Knowledge in action: logico-philosophical approach to linguistic evidentiality

Log. J. IGPL Pub Date : 2019-12-13 DOI:10.1093/jigpal/jzz040
Cristina Barés Gómez, M. Fontaine, A. Nepomuceno
{"title":"Knowledge in action: logico-philosophical approach to linguistic evidentiality","authors":"Cristina Barés Gómez, M. Fontaine, A. Nepomuceno","doi":"10.1093/jigpal/jzz040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The present study focuses on a grammatical category called evidentiality. The primary meaning of evidentiality is concerned with information source. That is, it expresses whether something has been seen, heard or inferred. The aim here is to conduct a conceptual study of evidentiality in which use is made of formal tools. The fundamental intuition is that the distinction between ‘evidence’as ‘proof’and ‘evidentiality’as ‘to do with proof’is a crucial one. Evidentiality is a dynamic notion to be analysed through the use of knowledge by the agents, a knowledge in action, which involves an in-coming state and an out-coming state that is typical of the transmission of information. We propose our own approach in which the dynamics of knowledge in action is grasped in the context of a dynamic epistemic logic.","PeriodicalId":304915,"journal":{"name":"Log. J. IGPL","volume":"329 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Log. J. IGPL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzz040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The present study focuses on a grammatical category called evidentiality. The primary meaning of evidentiality is concerned with information source. That is, it expresses whether something has been seen, heard or inferred. The aim here is to conduct a conceptual study of evidentiality in which use is made of formal tools. The fundamental intuition is that the distinction between ‘evidence’as ‘proof’and ‘evidentiality’as ‘to do with proof’is a crucial one. Evidentiality is a dynamic notion to be analysed through the use of knowledge by the agents, a knowledge in action, which involves an in-coming state and an out-coming state that is typical of the transmission of information. We propose our own approach in which the dynamics of knowledge in action is grasped in the context of a dynamic epistemic logic.
行动中的知识:语言证据的逻辑哲学方法
目前的研究集中在一个被称为证据性的语法类别上。证据性的主要含义是与信息来源有关。也就是说,它表示某事是否被看到、听到或推断出来。这里的目的是对使用正式工具的证据性进行概念性研究。最基本的直觉是,“证据”作为“证明”和“证据性”作为“与证明有关”之间的区别是至关重要的。证据性是一个动态的概念,需要通过代理人对知识的使用来分析,这是一种行动中的知识,它涉及信息传递的典型的传入状态和输出状态。我们提出了我们自己的方法,在这种方法中,在动态认知逻辑的背景下掌握了行动中的知识的动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信