Using Inquiry Notebooks to Assess Critical Thinking and Writing Among Chinese English Language Learners

Kelly Wonder, Ami Christensen
{"title":"Using Inquiry Notebooks to Assess Critical Thinking and Writing Among Chinese English Language Learners","authors":"Kelly Wonder, Ami Christensen","doi":"10.37514/dbh-j.2012.9.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2001, the American Association of State Colleges and Universities partnered with the China Center for International Educational Exchange to offer dual-degree programs in which students earn degrees from “two or more partner institutions in different countries” (Helms, 2014, p. 6). These programs are also described as 1+2+1 or 2+2 programs, which refer to the years students spend in their home and host countries. Since their inception, approximately 4,000 Chinese students have earned degrees through these programs (American Association of State Colleges and Universities, 2020). While dual-degree programs promote globalization and increase opportunities for institutions, faculty, and students, challenges arise due to differences in courses, language, and culture as well as in methodologies relating to teaching, grading, and evaluation (Helms, 2014). One frequently mentioned challenge for dual-degree seekers is demonstrating critical thinking skills in their written work in American university classrooms. Upon entry to the U.S. partner institution, learners either test into an Intensive English Program, where they focus exclusively on developing English language skills, or matriculate directly into their program of study, bypassing most general education courses focused on developing critical thinking skills.","PeriodicalId":404723,"journal":{"name":"Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37514/dbh-j.2012.9.1.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2001, the American Association of State Colleges and Universities partnered with the China Center for International Educational Exchange to offer dual-degree programs in which students earn degrees from “two or more partner institutions in different countries” (Helms, 2014, p. 6). These programs are also described as 1+2+1 or 2+2 programs, which refer to the years students spend in their home and host countries. Since their inception, approximately 4,000 Chinese students have earned degrees through these programs (American Association of State Colleges and Universities, 2020). While dual-degree programs promote globalization and increase opportunities for institutions, faculty, and students, challenges arise due to differences in courses, language, and culture as well as in methodologies relating to teaching, grading, and evaluation (Helms, 2014). One frequently mentioned challenge for dual-degree seekers is demonstrating critical thinking skills in their written work in American university classrooms. Upon entry to the U.S. partner institution, learners either test into an Intensive English Program, where they focus exclusively on developing English language skills, or matriculate directly into their program of study, bypassing most general education courses focused on developing critical thinking skills.
用探究性笔记评估中国英语学习者的批判性思维和写作能力
2001年,美国州立大学协会与中国国际教育交流中心合作,提供双学位课程,学生可以从“不同国家的两个或两个以上合作机构”获得学位(Helms, 2014年,第6页)。这些课程也被称为1+2+1或2+2课程,指的是学生在本国和东道国度过的时间。自成立以来,大约有4000名中国学生通过这些项目获得了学位(美国州立大学协会,2020年)。虽然双学位课程促进了全球化,增加了机构、教师和学生的机会,但由于课程、语言和文化以及与教学、评分和评估相关的方法的差异,挑战也随之出现(Helms, 2014)。对于双学位申请者来说,一个经常被提及的挑战是如何在美国大学课堂上的书面作业中展示批判性思维技能。在进入美国合作机构后,学习者要么通过测试进入强化英语课程,在那里他们专注于发展英语语言技能,要么直接进入他们的学习计划,绕过大多数以培养批判性思维技能为重点的普通教育课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信