Evaluation of digital text book vs. print text book learning perceptions among dental students during covid-19. A questionnaire study

Yasaswi Ponukupati, Swetha P, Ravikanth M
{"title":"Evaluation of digital text book vs. print text book learning perceptions among dental students during covid-19. A questionnaire study","authors":"Yasaswi Ponukupati, Swetha P, Ravikanth M","doi":"10.53274/ijcrd.2021.2101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Evaluation of digital text books vs. print text book learning perception levels among the students of Vishnu dental college during COVID 19. A questionnaire study. \nObjectives: \n \nTo evaluate the perception levels of E-Book and Text Book learning among students of Vishnu dental college. \nTo assess the mental attitudes of students in E-Book and Text Book learning \n \nKey words: E-books, text-books, perception levels, efficacy, dental students, students. \nIntroduction: Textbooks have been a guide since education had stepped into this world. Even if we turn our pages back to ancient-times we come across inscriptions made on leaves, rocks, sculptures, and many more, from there the ideology of writing got started which led to printed books. In the mid-1970s ever since the age of digitalization has started the evolution of textbooks took place which gave birth to e-books. \n           E-learning has transformed into various forms such as tablets, I-pads, kindle and became a fast-growing technology in no time. Considering various factors like cost, accessibility, maintenance, and eco-friendly there was a gradual decline in conventional reading which led to the downfall of many book stores that made them shut their doors and get exhausted. But ultimately it is not only the devices or the technology that evolved, either people have too. So, in this lockdown, many students got introduced to e-reading for their preparation to get done. \n  Taking this as an opportunity our present study is an attempt to find out which type of learning has the better efficiency and intellectuality over the other. \nMaterials and Methodology:  A questionnaire study was done on the 1st bds students who have recently completed their university examinations irrespective of gender and age. All the study participants voluntarily completed the questionnaire consisting of 10 questions which was validated by the institutional ethics committee of Vishnu dental college with ref no IEVDC/2021/UGD1/OP/Q/65. The students other than 1st bds were excluded from this study. This questionnaire was based on various aspects related to both text book and e book. test-retest reliability was conducted and the Cronbach’s alpha (?) value was found to be 0.83. for every response the options were ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Data was collected via google forms and statistical analysis for knowledge, awareness were computed and results obtained. \nData management was performed by using simple bar and pie charrs with percentage (%). \nQUESTIONNAIRE: \n  \n \nTextbook reading improvises your memory when compared to e books \neBooks reading cause s shifting of focus when compared to textbooks (notifications, calls, messages) \nIncreased screen time in reading e books may lead to adverse health effects (eye defects, headache etc.) \nE-reading helps in quick revision of the content \nPreparation with e-books consumes more time \nContent sharing is easy by e-books than text books \nTextbooks are more economical than e-books (one device many books) \nE-books have augmented reality experience when compared to textbooks (animated and graphic contents) \nTextbooks are easily available than e-books \n \n  \n \nWhat are your opinions/views about the choice of reading in future? \n \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \nResults: \n  \n1st Bds students who recently appeared for their university examinations were provided a validated questionnaire and their responses were assessed and displayed in a bar graph: \n \n75% students say that they absorb more information when they read Text Books when compared to E- books. \n78% students infer that they get distracted while they use E-Books. \n62% students strongly agree that screen time may be health hazardous (headache and eye strain) when compared to Text Book reading. \n75% students agree that E-books help in quick revision than the Text Books. \nInterestingly here the availability of either E-Books or Text Books was equally voted which indicates the advancement of digitalization. \n88% of the students prefer E-Books rather than Text Books as their content sharing is fast and easier. \n \nDiscussion:                                                \n  \nThis comparison of student preferences and use of e books had shown up many important findings. there were no age and gender factors involving in the study [3]. It was also interesting regarding the availability of the E and TEXT books which were equally voted that indicated a greater amount of digitalization going round the world.in regard of the comments given by the study participants previous use of e books doesn’t increase the preference for it.[1] the students were in search of the means through which they could achieve their best output. \n  \nBy grouping all the elements given in the questionnaire it is able to find out that there was no actual difference between e books and text books. perhaps the reason for the low percentage is because of the different ways of getting adapted to either of the means according to their compatibility. \n  \nApart from these, the advantages and disadvantages of either the segments were also included in this study. \n  \nText books help to increase our memory, they get less distracted, and they’re easy on eyes, \nNo need of current and batteries and it’s great for notes taking. But, on the other side of the coin they’re a bit non ecofriendly, can’t be carried everywhere and their maintenance is a tedious process.[4] \nE-books are like one device many books, they’re easily accessible, they act as a quick guide, they’re eco-friendly and maintained freely. On the other hand, they’re distracting, health hazardous, can’t be afforded by everyone and require electricity and batteries. \nConclusion: \n  \n In this fast-growing world, the technology is drifting us towards its digitalization but, it doesn’t mean to leave our roots. Obviously, it depends from person’s interest; ultimately the one who makes up the best choice will get the best output. A person should always have a caution in his mind whether the technology codes our mind or we code the technology. We should also give some concern to divide the attention between a pixel and ink. Finally, when it comes to intensively reading long pieces of plain text, paper and ink may still have the advantage. But text is not the only way to read. So, in this study many of the participants were abruptly sent home because of the pandemic and lockdown. This led to the shortage of text books which made them to get adapted to e learning. Considering both their experiences 78% of the students voted for text books and 28% voted for e books.  \nReferences: \n \nGeethika B, Karpagam K. Comparing the choice of Ebooks Vs Textbooks among dental students-A Questionnaire based study. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016 Aug 1;9(8):1077. \nZhang Y, Kudva S. E?books versus print books: Readers' choices and preferences across contexts. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2014 Aug;65(8):1695-706. \nWoody WD, Daniel DB, Baker CA. E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & education. 2010 Nov 1;55(3):945-8. \nEngbrecht JR. Digital textbooks versus print textbooks. \nJabr F. The reading brain in the digital age: The science of paper versus screens. Scientific American. 2013 Apr 11;11(5).","PeriodicalId":300082,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Clinical Research in Dentistry","volume":"183 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Clinical Research in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53274/ijcrd.2021.2101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Evaluation of digital text books vs. print text book learning perception levels among the students of Vishnu dental college during COVID 19. A questionnaire study. Objectives: To evaluate the perception levels of E-Book and Text Book learning among students of Vishnu dental college. To assess the mental attitudes of students in E-Book and Text Book learning Key words: E-books, text-books, perception levels, efficacy, dental students, students. Introduction: Textbooks have been a guide since education had stepped into this world. Even if we turn our pages back to ancient-times we come across inscriptions made on leaves, rocks, sculptures, and many more, from there the ideology of writing got started which led to printed books. In the mid-1970s ever since the age of digitalization has started the evolution of textbooks took place which gave birth to e-books.            E-learning has transformed into various forms such as tablets, I-pads, kindle and became a fast-growing technology in no time. Considering various factors like cost, accessibility, maintenance, and eco-friendly there was a gradual decline in conventional reading which led to the downfall of many book stores that made them shut their doors and get exhausted. But ultimately it is not only the devices or the technology that evolved, either people have too. So, in this lockdown, many students got introduced to e-reading for their preparation to get done.   Taking this as an opportunity our present study is an attempt to find out which type of learning has the better efficiency and intellectuality over the other. Materials and Methodology:  A questionnaire study was done on the 1st bds students who have recently completed their university examinations irrespective of gender and age. All the study participants voluntarily completed the questionnaire consisting of 10 questions which was validated by the institutional ethics committee of Vishnu dental college with ref no IEVDC/2021/UGD1/OP/Q/65. The students other than 1st bds were excluded from this study. This questionnaire was based on various aspects related to both text book and e book. test-retest reliability was conducted and the Cronbach’s alpha (?) value was found to be 0.83. for every response the options were ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Data was collected via google forms and statistical analysis for knowledge, awareness were computed and results obtained. Data management was performed by using simple bar and pie charrs with percentage (%). QUESTIONNAIRE:   Textbook reading improvises your memory when compared to e books eBooks reading cause s shifting of focus when compared to textbooks (notifications, calls, messages) Increased screen time in reading e books may lead to adverse health effects (eye defects, headache etc.) E-reading helps in quick revision of the content Preparation with e-books consumes more time Content sharing is easy by e-books than text books Textbooks are more economical than e-books (one device many books) E-books have augmented reality experience when compared to textbooks (animated and graphic contents) Textbooks are easily available than e-books   What are your opinions/views about the choice of reading in future?           Results:   1st Bds students who recently appeared for their university examinations were provided a validated questionnaire and their responses were assessed and displayed in a bar graph: 75% students say that they absorb more information when they read Text Books when compared to E- books. 78% students infer that they get distracted while they use E-Books. 62% students strongly agree that screen time may be health hazardous (headache and eye strain) when compared to Text Book reading. 75% students agree that E-books help in quick revision than the Text Books. Interestingly here the availability of either E-Books or Text Books was equally voted which indicates the advancement of digitalization. 88% of the students prefer E-Books rather than Text Books as their content sharing is fast and easier. Discussion:                                                  This comparison of student preferences and use of e books had shown up many important findings. there were no age and gender factors involving in the study [3]. It was also interesting regarding the availability of the E and TEXT books which were equally voted that indicated a greater amount of digitalization going round the world.in regard of the comments given by the study participants previous use of e books doesn’t increase the preference for it.[1] the students were in search of the means through which they could achieve their best output.   By grouping all the elements given in the questionnaire it is able to find out that there was no actual difference between e books and text books. perhaps the reason for the low percentage is because of the different ways of getting adapted to either of the means according to their compatibility.   Apart from these, the advantages and disadvantages of either the segments were also included in this study.   Text books help to increase our memory, they get less distracted, and they’re easy on eyes, No need of current and batteries and it’s great for notes taking. But, on the other side of the coin they’re a bit non ecofriendly, can’t be carried everywhere and their maintenance is a tedious process.[4] E-books are like one device many books, they’re easily accessible, they act as a quick guide, they’re eco-friendly and maintained freely. On the other hand, they’re distracting, health hazardous, can’t be afforded by everyone and require electricity and batteries. Conclusion:    In this fast-growing world, the technology is drifting us towards its digitalization but, it doesn’t mean to leave our roots. Obviously, it depends from person’s interest; ultimately the one who makes up the best choice will get the best output. A person should always have a caution in his mind whether the technology codes our mind or we code the technology. We should also give some concern to divide the attention between a pixel and ink. Finally, when it comes to intensively reading long pieces of plain text, paper and ink may still have the advantage. But text is not the only way to read. So, in this study many of the participants were abruptly sent home because of the pandemic and lockdown. This led to the shortage of text books which made them to get adapted to e learning. Considering both their experiences 78% of the students voted for text books and 28% voted for e books.  References: Geethika B, Karpagam K. Comparing the choice of Ebooks Vs Textbooks among dental students-A Questionnaire based study. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016 Aug 1;9(8):1077. Zhang Y, Kudva S. E?books versus print books: Readers' choices and preferences across contexts. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2014 Aug;65(8):1695-706. Woody WD, Daniel DB, Baker CA. E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & education. 2010 Nov 1;55(3):945-8. Engbrecht JR. Digital textbooks versus print textbooks. Jabr F. The reading brain in the digital age: The science of paper versus screens. Scientific American. 2013 Apr 11;11(5).
2019冠状病毒病期间牙科学生对数字教科书与纸质教科书学习观念的评估问卷调查研究
目的:评估2019冠状病毒病期间Vishnu牙科学院学生的数字教科书与印刷教科书学习感知水平。问卷调查研究。目的:评价毗湿奴牙科学院学生对电子书和教科书学习的感知水平。关键词:电子书,教科书,感知水平,效果,牙科学生,学生。导言:自从教育进入这个世界,教科书就一直是一个向导。即使我们翻回古代,我们也会遇到刻在树叶、岩石、雕塑等上的铭文,从那里开始,书写的意识形态开始了,导致了印刷书籍的出现。自20世纪70年代中期数字化时代开始以来,教科书发生了演变,催生了电子书。电子学习已经转变为各种形式,如平板电脑、i -pad、kindle,并迅速成为一项快速发展的技术。考虑到成本、可及性、维护和环保等各种因素,传统阅读逐渐减少,导致许多书店倒闭,倒闭,筋疲力尽。但最终,不仅是设备或技术在进化,人也在进化。因此,在这次封锁中,许多学生开始接触电子阅读,为他们完成任务做准备。以此为契机,我们目前的研究是试图找出哪种学习方式比另一种学习方式效率更高,智力更高。材料和方法:对最近完成大学考试的一年级学生进行了问卷调查,不分性别和年龄。所有研究参与者均自愿填写由Vishnu牙科学院机构伦理委员会审核的问卷,问卷共10个问题,参考号为IEVDC/2021/UGD1/OP/Q/65。1年级以外的学生被排除在本研究之外。这个问卷是基于与课本和电子书相关的各个方面。进行重测信度,Cronbach’s alpha(?)值为0.83。对于每个回答,选项从非常同意到非常不同意不等。通过google表格收集数据并对知识、认知进行统计分析,计算并得出结果。数据管理采用简单的条形图和饼形图加百分比(%)。问卷调查:与阅读课本相比,阅读电子书会让你的记忆力即兴发挥。与阅读课本相比,阅读电子书会导致注意力转移(通知、电话、信息)。阅读电子书时屏幕时间的增加可能会对健康产生不利影响(眼睛缺陷、电子阅读有助于快速修改内容使用电子书准备花费更多时间电子书比课本更容易分享内容教科书比电子书更经济(一个设备多本书)电子书比课本(动画和图形内容)有增强现实体验教科书比电子书更容易获得你对未来阅读的选择有什么意见/看法?结果:我们为最近参加大学考试的一年级学生提供了一份有效的问卷,并对他们的回答进行了评估,并以柱状图的形式显示:75%的学生表示,与电子书相比,他们在阅读课本时吸收了更多的信息。78%的学生认为他们在使用电子书时会分心。62%的学生强烈认为,与阅读课本相比,屏幕时间可能对健康有害(头痛和眼睛疲劳)。75%的学生认为电子书比课本更有助于快速复习。有趣的是,电子书和教科书的可用性是平等的,这表明了数字化的进步。88%的学生更喜欢电子书,而不是教科书,因为它们的内容共享更快更容易。讨论 :                                                  这种比较学生的喜好和使用e书显示了许多重要的发现。本研究不涉及年龄和性别因素[3]。同样有趣的是,电子书和教科书的可用性也得到了同样的投票,这表明全球范围内的数字化程度正在提高。根据研究参与者给出的评论,以前使用电子书并没有增加对它的偏好。[1]学生们在寻找能够达到最佳产出的方法。通过对问卷中给出的所有元素进行分组,可以发现电子书和教科书之间没有实际的区别。也许低百分比的原因是因为根据它们的兼容性,适应这两种方法的方式不同。 除此之外,本研究还包括了这两个部分的优缺点。教科书有助于提高我们的记忆力,他们不会分心,他们对眼睛很好,不需要电流和电池,它很适合做笔记。但是,另一方面,它们有点不环保,不能随身携带,维护也是一个繁琐的过程。[4]电子书就像一个设备,很多书,它们很容易获取,它们可以作为快速指南,它们是环保的,并且可以免费维护。另一方面,它们会分散注意力,危害健康,不是每个人都能负担得起,而且需要电力和电池。结论:在这个快速发展的世界里,技术正把我们推向数字化,但这并不意味着离开我们的根。显然,这取决于个人的兴趣;最终,做出最佳选择的人将获得最佳输出。无论是技术编码我们的思想,还是我们编码技术,一个人都应该时刻保持警惕。我们还应该注意在像素和墨水之间划分注意力。最后,当涉及到精读长篇纯文本时,纸和墨水可能仍然有优势。但文本并不是唯一的阅读方式。因此,在这项研究中,由于大流行和封锁,许多参与者突然被送回家。这导致了课本的短缺,这使他们适应了电子学习。考虑到他们的经历,78%的学生投票给教科书,28%的学生投票给电子书。参考文献:Geethika B, Karpagam K.基于问卷的牙科学生电子书与教科书选择的比较研究。药学与技术研究。2016年8月1日;9(8):1077。张颖,Kudva s.e ?纸质书与纸质书:不同语境下读者的选择和偏好。信息科学与技术学报,2014,31(8):1695-706。伍迪·WD,丹尼尔·DB,贝克·CA。电子书还是教科书:学生更喜欢教科书。计算机与教育。2010年11月1日;55(3):945-8。电子教科书与印刷教科书。贾布尔·F.数字时代的阅读大脑:纸与屏幕的科学。科学美国人。2013年4月11日;11(5)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信