Educators' Perceptions and Documentation of Testing Accommodations for Students with Disabilities

Aleta A. Gilbertson Schulte, S. Elliott, T. Kratochwill
{"title":"Educators' Perceptions and Documentation of Testing Accommodations for Students with Disabilities","authors":"Aleta A. Gilbertson Schulte, S. Elliott, T. Kratochwill","doi":"10.1300/J008v16n01_03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Many educators have limited experience in planning and using testing accommodations for state and/or district testing. Recent changes in federal and state laws have confronted many educators with the requirement of using accommodations for students with disabilities in efforts to include them in assessments. This two-part investigation focused on educators' use of the Assessment Accommodation Checklist (AAC) (Elliott, Kratochwill, & Schulte, 1996) to facilitate selection of assessment accommodations for two hypothetical students with disabilities who are taking either a test featuring multiple-choice items or performance tasks. The volunteer participants in this study included 92 educators from Wisconsin and 26 state-level educational leaders from across the United States. Results suggested that educators do not recommend significantly more accommodations for use with a student with a severe disability than a student with a more mild disability. However, educators recommended significantly more accommodations for use on a performance assessment task than on multiple-choice assessment tasks and rated one of the AAC categories, Providing Assistance During Administration, as more helpful and fair on the performance assessment task than on the multiple-choice tasks. Results also indicated educators rated the AAC as possessing good content validity. Furthermore, the educators implied the AAC is useful for generating ideas and documenting accommodations used for students with disabilities. The results of this study have implications for the participation of students with disabilities in large-scale assessments now required in many states and school districts.","PeriodicalId":287957,"journal":{"name":"Special services in the schools","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Special services in the schools","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J008v16n01_03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Abstract Many educators have limited experience in planning and using testing accommodations for state and/or district testing. Recent changes in federal and state laws have confronted many educators with the requirement of using accommodations for students with disabilities in efforts to include them in assessments. This two-part investigation focused on educators' use of the Assessment Accommodation Checklist (AAC) (Elliott, Kratochwill, & Schulte, 1996) to facilitate selection of assessment accommodations for two hypothetical students with disabilities who are taking either a test featuring multiple-choice items or performance tasks. The volunteer participants in this study included 92 educators from Wisconsin and 26 state-level educational leaders from across the United States. Results suggested that educators do not recommend significantly more accommodations for use with a student with a severe disability than a student with a more mild disability. However, educators recommended significantly more accommodations for use on a performance assessment task than on multiple-choice assessment tasks and rated one of the AAC categories, Providing Assistance During Administration, as more helpful and fair on the performance assessment task than on the multiple-choice tasks. Results also indicated educators rated the AAC as possessing good content validity. Furthermore, the educators implied the AAC is useful for generating ideas and documenting accommodations used for students with disabilities. The results of this study have implications for the participation of students with disabilities in large-scale assessments now required in many states and school districts.
教育工作者对残疾学生考试便利的看法和记录
许多教育工作者在规划和使用州和/或地区考试设施方面的经验有限。最近联邦和州法律的变化使许多教育工作者面临着为残疾学生提供便利以将他们纳入评估的要求。这个由两部分组成的调查侧重于教育工作者使用评估便利清单(AAC) (Elliott, Kratochwill, & Schulte, 1996)来帮助两个假设的残疾学生选择评估便利,他们要么参加以多项选择项目为特征的测试,要么参加表演任务。这项研究的志愿者参与者包括来自威斯康星州的92名教育工作者和来自美国各地的26名州级教育领导人。结果表明,教育工作者并没有建议为重度残疾学生提供比轻度残疾学生更多的便利设施。然而,教育工作者建议在绩效评估任务中比在多项选择任务中使用更多的便利条件,并认为其中一个AAC类别,在管理期间提供协助,在绩效评估任务中比在多项选择任务中更有帮助和公平。结果还显示,教育工作者认为AAC具有良好的内容效度。此外,教育工作者暗示AAC对于产生想法和记录残疾学生的住宿是有用的。这项研究的结果对残疾学生参与目前在许多州和学区要求的大规模评估具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信