The Leadership Imperative: A Collaborative Approach to Professional Development in the Global Age of More for Less

Scott Westfahl, D. Wilkins
{"title":"The Leadership Imperative: A Collaborative Approach to Professional Development in the Global Age of More for Less","authors":"Scott Westfahl, D. Wilkins","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3013150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Notwithstanding the increasing importance of technology, the practice of corporate law is — and is likely to remain for the foreseeable future — a human capital business. As a result, law firms must continue to attract, develop, and retain talented lawyers. Unfortunately, the traditional approach, which divides responsibility for professional development among law schools, which are supposed to teach students to think like a lawyer; law firms, which are expected to train associates to “be” lawyers; and corporate clients, whose job it is to foot the bill, is no longer well aligned to the current realities of the marketplace. In this Article, we document the causes for this misalignment and propose a new model of professional development in which law schools, law firms, and corporate clients collaborate to train lawyers to be lifelong learners in the full range of technical, professional, and network-building skills they will need to flourish throughout their careers. We offer specific proposals for how to achieve this realignment and confront the resistance that will inevitably greet any attempt to do so.","PeriodicalId":330356,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: The Legal Profession eJournal","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: The Legal Profession eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3013150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Notwithstanding the increasing importance of technology, the practice of corporate law is — and is likely to remain for the foreseeable future — a human capital business. As a result, law firms must continue to attract, develop, and retain talented lawyers. Unfortunately, the traditional approach, which divides responsibility for professional development among law schools, which are supposed to teach students to think like a lawyer; law firms, which are expected to train associates to “be” lawyers; and corporate clients, whose job it is to foot the bill, is no longer well aligned to the current realities of the marketplace. In this Article, we document the causes for this misalignment and propose a new model of professional development in which law schools, law firms, and corporate clients collaborate to train lawyers to be lifelong learners in the full range of technical, professional, and network-building skills they will need to flourish throughout their careers. We offer specific proposals for how to achieve this realignment and confront the resistance that will inevitably greet any attempt to do so.
领导力的必要性:在全球多花钱少花钱时代的专业发展合作方法
尽管技术的重要性日益增加,但公司法的实践仍然是——而且在可预见的未来可能仍然是——一项人力资本业务。因此,律师事务所必须继续吸引、培养和留住有才能的律师。不幸的是,传统的方法,将专业发展的责任分配给法学院,法学院应该教学生像律师一样思考;律师事务所,希望将员工培养成“律师”;而企业客户,他们的工作是买单,不再与当前的市场现实保持一致。在这篇文章中,我们记录了这种错位的原因,并提出了一种新的专业发展模式,在这种模式下,法学院、律师事务所和企业客户合作,将律师培养成终身学习者,掌握他们在整个职业生涯中蓬勃发展所需的技术、专业和网络建设技能。我们提出具体建议,说明如何实现这一调整,并面对任何这样做的企图将不可避免地遇到的阻力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信