Psychological Treatments for Psychosis: Evidence Based but Unavailable?

E. Kuipers
{"title":"Psychological Treatments for Psychosis: Evidence Based but Unavailable?","authors":"E. Kuipers","doi":"10.1080/10973430008408409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Psychosis used not to be seen as a central area for psychological intervention. In the last decade this perception has been changed, with the accumulation of evidence on the efficacy of family intervention for those living with psychosis (staff carers may also benefit from this), and from trials of individual cognitive behavioral intervention with psychosis, trials that have been largely conducted in Britain. This evidence is now compelling for the family work and promising for the individual interventions that services need to be able to offer them. However, the gap between showing efficacy and the routine implementation of effective services appears particularly hard to bridge for psychological interventions. These are cost effective, but require training, supervision, staff support, and management input in order to become generally available; this appears to be a crucial next stage in psychiatric rehabilitation.","PeriodicalId":166369,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Skills","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Skills","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10973430008408409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Abstract Psychosis used not to be seen as a central area for psychological intervention. In the last decade this perception has been changed, with the accumulation of evidence on the efficacy of family intervention for those living with psychosis (staff carers may also benefit from this), and from trials of individual cognitive behavioral intervention with psychosis, trials that have been largely conducted in Britain. This evidence is now compelling for the family work and promising for the individual interventions that services need to be able to offer them. However, the gap between showing efficacy and the routine implementation of effective services appears particularly hard to bridge for psychological interventions. These are cost effective, but require training, supervision, staff support, and management input in order to become generally available; this appears to be a crucial next stage in psychiatric rehabilitation.
精神病的心理治疗:基于证据但不可用?
精神病过去不被视为心理干预的中心领域。在过去的十年中,随着家庭干预对精神病患者有效性的证据的积累(工作人员护理人员也可能从中受益),以及对精神病患者进行个人认知行为干预的试验(这些试验主要在英国进行),这种看法已经改变。这一证据现在对家庭工作具有说服力,对服务机构需要能够提供的个人干预措施也很有希望。然而,在心理干预方面,显示效力与常规实施有效服务之间的差距似乎特别难以弥合。这些方法具有成本效益,但需要培训、监督、工作人员支助和管理投入,才能普遍使用;这似乎是精神康复的下一个关键阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信