Preparing for market disruption: circuit breakers and discretionary trading halts

Jennifer D. Morton, R. Sacks, Jenny Ding Jordan, S. Blau, P. S. Kelly, Taylor Pugliese, Andrew Lewis, Caitlin Hutchinson Maddox
{"title":"Preparing for market disruption: circuit breakers and discretionary trading halts","authors":"Jennifer D. Morton, R. Sacks, Jenny Ding Jordan, S. Blau, P. S. Kelly, Taylor Pugliese, Andrew Lewis, Caitlin Hutchinson Maddox","doi":"10.1108/joic-08-2020-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis article provides a resource for traders and other market participants by providing an overview of certain automatic circuit breaker mechanisms and discretionary powers that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the U.S. president, as applicable, can exercise to pause or stop the trading of individual securities or trading activities across exchanges during extreme market volatility, each of which can cause interruptions to trading activity.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis article surveys automatic and discretionary mechanisms to halt trading activity under extreme market conditions. In particular, the article examines automatic cross-market circuit breakers, limit up-limit down pauses, the alternative uptick rule, as well as discretionary authority to stop short selling of particular securities and to stop trading across exchanges.\n\n\nFindings\nThe article concludes that market participants must be cognizant not only of automatic cross-market circuit breakers, but also several other forms of potential market disruptions that may occur due to increased market volatility during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nBy exploring various mechanisms that respond to market disruption, this article provides a valuable resource for traders and other market participants looking to identify and respond to potential interruptions to their trading activity.\n","PeriodicalId":399186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investment Compliance","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investment Compliance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/joic-08-2020-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This article provides a resource for traders and other market participants by providing an overview of certain automatic circuit breaker mechanisms and discretionary powers that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the U.S. president, as applicable, can exercise to pause or stop the trading of individual securities or trading activities across exchanges during extreme market volatility, each of which can cause interruptions to trading activity. Design/methodology/approach This article surveys automatic and discretionary mechanisms to halt trading activity under extreme market conditions. In particular, the article examines automatic cross-market circuit breakers, limit up-limit down pauses, the alternative uptick rule, as well as discretionary authority to stop short selling of particular securities and to stop trading across exchanges. Findings The article concludes that market participants must be cognizant not only of automatic cross-market circuit breakers, but also several other forms of potential market disruptions that may occur due to increased market volatility during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Originality/value By exploring various mechanisms that respond to market disruption, this article provides a valuable resource for traders and other market participants looking to identify and respond to potential interruptions to their trading activity.
为市场中断做准备:熔断机制和酌情暂停交易
本文通过概述美国证券交易委员会(SEC)、金融业监管局(FINRA)和美国总统(如适用)在极端市场波动期间可以行使暂停或停止个别证券交易或跨交易所交易活动的某些自动熔断机制和自由裁量权,为交易者和其他市场参与者提供资源。每一种都可能导致交易活动中断。本文调查了在极端市场条件下停止交易活动的自动和自由裁量机制。特别是,本文研究了自动跨市场熔断机制、限制涨跌暂停、替代上涨规则,以及停止卖空特定证券和停止跨交易所交易的自由裁量权。文章的结论是,市场参与者不仅要认识到自动跨市场熔断机制,还要认识到在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间及之后,由于市场波动加剧,可能出现的其他几种形式的潜在市场中断。原创性/价值通过探索应对市场中断的各种机制,本文为交易者和其他市场参与者提供了宝贵的资源,帮助他们识别和应对交易活动的潜在中断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信