and discomfort with academic standards can be bypassed. It demonstrates metalogue as a conceptual form of writing that disrupts the structure of conversations and challenges the authorial researchers’ voices. A critical note, however, is whether it is beneficial in the long term to consider the academic and social media parts as separate accounts. We argue that collaborative publishing requires collaborative research and writing in the first place. In response to the article, we started a WhatsApp conversation. This enabled us to reflect on the content of the article and experience the use of social media as a collaborative writing method ourselves.","PeriodicalId":318628,"journal":{"name":"Art/Research International: A Transdisciplinary Journal","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art/Research International: A Transdisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18432/ari29524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review is a bricolage of nomadic encounters with Jorge Lucero and colleagues’ (2016) article on ways to engage with collaborative publishing. Lucero presents a Facebook discussion amongst practitioners denouncing the limited power of practitioners in shaping academic discourse. It shows how social media can serve as a platform for inviting the practitioner’s voice into research. The authors illustrate that by using Facebook, practitioners’ unfamiliarity and discomfort with academic standards can be bypassed. It demonstrates metalogue as a conceptual form of writing that disrupts the structure of conversations and challenges the authorial researchers’ voices. A critical note, however, is whether it is beneficial in the long term to consider the academic and social media parts as separate accounts. We argue that collaborative publishing requires collaborative research and writing in the first place. In response to the article, we started a WhatsApp conversation. This enabled us to reflect on the content of the article and experience the use of social media as a collaborative writing method ourselves.
从泡沫到泡沫:合作出版的游牧式诠释——乔治·卢塞罗及其同事在《艺术教育》上的文章述评
这篇综述是对Jorge Lucero及其同事(2016)关于如何参与合作出版的文章的拼凑。Lucero在Facebook上发表了一篇实践者之间的讨论,谴责实践者在塑造学术话语方面的有限权力。它展示了社交媒体如何作为一个平台,邀请实践者的声音进入研究。作者说明,通过使用Facebook,从业者对学术标准的不熟悉和不适可以被绕过。它展示了元喻作为一种概念形式的写作,破坏了对话的结构,挑战了作者研究人员的声音。然而,一个关键的问题是,从长远来看,将学术和社交媒体部分视为单独的账户是否有益。我们认为合作出版首先需要合作研究和写作。为了回应这篇文章,我们在WhatsApp上聊了起来。这使我们能够反思文章的内容,并亲身体验使用社交媒体作为一种协作写作方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信