Spectral Observations and Modeling of a Solar White-light Flare Observed by CHASE

Dechao Song, J. Tian, Y. Li, M. Ding, Yang Su, Sijie Yu, Jie Hong, Ye Qiu, S. Rao, Xiaofeng Liu, Qiao-Chu Li, Xingyao Chen, Chuan Li, Cheng Fang
{"title":"Spectral Observations and Modeling of a Solar White-light Flare Observed by CHASE","authors":"Dechao Song, J. Tian, Y. Li, M. Ding, Yang Su, Sijie Yu, Jie Hong, Ye Qiu, S. Rao, Xiaofeng Liu, Qiao-Chu Li, Xingyao Chen, Chuan Li, Cheng Fang","doi":"10.3847/2041-8213/ace18c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The heating mechanisms of solar white-light flares remain unclear. We present an X1.0 white-light flare on 2022 October 2 (SOL2022-10-02T20:25) observed by the Chinese Hα Solar Explorer that provides two-dimensional spectra in the visible light for the full solar disk with a seeing-free condition. The flare shows a prominent enhancement of ∼40% in the photospheric Fe i line at 6569.2 Å, and the nearby continuum also exhibits a maximum enhancement of ∼40%. For the continuum near the Fe i line at 6173 Å from the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory, it is enhanced up to ∼20%. At the white-light kernels, the Fe i line at 6569.2 Å has a symmetric Gaussian profile that is still in absorption and the Hα line at 6562.8 Å displays a very broad emission profile with a central reversal plus a red or blue asymmetry. The white-light kernels are cospatial with the microwave footpoint sources observed by the Expanded Owens Valley Solar Array and the time profile of the white-light emission matches that of the hard X-ray emission above 30 keV from the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on Fermi. These facts indicate that the white-light emission is qualitatively related to a nonthermal electron beam. We also perform a radiative hydrodynamic simulation with the electron-beam parameters constrained by the hard X-ray observations from Fermi/GBM. The result reveals that the white-light enhancement cannot be well explained by a pure electron-beam heating together with its induced radiative backwarming but may need additional heating sources such as Alfvén waves.","PeriodicalId":179976,"journal":{"name":"The Astrophysical Journal Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Astrophysical Journal Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ace18c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The heating mechanisms of solar white-light flares remain unclear. We present an X1.0 white-light flare on 2022 October 2 (SOL2022-10-02T20:25) observed by the Chinese Hα Solar Explorer that provides two-dimensional spectra in the visible light for the full solar disk with a seeing-free condition. The flare shows a prominent enhancement of ∼40% in the photospheric Fe i line at 6569.2 Å, and the nearby continuum also exhibits a maximum enhancement of ∼40%. For the continuum near the Fe i line at 6173 Å from the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory, it is enhanced up to ∼20%. At the white-light kernels, the Fe i line at 6569.2 Å has a symmetric Gaussian profile that is still in absorption and the Hα line at 6562.8 Å displays a very broad emission profile with a central reversal plus a red or blue asymmetry. The white-light kernels are cospatial with the microwave footpoint sources observed by the Expanded Owens Valley Solar Array and the time profile of the white-light emission matches that of the hard X-ray emission above 30 keV from the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on Fermi. These facts indicate that the white-light emission is qualitatively related to a nonthermal electron beam. We also perform a radiative hydrodynamic simulation with the electron-beam parameters constrained by the hard X-ray observations from Fermi/GBM. The result reveals that the white-light enhancement cannot be well explained by a pure electron-beam heating together with its induced radiative backwarming but may need additional heating sources such as Alfvén waves.
一次太阳白光耀斑的光谱观测与模拟
太阳白光耀斑的加热机制尚不清楚。本文报道了中国Hα太阳探测器于2022年10月2日观测到的一个X1.0白光耀斑(SOL2022-10-02T20:25),该耀斑提供了全太阳盘在无可见光条件下的二维光谱。在6569.2 Å处,耀斑在光球Fe - i线上显示出明显的~ 40%的增强,而附近的连续体也显示出最大的~ 40%的增强。对于6173 Å处Fe - i线附近的连续体,太阳动力学观测站上的日震和磁成像仪将其增强到约20%。在白光内核处,位于6569.2 Å处的Fe - i线具有对称的高斯分布,仍然处于吸收状态,而位于6562.8 Å处的h - α线显示出非常宽的发射分布,中心反转加上红色或蓝色不对称。白光核与扩展欧文斯谷太阳能阵列观测到的微波足点源是共空间的,白光发射的时间分布与费米伽玛射线暴监测仪(GBM) 30 keV以上的硬x射线发射的时间分布相匹配。这些事实表明,白光发射定性地与非热电电子束有关。我们还用Fermi/GBM硬x射线观测约束下的电子束参数进行了辐射流体动力学模拟。结果表明,单纯的电子束加热及其引起的辐射回温不能很好地解释白光增强,而可能需要附加的加热源,如alfvsamn波。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信