Near-field range assessment

C. Parini, S. Gregson, J. McCormick, D. Rensburg
{"title":"Near-field range assessment","authors":"C. Parini, S. Gregson, J. McCormick, D. Rensburg","doi":"10.1049/PBEW055E_ch8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The uncertainty concepts described in this chapter form the basis of any range assessment (RA), regardless of the type of test facility and therefore allow us to create a framework within which the quality of any antenna measurement result can be expressed. It also allows us to do meaningful range inter-comparisons that have become such an integral part of modern test programmes. Although most of the groundwork related to RAs was conducted in an effort to validate near-field testing in the early days, this work has found wider application and can today be applied to far-field and CATR test systems with equal success. It is safe to say that the antenna measurement community (for the most part) have adopted the principle that measurement results need to be reported with an associated uncertainty, to make them credible.Finally, a very welcome side effect of doing any RA is a greater understanding of the measurement process and associated weaknesses. This often leads to a clear definition of exactly what aspect needs to be addressed if uncertainty is to be reduced, making for a very efficient use of resources in the process.","PeriodicalId":212731,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Modern Antenna Range Measurements, 2nd Expanded Edition, Volume 2","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Modern Antenna Range Measurements, 2nd Expanded Edition, Volume 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/PBEW055E_ch8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The uncertainty concepts described in this chapter form the basis of any range assessment (RA), regardless of the type of test facility and therefore allow us to create a framework within which the quality of any antenna measurement result can be expressed. It also allows us to do meaningful range inter-comparisons that have become such an integral part of modern test programmes. Although most of the groundwork related to RAs was conducted in an effort to validate near-field testing in the early days, this work has found wider application and can today be applied to far-field and CATR test systems with equal success. It is safe to say that the antenna measurement community (for the most part) have adopted the principle that measurement results need to be reported with an associated uncertainty, to make them credible.Finally, a very welcome side effect of doing any RA is a greater understanding of the measurement process and associated weaknesses. This often leads to a clear definition of exactly what aspect needs to be addressed if uncertainty is to be reduced, making for a very efficient use of resources in the process.
近场距离评估
本章中描述的不确定性概念构成了任何距离评估(RA)的基础,无论测试设备的类型如何,因此允许我们创建一个框架,在该框架内可以表示任何天线测量结果的质量。它还使我们能够进行有意义的范围内比较,这已成为现代测试程序的一个组成部分。尽管与RAs相关的大部分基础工作在早期都是为了验证近场测试而进行的,但这项工作已经得到了更广泛的应用,如今可以应用于远场和CATR测试系统,并取得了同样的成功。可以肯定地说,天线测量界(在大多数情况下)已经采用了这样的原则,即测量结果需要与相关的不确定性一起报告,以使其可信。最后,进行任何RA的一个非常受欢迎的副作用是对度量过程和相关弱点的更好理解。这通常会导致一个明确的定义,即如果要减少不确定性,需要处理哪些方面,从而在过程中非常有效地利用资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信