Hybrid Planning Tool for Solar and Battery Systems in Ontario

Christopher Rockx, J. Tate, E. Rogers
{"title":"Hybrid Planning Tool for Solar and Battery Systems in Ontario","authors":"Christopher Rockx, J. Tate, E. Rogers","doi":"10.1109/SEGE.2018.8499437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is increasing momentum for behind-the-meter renewable generation and storage installations due to an increased focus on limiting the environmental impact of electricity generation. Local energy policy influences the sizing and financial viability of these systems while also serving to promote the smart uptake of these technologies on the electricity grid. This paper proposes a methodology for optimal infrastructure sizing of small-scale solar photovoltaic generation and battery energy storage technologies required to become grid neutral under a net metering energy contract. A robust linear programming model is proposed, and probabilistic robustness guarantees are provided by manipulating the magnitude and frequency of uncertainty realizations using a budget of uncertainty approach. A practical test case is performed in Toronto, Ontario, and the results reveal that a 99% robustness guarantee requires additional infrastructure capital costs of $6,700 (26%) over the purely deterministic scenario investment of $25,700. Furthermore, it is shown that the net metering policy does not provide sufficient financial inventive to Ontario homeowners, and project costs exceed benefits by between $4,400 and $9,200 depending on robustness. Finally, Ontario net metering policy in its current form does not incentivize energy storage, and instead relies on the electricity grid as a free and lossless storage device—a practice which is likely unsustainable. Future work is available to enhance the existing methodology or leverage the proposed methodology for application to new fields of research.","PeriodicalId":123677,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Smart Energy Grid Engineering (SEGE)","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Smart Energy Grid Engineering (SEGE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEGE.2018.8499437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is increasing momentum for behind-the-meter renewable generation and storage installations due to an increased focus on limiting the environmental impact of electricity generation. Local energy policy influences the sizing and financial viability of these systems while also serving to promote the smart uptake of these technologies on the electricity grid. This paper proposes a methodology for optimal infrastructure sizing of small-scale solar photovoltaic generation and battery energy storage technologies required to become grid neutral under a net metering energy contract. A robust linear programming model is proposed, and probabilistic robustness guarantees are provided by manipulating the magnitude and frequency of uncertainty realizations using a budget of uncertainty approach. A practical test case is performed in Toronto, Ontario, and the results reveal that a 99% robustness guarantee requires additional infrastructure capital costs of $6,700 (26%) over the purely deterministic scenario investment of $25,700. Furthermore, it is shown that the net metering policy does not provide sufficient financial inventive to Ontario homeowners, and project costs exceed benefits by between $4,400 and $9,200 depending on robustness. Finally, Ontario net metering policy in its current form does not incentivize energy storage, and instead relies on the electricity grid as a free and lossless storage device—a practice which is likely unsustainable. Future work is available to enhance the existing methodology or leverage the proposed methodology for application to new fields of research.
安大略省太阳能和电池系统的混合规划工具
由于越来越重视限制发电对环境的影响,可再生能源发电和存储装置的发展势头越来越大。地方能源政策影响着这些系统的规模和财务可行性,同时也有助于促进这些技术在电网上的智能采用。本文提出了一种在净计量能源合同下成为电网中性所需的小型太阳能光伏发电和电池储能技术的最佳基础设施规模的方法。提出了一种鲁棒线性规划模型,并利用不确定性预算方法通过控制不确定性实现的大小和频率来提供概率鲁棒性保证。在安大略省多伦多进行了实际测试用例,结果表明,99%的稳健性保证需要额外的基础设施资本成本6700美元(26%),而纯确定性情景投资为25700美元。此外,研究表明,净计量政策并没有为安大略省的房主提供足够的财务创新,根据稳健性,项目成本超过收益在4,400美元到9,200美元之间。最后,安大略省现行的净计量政策并没有激励能源储存,而是依赖电网作为一个免费的、无损的储存设备——这种做法可能是不可持续的。未来的工作是加强现有的方法或利用拟议的方法应用于新的研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信