Manufacturing Lumbini

Blayne K. Harcey
{"title":"Manufacturing Lumbini","authors":"Blayne K. Harcey","doi":"10.26443/jcreor.v4i1.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article draws attention to the United Nations' sustained development interventions at the Buddha’s birthplace of Lumbini, in the rural Terai region of Nepal. Following a self-described “pilgrimage” to Lumbini in April 1967, former United Nations secretary-general U Thant championed a call to restore the site to its rightful glory as a global pilgrimage destination and center of “world peace.” Despite fifty years of formal sponsorship by the United Nations, Lumbini’s development remains incomplete. This article has three main arguments. First, the UN’s sustained investment in Lumbini marks an unprecedented convergence between the international peacekeeping organization and expressions of religious piety and devotion. For many Buddhists, Lumbini is regarded as an auspicious place on par with Jerusalem or Mecca. Decades of interventions at Lumbini challenge normative assumptions concerning the UN’s secular authority. Second, through these sustained investments the UN became the preeminent patron of Lumbini, conferring to the international organization the power to mobilize Buddhist ethical principles in its peacekeeping agendas during the Cold War. Development interventions at Lumbini led to the appropriation of a pacified and politically benign Buddhist ethic premised solely on the Buddha’s teachings of compassion (karuṇā), good-will (metta), and nonviolence (ahiṃsā). These ethical maxims were harmonized with the UN Charter and redirected to justify the organization’s sustained investment in Nepal. Third, UN sponsorship of Lumbini brought together disparate political entities and religious organizations in service of a common goal, but friction amongst these stakeholders beleaguered the development proceedings throughout the latter half of the twentieth century. Despite these tensions, UN intervention has left an indelible mark on the accessibility of the site and its global prestige as a UNESCO World Heritage Site.","PeriodicalId":178128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Council for Research on Religion","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Council for Research on Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26443/jcreor.v4i1.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article draws attention to the United Nations' sustained development interventions at the Buddha’s birthplace of Lumbini, in the rural Terai region of Nepal. Following a self-described “pilgrimage” to Lumbini in April 1967, former United Nations secretary-general U Thant championed a call to restore the site to its rightful glory as a global pilgrimage destination and center of “world peace.” Despite fifty years of formal sponsorship by the United Nations, Lumbini’s development remains incomplete. This article has three main arguments. First, the UN’s sustained investment in Lumbini marks an unprecedented convergence between the international peacekeeping organization and expressions of religious piety and devotion. For many Buddhists, Lumbini is regarded as an auspicious place on par with Jerusalem or Mecca. Decades of interventions at Lumbini challenge normative assumptions concerning the UN’s secular authority. Second, through these sustained investments the UN became the preeminent patron of Lumbini, conferring to the international organization the power to mobilize Buddhist ethical principles in its peacekeeping agendas during the Cold War. Development interventions at Lumbini led to the appropriation of a pacified and politically benign Buddhist ethic premised solely on the Buddha’s teachings of compassion (karuṇā), good-will (metta), and nonviolence (ahiṃsā). These ethical maxims were harmonized with the UN Charter and redirected to justify the organization’s sustained investment in Nepal. Third, UN sponsorship of Lumbini brought together disparate political entities and religious organizations in service of a common goal, but friction amongst these stakeholders beleaguered the development proceedings throughout the latter half of the twentieth century. Despite these tensions, UN intervention has left an indelible mark on the accessibility of the site and its global prestige as a UNESCO World Heritage Site.
制造蓝毗尼
这篇文章引起了人们对联合国在佛陀诞生地蓝毗尼的持续发展干预的关注,蓝毗尼位于尼泊尔的特莱农村地区。1967年4月,前联合国秘书长吴丹(U Thant)自称前往蓝毗尼“朝圣”,之后呼吁恢复该遗址应有的荣耀,成为全球朝圣目的地和“世界和平”中心。尽管联合国正式赞助了五十年,蓝毗尼的发展仍然不完整。本文有三个主要论点。首先,联合国在蓝毗尼的持续投资标志着国际维和组织与宗教虔诚和奉献的表达之间前所未有的融合。对于许多佛教徒来说,蓝毗尼被视为与耶路撒冷或麦加一样吉祥的地方。几十年来对蓝毗尼的干预挑战了有关联合国世俗权威的规范假设。其次,通过这些持续的投资,联合国成为蓝毗尼的杰出赞助人,赋予这个国际组织在冷战期间在其维和议程中调动佛教伦理原则的权力。蓝毗尼的发展干预导致了一种和平的、政治上温和的佛教伦理的滥用,其前提仅仅是佛陀的慈悲(karuṇā)、善意(metta)和非暴力(ahiṃsā)的教义。这些道德准则与联合国宪章相协调,并重新定位为该组织在尼泊尔持续投资的理由。第三,联合国对蓝毗尼的赞助将不同的政治实体和宗教组织聚集在一起,为共同的目标服务,但这些利益相关者之间的摩擦困扰着整个20世纪后半叶的发展进程。尽管存在这些紧张局势,但联合国的干预为该遗址的可达性及其作为联合国教科文组织世界遗产的全球声誉留下了不可磨灭的印记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信