Evasive Maneuvers and Guerilla Tactics: A Scandinavian Institutional Perspective  on Chief Information Officer's Strategies for Legitimization

J. Magnusson, Bo Oskarsson
{"title":"Evasive Maneuvers and Guerilla Tactics: A Scandinavian Institutional Perspective  on Chief Information Officer's Strategies for Legitimization","authors":"J. Magnusson, Bo Oskarsson","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.2008.153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scandinavian institutional theory studies the travel of managerial ideas in time and space. This paper reports results from a study conducted during the summer of 2006. The study was initiated through a joint collaboration between a large management consultancy firm and the academia, and consisted of in-depth interviews with 27 chief information officers (CIOs) from large, Swedish organizations. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the strive for legitimacy as displayed by CIOs faced with norm divergence. This is done through interviews where norm divergence is induced through the use of paradoxes. As the results show, the CIOs employed a number of different strategies for legitimizing his or her organizations' particular norm divergence, ranging from evasive maneuvers to expressions of guerilla tactics. These results are discussed in relation to the implications for future studies of IT Governance practice and research design, as well as in relation to the implications for individual managers living between evasive maneuvers and guerilla tactics.","PeriodicalId":328874,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Scandinavian institutional theory studies the travel of managerial ideas in time and space. This paper reports results from a study conducted during the summer of 2006. The study was initiated through a joint collaboration between a large management consultancy firm and the academia, and consisted of in-depth interviews with 27 chief information officers (CIOs) from large, Swedish organizations. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the strive for legitimacy as displayed by CIOs faced with norm divergence. This is done through interviews where norm divergence is induced through the use of paradoxes. As the results show, the CIOs employed a number of different strategies for legitimizing his or her organizations' particular norm divergence, ranging from evasive maneuvers to expressions of guerilla tactics. These results are discussed in relation to the implications for future studies of IT Governance practice and research design, as well as in relation to the implications for individual managers living between evasive maneuvers and guerilla tactics.
回避机动和游击战术:从斯堪的纳维亚制度角度看首席信息官的合法化策略
斯堪的纳维亚制度理论研究管理思想在时间和空间上的传播。本文报告了2006年夏季进行的一项研究的结果。这项研究是通过一家大型管理咨询公司和学术界的联合合作发起的,包括对来自瑞典大型组织的27名首席信息官(cio)进行深入访谈。本文的目的是探讨首席信息官在面对规范分歧时所表现出的对合法性的追求。这是通过访谈完成的,其中规范分歧是通过使用悖论引起的。结果显示,首席信息官们采用了许多不同的策略来使其组织的特定规范分歧合法化,从规避策略到游击战术的表达。这些结果与未来IT治理实践和研究设计研究的含义有关,也与生活在规避策略和游击式策略之间的个人管理人员的含义有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信