Model simulations and comparative evaluations of susceptibility-based and gadolinium contrast enhancement for high-resolution brain venography

E. Casciaro, R. Franchini, F. Conversano, P. Pisani, S. Casciaro, A. Lay-Ekuakille
{"title":"Model simulations and comparative evaluations of susceptibility-based and gadolinium contrast enhancement for high-resolution brain venography","authors":"E. Casciaro, R. Franchini, F. Conversano, P. Pisani, S. Casciaro, A. Lay-Ekuakille","doi":"10.1109/MeMeA.2016.7533729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The MRI signal, in terms of amplitude and phase, was simulated for susceptibility-based brain venography (BV) without and with administration of contrast agent (CA) under standard clinical parameters and field magnitude of 1.5 T (Tesla). Then, in order to compare the enhancement due to CA and that one obtained through susceptibility weighted magnitude image (SWI) processing, exploiting only the intrinsic magnetic susceptibility differences between blood and surrounding tissue, the simulated signal was processed with a well-known phase masking technique to increase signal differences as a function of tissue type, thus generating better image contrast. The simulation was carried out adopting a well-established bi-compartmental model, described by a set of analytical formulas. The based simulated signal was processed with the SWI technique considering a conventional masking procedure available in literature and a different masking method designed and described in our previous work. The resulting enhanced signals in terms of image contrast obtained with these two different phase masking procedures and with the administration of conventional CA were compared. The new designed mask (DM), compared with the conventional one, allows to get better results in terms of image contrast for all blood volume fractions considered in the simulation. Additionally, better results can be obtained also with respect to the case of CA administration only. Results from model simulations demonstrate the effectiveness of masking techniques to improve image contrast regarding all vessel sizes of clinical interest in the high resolution susceptibility-based brain venography possibly avoiding, in some cases, the need for CA administration.","PeriodicalId":221120,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA.2016.7533729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The MRI signal, in terms of amplitude and phase, was simulated for susceptibility-based brain venography (BV) without and with administration of contrast agent (CA) under standard clinical parameters and field magnitude of 1.5 T (Tesla). Then, in order to compare the enhancement due to CA and that one obtained through susceptibility weighted magnitude image (SWI) processing, exploiting only the intrinsic magnetic susceptibility differences between blood and surrounding tissue, the simulated signal was processed with a well-known phase masking technique to increase signal differences as a function of tissue type, thus generating better image contrast. The simulation was carried out adopting a well-established bi-compartmental model, described by a set of analytical formulas. The based simulated signal was processed with the SWI technique considering a conventional masking procedure available in literature and a different masking method designed and described in our previous work. The resulting enhanced signals in terms of image contrast obtained with these two different phase masking procedures and with the administration of conventional CA were compared. The new designed mask (DM), compared with the conventional one, allows to get better results in terms of image contrast for all blood volume fractions considered in the simulation. Additionally, better results can be obtained also with respect to the case of CA administration only. Results from model simulations demonstrate the effectiveness of masking techniques to improve image contrast regarding all vessel sizes of clinical interest in the high resolution susceptibility-based brain venography possibly avoiding, in some cases, the need for CA administration.
高分辨率脑静脉造影中基于敏感性和钆造影剂增强的模型模拟和比较评估
在标准临床参数和1.5 T(特斯拉)场强下,模拟无对比剂(CA)和有对比剂(CA)的基于敏感性的脑静脉造影(BV)的MRI信号的振幅和相位。然后,为了比较CA和敏感性加权幅度图像(SWI)处理得到的增强,只利用血液和周围组织之间的固有磁化率差异,用众所周知的相位掩蔽技术对模拟信号进行处理,增加信号差异作为组织类型的函数,从而产生更好的图像对比度。模拟采用了一个完善的双区室模型,由一组解析公式描述。基于模拟信号的SWI技术考虑了文献中可用的传统掩蔽程序和我们之前工作中设计和描述的不同掩蔽方法。通过比较这两种不同的相位掩蔽程序和常规CA管理获得的图像对比度方面的增强信号。与传统掩膜相比,新设计的掩膜(DM)可以在模拟中考虑的所有血容量分数的图像对比度方面获得更好的结果。此外,仅在CA管理的情况下也可以获得更好的结果。模型模拟的结果表明,在高分辨率基于敏感性的脑静脉造影中,掩蔽技术可以有效地提高临床感兴趣的所有血管大小的图像对比度,在某些情况下可能避免需要CA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信