Evaluation the Presence of Border Molding in Final Impression for Fabrication of Removable Prosthesis by General Practitioner in Tripoli, Libya

Sarra Ben Hamida
{"title":"Evaluation the Presence of Border Molding in Final Impression for Fabrication of Removable Prosthesis by General Practitioner in Tripoli, Libya","authors":"Sarra Ben Hamida","doi":"10.47705/kjdmr.237105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objectives. Cross infection among prosthodontologist and dental lab technicians is very important issue, especially after several studies found that transmission of infection to dental lab technicians is mainly by contaminated impressions or by improper handling of clinical items after arrival at the Dental laboratory. Dental impressions can be cross-contaminated by patient’s saliva and blood, which then cross-infect the dental casts poured from the impressions. The present study was carried out to evaluate the knowledge and the practice of infection control of dental impressions among dental technicians in Tripoli, Libya. Methods. This study was based on questionnaire that designed to cover different aspects of cross-infection control in the dental clinic. The questionnaire consists of 10 closed end question and 3 yes, no question. Results. The response rate was 85%. The questionnaire showed that almost 32.9% of the dental technicians did not have instructions related to disinfection in the dental lab. Upon receipt of dental impressions, the majority (80.5%) reported always rinsing them with water only. Moreover, about 7.8% of the dental technicians reported never disinfecting dental impressions and about 16.9% reported that they sometimes disinfected impressions. In the labs were the disinfection applied, 12% of the dental labs used spray disinfection (without water) and also 12% of dental technicians used immersion disinfection (without water). Conclusion. The findings of this study show that practices and awareness of dental technicians regarding infection control are less than ideal, moreover there is lack of communication between dentists and dental technicians so should increase awareness and establishing educational programs for both dentists and dental technicians to decrease the risk of transmission of diseases in dental laboratories.","PeriodicalId":436335,"journal":{"name":"Khalij-Libya Journal of Dental and Medical Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khalij-Libya Journal of Dental and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47705/kjdmr.237105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives. Cross infection among prosthodontologist and dental lab technicians is very important issue, especially after several studies found that transmission of infection to dental lab technicians is mainly by contaminated impressions or by improper handling of clinical items after arrival at the Dental laboratory. Dental impressions can be cross-contaminated by patient’s saliva and blood, which then cross-infect the dental casts poured from the impressions. The present study was carried out to evaluate the knowledge and the practice of infection control of dental impressions among dental technicians in Tripoli, Libya. Methods. This study was based on questionnaire that designed to cover different aspects of cross-infection control in the dental clinic. The questionnaire consists of 10 closed end question and 3 yes, no question. Results. The response rate was 85%. The questionnaire showed that almost 32.9% of the dental technicians did not have instructions related to disinfection in the dental lab. Upon receipt of dental impressions, the majority (80.5%) reported always rinsing them with water only. Moreover, about 7.8% of the dental technicians reported never disinfecting dental impressions and about 16.9% reported that they sometimes disinfected impressions. In the labs were the disinfection applied, 12% of the dental labs used spray disinfection (without water) and also 12% of dental technicians used immersion disinfection (without water). Conclusion. The findings of this study show that practices and awareness of dental technicians regarding infection control are less than ideal, moreover there is lack of communication between dentists and dental technicians so should increase awareness and establishing educational programs for both dentists and dental technicians to decrease the risk of transmission of diseases in dental laboratories.
利比亚的黎波里全科医生对可移动假体最终印模中边界成型的存在进行评估
背景和目标。口腔修复医师和牙科实验室技术人员之间的交叉感染是一个非常重要的问题,特别是经过几项研究发现,感染传播给牙科实验室技术人员主要是由于污染的印模或到达牙科实验室后对临床物品的不当处理。牙印可能被患者的唾液和血液交叉污染,然后交叉感染从牙印中倒出的牙模。目前的研究是进行评估的知识和做法,牙印感染控制在的黎波里的牙科技术人员,利比亚。方法。本研究以问卷调查为基础,涵盖牙科诊所交叉感染控制的不同层面。问卷由10个封闭式问题和3个是非问题组成。结果。应答率为85%。问卷调查显示,近32.9%的牙科技师在口腔实验室中没有相关的消毒说明。收到牙印后,大多数(80.5%)报告总是用水冲洗。此外,约7.8%的牙科技术人员报告从未消毒牙印,约16.9%的人报告他们有时消毒牙印。采用消毒的实验室中,12%的牙科实验室采用喷雾消毒(无水),12%的牙科技师采用浸泡消毒(无水)。结论。本研究结果显示,牙科技术人员对感染控制的实践和意识不够理想,而且牙医和牙科技术人员之间缺乏沟通,因此应提高牙医和牙科技术人员的意识并建立教育计划,以降低疾病在牙科实验室的传播风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信