Progressive Collapse Evaluation of Low-Rise Reinforced Concrete Buildings Designed for Different Occupancy Classes

Aydin Demir
{"title":"Progressive Collapse Evaluation of Low-Rise Reinforced Concrete Buildings Designed for Different Occupancy Classes","authors":"Aydin Demir","doi":"10.54203/jceu.2022.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to investigate the progressive collapse behavior of low-rise reinforced concrete buildings designed for different occupancy classes. For this objective, two low-rise reinforced concrete framed buildings were designed independently according to the Turkish Seismic Code for Buildings by considering the Residential Occupancy Class and Government Buildings Occupancy Class. A nonlinear dynamic analysis method was employed to evaluate the progressive collapse response of the buildings by using the alternate path direct design approach of UFC 4-023-03 and GSA-2016 guidelines. Three-dimensional finite element models were created for the analyses, and fiber hinges were used to represent the nonlinear behavior of the load-bearing members. Three column loss scenarios were implemented independently. The analysis results show that the residual displacement of the residential building is higher than that of the government building in all column removal scenarios. Moreover, the damage conditions of the residential building are commonly worse than the government building for all column loss scenarios. It is deduced from the study that the buildings experienced the most severe local damage, disproportionate to the initial failure, under the inner column loss scenario","PeriodicalId":151760,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Engineering and Urbanism","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Engineering and Urbanism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54203/jceu.2022.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aims to investigate the progressive collapse behavior of low-rise reinforced concrete buildings designed for different occupancy classes. For this objective, two low-rise reinforced concrete framed buildings were designed independently according to the Turkish Seismic Code for Buildings by considering the Residential Occupancy Class and Government Buildings Occupancy Class. A nonlinear dynamic analysis method was employed to evaluate the progressive collapse response of the buildings by using the alternate path direct design approach of UFC 4-023-03 and GSA-2016 guidelines. Three-dimensional finite element models were created for the analyses, and fiber hinges were used to represent the nonlinear behavior of the load-bearing members. Three column loss scenarios were implemented independently. The analysis results show that the residual displacement of the residential building is higher than that of the government building in all column removal scenarios. Moreover, the damage conditions of the residential building are commonly worse than the government building for all column loss scenarios. It is deduced from the study that the buildings experienced the most severe local damage, disproportionate to the initial failure, under the inner column loss scenario
不同使用等级下低层钢筋混凝土建筑的连续倒塌评价
本研究旨在探讨不同使用等级的低层钢筋混凝土建筑的渐进倒塌行为。为此,考虑到住宅使用等级和政府建筑使用等级,根据土耳其建筑抗震规范独立设计了两座低层钢筋混凝土框架建筑。采用UFC 4-023-03和GSA-2016指南的交替路径直接设计方法,采用非线性动力分析方法对建筑物的渐进倒塌响应进行评价。建立了三维有限元模型进行分析,并采用纤维铰链来表示承重构件的非线性行为。三个柱损场景分别独立实现。分析结果表明,在所有拆柱场景下,住宅楼的剩余位移均高于政府大楼。此外,在各种柱损情况下,住宅楼的破坏情况通常比政府大楼更严重。研究结果表明,在内柱损失情况下,建筑物遭受的局部破坏最严重,与初始破坏不成比例
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书