Comparing approaches to quadrocopter control

Martin Florek, M. Huba, F. Duchoň, Jan Sovcik, M. Kajan
{"title":"Comparing approaches to quadrocopter control","authors":"Martin Florek, M. Huba, F. Duchoň, Jan Sovcik, M. Kajan","doi":"10.1109/RAAD.2014.7002241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper compares three approaches on a quadrocopter orientation and altitude control: the most frequently used PD and PID control, the Integral Backstepping methods and a nonlinear decomposition control. All these methods are verified and evaluated by simulation. The whole proposal was applied in Matlab with the described nonlinear model. The comparison shows that PD and PID control has the slowest entire controlling and has second the highest energy efficiency. The integral backstepping method has the fastest altitude control and the advantage was the highest energy efficiency. The method of nonlinear decomposition was the fastest when controlling the orientation (pitch, roll and yaw). The work offers a basis to physical realization and application of the designed control that will be carried out in the next phase.","PeriodicalId":205930,"journal":{"name":"2014 23rd International Conference on Robotics in Alpe-Adria-Danube Region (RAAD)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 23rd International Conference on Robotics in Alpe-Adria-Danube Region (RAAD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAAD.2014.7002241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The present paper compares three approaches on a quadrocopter orientation and altitude control: the most frequently used PD and PID control, the Integral Backstepping methods and a nonlinear decomposition control. All these methods are verified and evaluated by simulation. The whole proposal was applied in Matlab with the described nonlinear model. The comparison shows that PD and PID control has the slowest entire controlling and has second the highest energy efficiency. The integral backstepping method has the fastest altitude control and the advantage was the highest energy efficiency. The method of nonlinear decomposition was the fastest when controlling the orientation (pitch, roll and yaw). The work offers a basis to physical realization and application of the designed control that will be carried out in the next phase.
比较方法的四旋翼飞行器控制
本文比较了四旋翼飞行器方向和高度控制的三种方法:最常用的PD和PID控制、积分反演方法和非线性分解控制。通过仿真对这些方法进行了验证和评价。利用所描述的非线性模型,在Matlab中对整个方案进行了应用。对比表明,PD和PID控制的整体控制速度最慢,能效第二高。积分反演法的高度控制速度最快,且能量效率最高。在控制飞行器的俯仰、横摇和偏航方向时,非线性分解方法的速度最快。该工作为下一阶段所设计控制的物理实现和应用奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信