Routine clinical use of Electronic Monitoring Devices (EMD) to measure inhaler adherence in children with Difficult Asthma (DA)

S. Frost, J. Bennett, B. Davies, Isobel Brookes, P. Kenia, S. Rao, P. Nagakumar
{"title":"Routine clinical use of Electronic Monitoring Devices (EMD) to measure inhaler adherence in children with Difficult Asthma (DA)","authors":"S. Frost, J. Bennett, B. Davies, Isobel Brookes, P. Kenia, S. Rao, P. Nagakumar","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa5427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Poor adherence to inhaled steroids is a well-recognised factor for poor asthma control. Although use of EMDs to assess adherence is advocated by BTS-SIGN asthma guidelines, their use has been predominantly within research studies (Chan: 2015). Moreover, most commercially available EMD’s in children do not measure the actuation of the drug. A retrospective analysis of the data from EMD monitoring (Smartinhaler®) over a 2 year period was reviewed to asscertain experience of the use of EMD’s to measure inhaled steroid adherence within routine clinical settings. All patients were attending the regional paediatric DA service, on high dose asthma therapies, & for consideration of novel therapies. 40 patients were monitored at median age 12. 7 yr (range 7, 16 yr). The median duration of monitoring = 2.1 month (range 1, 6months). The FEV1 at the start of the monitoring = 84% (range 45, 109%). 23 (57.5%) had adherence In 17 (42.5%) patients, EMD data showed adherence >80%. Further data analysis showed possible poor inhaler technique in 7/17 patients. Only 10 (23.8%) children showed adherence >80% & apparent good inhaler technique. The FEV1 improved by 4.8% (p=0.2) during the monitoring period. Also 3 of the young people wished to continue the use of EDM. Smartinhaler® can be used in routine clinical practice to objectively assess adherence in paediatric DA patients. Clinicians should be aware that the device stores data that can uncover poor inhaler technique/ repeated actuations, providing valuable information for tailoring interventions to patients. The role of EMDs regular clinical practice as a strong monitoring tool needs further exploration.","PeriodicalId":114886,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric asthma and allergy","volume":"44 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric asthma and allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa5427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Poor adherence to inhaled steroids is a well-recognised factor for poor asthma control. Although use of EMDs to assess adherence is advocated by BTS-SIGN asthma guidelines, their use has been predominantly within research studies (Chan: 2015). Moreover, most commercially available EMD’s in children do not measure the actuation of the drug. A retrospective analysis of the data from EMD monitoring (Smartinhaler®) over a 2 year period was reviewed to asscertain experience of the use of EMD’s to measure inhaled steroid adherence within routine clinical settings. All patients were attending the regional paediatric DA service, on high dose asthma therapies, & for consideration of novel therapies. 40 patients were monitored at median age 12. 7 yr (range 7, 16 yr). The median duration of monitoring = 2.1 month (range 1, 6months). The FEV1 at the start of the monitoring = 84% (range 45, 109%). 23 (57.5%) had adherence In 17 (42.5%) patients, EMD data showed adherence >80%. Further data analysis showed possible poor inhaler technique in 7/17 patients. Only 10 (23.8%) children showed adherence >80% & apparent good inhaler technique. The FEV1 improved by 4.8% (p=0.2) during the monitoring period. Also 3 of the young people wished to continue the use of EDM. Smartinhaler® can be used in routine clinical practice to objectively assess adherence in paediatric DA patients. Clinicians should be aware that the device stores data that can uncover poor inhaler technique/ repeated actuations, providing valuable information for tailoring interventions to patients. The role of EMDs regular clinical practice as a strong monitoring tool needs further exploration.
临床常规使用电子监测装置(EMD)测量难治性哮喘患儿吸入器依从性
吸入类固醇依从性差是哮喘控制不佳的一个公认因素。尽管BTS-SIGN哮喘指南提倡使用emd来评估依从性,但它们的使用主要是在研究中(Chan: 2015)。此外,大多数市售的儿童EMD不测量药物的驱动作用。回顾性分析了EMD监测(Smartinhaler®)2年期间的数据,以确定在常规临床环境中使用EMD来测量吸入类固醇依从性的某些经验。所有患者均参加地区儿科DA服务,接受大剂量哮喘治疗,并考虑采用新疗法。40例患者的中位年龄为12岁。7年(7 - 16年)。中位监测时间为2.1个月(范围为1 ~ 6个月)。监测开始时的FEV1 = 84%(范围45,109%)。在17例(42.5%)患者中,EMD数据显示依从性>80%。进一步的数据分析显示,7/17例患者可能吸入器技术不佳。只有10名(23.8%)患儿依从性>80%,吸入器技术明显良好。监测期间FEV1改善4.8% (p=0.2)。还有3名年轻人希望继续使用电火花加工。Smartinhaler®可用于常规临床实践,客观评估儿科DA患者的依从性。临床医生应该意识到,该设备存储的数据可以揭示吸入器技术不良/重复驱动,为患者量身定制干预措施提供有价值的信息。emd作为常规临床实践强有力的监测工具的作用有待进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信