Early results of laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in rectal cancer surgery

H. Duc
{"title":"Early results of laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in rectal cancer surgery","authors":"H. Duc","doi":"10.51199/vjsel.2019.4.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\n\nIntroduction: There are controversies over the treatment options for pelvic lymph node metastasis in low rectal cancer. The role of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in radical treatment of pelvic lymph node metastasis is still unidentified. Total mesorectal excision (TME) with Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) provides lower pelvic recurrence in 5 years than TME only.\n\nMaterial and Methods: Prospective, uncontrolled clinical trial for patients with low rectal cancer (below peritoneal fold), who had suspected lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis on MRI scan and the patients did not have contraindication for laparoscopic surgery.\n\nResult: From January 2017 to February 2018 we performed 12 cases of LPLND. There was no con-version to open surgery. The average time for lymphadenectomy is 75 minutes with an average amount of blood loss of 97ml. Only 1 case had postoperative urinary retention (8%). The rate of pos-itive pelvic node was 5.8%, with an average of resected nodes of 4.9 nodes. Lymph nodes size on MRI scan in the positive pelvic node group was 20.6mm, compared to 7mm in the negative group.\n\nConclusion: Laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection is a feasible and safe technique and should be done by experienced colorectal surgeons. Aging, female sex and pelvic lymph node size on MRI are related to pelvic lymph node metastasis.","PeriodicalId":199241,"journal":{"name":"Vietnam Journal of Endolaparoscopic Surgery","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vietnam Journal of Endolaparoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51199/vjsel.2019.4.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: There are controversies over the treatment options for pelvic lymph node metastasis in low rectal cancer. The role of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in radical treatment of pelvic lymph node metastasis is still unidentified. Total mesorectal excision (TME) with Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) provides lower pelvic recurrence in 5 years than TME only. Material and Methods: Prospective, uncontrolled clinical trial for patients with low rectal cancer (below peritoneal fold), who had suspected lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis on MRI scan and the patients did not have contraindication for laparoscopic surgery. Result: From January 2017 to February 2018 we performed 12 cases of LPLND. There was no con-version to open surgery. The average time for lymphadenectomy is 75 minutes with an average amount of blood loss of 97ml. Only 1 case had postoperative urinary retention (8%). The rate of pos-itive pelvic node was 5.8%, with an average of resected nodes of 4.9 nodes. Lymph nodes size on MRI scan in the positive pelvic node group was 20.6mm, compared to 7mm in the negative group. Conclusion: Laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection is a feasible and safe technique and should be done by experienced colorectal surgeons. Aging, female sex and pelvic lymph node size on MRI are related to pelvic lymph node metastasis.
腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术在直肠癌手术中的早期效果
摘要简介:低位直肠癌盆腔淋巴结转移的治疗方案存在争议。新辅助放疗在盆腔淋巴结转移根治性治疗中的作用尚不明确。全肠系膜切除(TME)联合腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫(LPLND)在5年内比单纯的TME更低的盆腔复发率。材料与方法:前瞻性、非对照临床试验,研究对象为MRI扫描怀疑盆腔外侧淋巴结转移且无腹腔镜手术禁忌症的低位直肠癌(腹膜襞以下)患者。结果:2017年1月至2018年2月共行LPLND 12例。没有转到开腹手术。淋巴结切除术平均时间75分钟,平均失血量97ml。术后尿潴留1例(8%)。盆腔淋巴结阳性率为5.8%,平均切除4.9个。盆腔淋巴结阳性组MRI扫描淋巴结大小为20.6mm,阴性组为7mm。结论:腹腔镜盆腔外侧淋巴结清扫术是一种安全可行的技术,应由经验丰富的结直肠外科医生进行。年龄、女性、MRI上盆腔淋巴结大小与盆腔淋巴结转移有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信