Do Individuals Have Preferences Used in Macro-Finance Models? An Experimental Investigation

Alexander L. Brown, Hwagyun Kim
{"title":"Do Individuals Have Preferences Used in Macro-Finance Models? An Experimental Investigation","authors":"Alexander L. Brown, Hwagyun Kim","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2013.1794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent financial studies often assume that agents have Epstein--Zin preferences---preferences that require agents to care about when uncertainty is resolved. Under this “recursive-preference” framework, the preference for uncertainty resolution is entirely determined by an agent's preferences for risk and intertemporal substitution. To test the implications of this model, this paper presents an experiment designed to elicit subject preferences on risk, time, intertemporal substitution, and uncertainty resolution. Results reveal that most subjects prefer early resolution of uncertainty and have relative risk aversion greater than the reciprocal of the elasticity of intertemporal substitution, consistent with the predictions by recursive preferences. Subjects are classified in a finite mixture model by their risk, time, and intertemporal-substitution parameters. Regression results show that types predicted by the Epstein--Zin model to prefer early resolution choose early resolution with 20%--50% higher probability.Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1794 This paper was accepted by Brad Barber, finance.","PeriodicalId":125760,"journal":{"name":"Texas A&M University Mays Business School Research Paper Series","volume":"7 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texas A&M University Mays Business School Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

Recent financial studies often assume that agents have Epstein--Zin preferences---preferences that require agents to care about when uncertainty is resolved. Under this “recursive-preference” framework, the preference for uncertainty resolution is entirely determined by an agent's preferences for risk and intertemporal substitution. To test the implications of this model, this paper presents an experiment designed to elicit subject preferences on risk, time, intertemporal substitution, and uncertainty resolution. Results reveal that most subjects prefer early resolution of uncertainty and have relative risk aversion greater than the reciprocal of the elasticity of intertemporal substitution, consistent with the predictions by recursive preferences. Subjects are classified in a finite mixture model by their risk, time, and intertemporal-substitution parameters. Regression results show that types predicted by the Epstein--Zin model to prefer early resolution choose early resolution with 20%--50% higher probability.Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1794 This paper was accepted by Brad Barber, finance.
宏观金融模型中个人是否有偏好?实验研究
最近的金融研究通常假设,代理人具有爱泼斯坦偏好(Epstein- Zin preferences),这种偏好要求代理人关心不确定性何时得到解决。在这种“递归偏好”框架下,对不确定性解决的偏好完全取决于代理人对风险和跨期替代的偏好。为了检验这一模型的含义,本文提出了一个实验,旨在引出受试者对风险、时间、跨期替代和不确定性解决的偏好。结果表明,大多数被试倾向于不确定性的早期解决,相对风险厌恶大于跨期替代弹性的倒数,这与递归偏好的预测一致。受试者按其风险、时间和时间间替代参数在有限混合模型中分类。回归结果表明,Epstein—Zin模型预测的偏好早期分辨率的类型选择早期分辨率的概率高出20% ~ 50%。数据,作为补充材料,可在http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1794。本文被Brad Barber, finance接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信