Fællessang som samklingende eufori eller social dissonans

Nanna Cæcilie Thrane
{"title":"Fællessang som samklingende eufori eller social dissonans","authors":"Nanna Cæcilie Thrane","doi":"10.7146/sang.v2i1-2.137221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Group Singing as Harmonic Euphoria or Social Dissonance \nGroup singing is in general tributed for its ability to promote wellbeing, different aspects of health, feelings of cohesion, and educative potentials. Now and then this perspective seems to overrule the fact that every group singing event is unique and dependent on who and in what way people takes part in it. This article explores how group singing varies depending on social interaction. Based on a multi-sited ethnographic fieldwork, which among other places was carried out at a Danish bording school and with a gospel choir, different kinds of social interaction in group singing events are analyzed. The article finds that the interaction is sometimes dominated by divergence in behavior, participation and attitude, and sometimes by simultaneousness, harmony and euphoria. Moreover, the article illustrates how the interplay can be seen as inhibited by embarrassment, which might occur as a leak of different sets of values: the value of group singing as boring and old-fashioned and the value of group singing as funny and successful. By extension it illustrates how different strategies are used to avoid embarrassment in the interplay. The article contributes with a notion of group singing as a complex and ambiguous social phenomenon which depends on the people present and the context in which it occurs.","PeriodicalId":292790,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskriftet SANG","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskriftet SANG","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/sang.v2i1-2.137221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Group Singing as Harmonic Euphoria or Social Dissonance Group singing is in general tributed for its ability to promote wellbeing, different aspects of health, feelings of cohesion, and educative potentials. Now and then this perspective seems to overrule the fact that every group singing event is unique and dependent on who and in what way people takes part in it. This article explores how group singing varies depending on social interaction. Based on a multi-sited ethnographic fieldwork, which among other places was carried out at a Danish bording school and with a gospel choir, different kinds of social interaction in group singing events are analyzed. The article finds that the interaction is sometimes dominated by divergence in behavior, participation and attitude, and sometimes by simultaneousness, harmony and euphoria. Moreover, the article illustrates how the interplay can be seen as inhibited by embarrassment, which might occur as a leak of different sets of values: the value of group singing as boring and old-fashioned and the value of group singing as funny and successful. By extension it illustrates how different strategies are used to avoid embarrassment in the interplay. The article contributes with a notion of group singing as a complex and ambiguous social phenomenon which depends on the people present and the context in which it occurs.
集体歌唱通常被认为具有促进幸福、健康的不同方面、凝聚力和教育潜力的能力。有时,这种观点似乎否定了这样一个事实,即每个集体歌唱活动都是独特的,取决于人们参与的对象和方式。这篇文章探讨了群体歌唱是如何根据社会互动而变化的。本文通过对丹麦一所寄宿学校和一个福音唱诗班进行的多地点民族志田野调查,分析了群体歌唱活动中不同类型的社会互动。研究发现,这种互动有时是由行为、参与和态度的差异主导的,有时是由同时性、和谐性和欣赏性主导的。此外,这篇文章还说明了这种相互作用是如何被尴尬所抑制的,这可能是不同价值观的泄漏:集体歌唱的价值是无聊和过时的,集体歌唱的价值是有趣和成功的。通过扩展,它说明了如何使用不同的策略来避免相互作用中的尴尬。这篇文章提出了一个观点,即集体歌唱是一种复杂而模糊的社会现象,它取决于在场的人和它发生的背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信