{"title":"Love-Hate and War: Perfectionism and Self-Overcoming in Thus Spoke Zarathustra","authors":"H. Siemens","doi":"10.1515/nietzstu-2021-0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This essay investigates the thought of self-overcoming (Selbst-Überwindung, sich überwinden) in Thus Spoke Zarathustra, and its relation to Nietzsche’s Emersonian perfectionism in Schopenhauer as Educator. It is a conceptual study focused on key passages on self-overcoming in Zarathustra and related problems – most notably how to combine the demand for boundless affirmation with the demand for total critique in Nietzsche’s project of critical transvaluation. The main thesis is that Zarathustra’s response depends on his addressees: with regard to the mob, the rabble or Gesindel, he advocates a limit in negation under the sign of mildness (Milde); with regard to others engaged in self-overcoming, he advocates a limited negation in the form of love-hate. Connections with the perfectionism of Schopenhauer as Educator are made throughout the essay, which then draws them together in a comparative analysis of self-overcoming in Zarathustra and Nietzsche’s untimely perfectionism. The essay closes with some methodological reflections on the risks and benefits of its “prismatic” approach, focused on key passages in relation to other works in abstraction from the overall composition and narrative of the book.","PeriodicalId":356515,"journal":{"name":"Nietzsche-Studien","volume":"416 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nietzsche-Studien","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/nietzstu-2021-0058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract This essay investigates the thought of self-overcoming (Selbst-Überwindung, sich überwinden) in Thus Spoke Zarathustra, and its relation to Nietzsche’s Emersonian perfectionism in Schopenhauer as Educator. It is a conceptual study focused on key passages on self-overcoming in Zarathustra and related problems – most notably how to combine the demand for boundless affirmation with the demand for total critique in Nietzsche’s project of critical transvaluation. The main thesis is that Zarathustra’s response depends on his addressees: with regard to the mob, the rabble or Gesindel, he advocates a limit in negation under the sign of mildness (Milde); with regard to others engaged in self-overcoming, he advocates a limited negation in the form of love-hate. Connections with the perfectionism of Schopenhauer as Educator are made throughout the essay, which then draws them together in a comparative analysis of self-overcoming in Zarathustra and Nietzsche’s untimely perfectionism. The essay closes with some methodological reflections on the risks and benefits of its “prismatic” approach, focused on key passages in relation to other works in abstraction from the overall composition and narrative of the book.
摘要本文考察了《查拉图斯特拉如是说》中的自我克服思想(Selbst-Überwindung, sich berwinden)及其与《叔本华作为教育家》中尼采的爱默生式完美主义的关系。这是一个概念性的研究,集中在查拉图斯特拉自我克服的关键段落和相关问题上,最值得注意的是如何结合对无限肯定的需求和对尼采批判性重估项目中全面批判的需求。主要论点是,查拉图斯特拉的回应取决于他的听众:关于暴民、乌合之众或格辛德尔,他主张在温和(Milde)的标志下限制否定;对于那些从事自我克服的人,他主张以爱恨的形式进行有限的否定。与作为教育家的叔本华的完美主义的联系贯穿了整篇文章,然后将他们聚集在一起,对查拉图斯特拉的自我克服和尼采的不合时宜的完美主义进行比较分析。这篇文章以一些关于其“棱镜”方法的风险和好处的方法论反思结束,重点是与其他作品抽象的关键段落,从书的整体构成和叙述中。