Assessment of Responsibilities of Universities through Quality Assurance Information Published

Bui Vu Anh, N. T. Hang
{"title":"Assessment of Responsibilities of Universities through Quality Assurance Information Published","authors":"Bui Vu Anh, N. T. Hang","doi":"10.25073/2588-1159/vnuer.4731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Improving accountability in university autonomy is a trend of countries with advanced university governance in the world. The higher the degree of autonomy, the higher the transparency and accountability of activities in educational institutions is required. This brings sustainability to the autonomy mechanism, giving stakeholders confidence in the educational institution itself. On December 28, 2017, the Ministry of Education and Training issued Circular 36/2017/TT-BGDDT promulgating the Regulation on public implementation for education and training institutions under the national education system. This Circular requires educational institutions to publicize information about their commitment to education quality and actual education quality, resources for education quality assurance, financial revenues and expenditures (collectively referred to as quality assurance information) on their websites in June every year. To assess the quality of accountability of higher education institutions through this disclosure mechanism, the authors have studied the status of information disclosure of 107 Vietnamese higher education institutions. The evaluation is focused on the timeliness, completeness, transparency in publicizing the quality of education information. The research results show that there is a clear difference in public implementation, which is reflected in 3 main results: First: There is irregularity and incompleteness of the implementation of accountability, the number of non-implementation rate is quite high. Second: The disclosure of information is fully implemented by some groups of universities only. The results of One-Way ANOVA test on the mean difference between groups of universities showed that there was a difference with statistical significance p < 0.05. This proves that there is a difference between the groups of universities studied in the implementation of accountability through the mechanism of quality assurance information disclosure.","PeriodicalId":111674,"journal":{"name":"VNU Journal of Science: Education Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VNU Journal of Science: Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1159/vnuer.4731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improving accountability in university autonomy is a trend of countries with advanced university governance in the world. The higher the degree of autonomy, the higher the transparency and accountability of activities in educational institutions is required. This brings sustainability to the autonomy mechanism, giving stakeholders confidence in the educational institution itself. On December 28, 2017, the Ministry of Education and Training issued Circular 36/2017/TT-BGDDT promulgating the Regulation on public implementation for education and training institutions under the national education system. This Circular requires educational institutions to publicize information about their commitment to education quality and actual education quality, resources for education quality assurance, financial revenues and expenditures (collectively referred to as quality assurance information) on their websites in June every year. To assess the quality of accountability of higher education institutions through this disclosure mechanism, the authors have studied the status of information disclosure of 107 Vietnamese higher education institutions. The evaluation is focused on the timeliness, completeness, transparency in publicizing the quality of education information. The research results show that there is a clear difference in public implementation, which is reflected in 3 main results: First: There is irregularity and incompleteness of the implementation of accountability, the number of non-implementation rate is quite high. Second: The disclosure of information is fully implemented by some groups of universities only. The results of One-Way ANOVA test on the mean difference between groups of universities showed that there was a difference with statistical significance p < 0.05. This proves that there is a difference between the groups of universities studied in the implementation of accountability through the mechanism of quality assurance information disclosure.
通过公布的质量保证信息评估大学的责任
提高大学自治问责制是世界上大学治理先进国家的发展趋势。自治程度越高,对教育机构活动的透明度和问责制要求就越高。这为自治机制带来了可持续性,使利益相关者对教育机构本身充满信心。2017年12月28日,教育培训部发布第36/2017/TT-BGDDT号文,公布《国家教育系统教育培训机构公共实施规定》。本通知要求,各教育机构应于每年6月在其网站上公布其对教育质量的承诺和实际教育质量、教育质量保障资源、财政收支等信息(统称质量保障信息)。为了通过这一披露机制来评估高等教育机构的问责质量,作者对越南107所高等教育机构的信息披露现状进行了研究。评估的重点是公布教育信息质量的及时性、完整性和透明度。研究结果表明,公共执行存在明显差异,主要体现在3个方面:一是问责执行存在不规范、不完备的情况,不执行率较高。第二,信息公开仅在部分高校群体中全面实施。各大学组间均数差异的单因素方差分析结果显示,差异有统计学意义p < 0.05。这证明了所研究的高校群体在通过质量保证信息披露机制实施问责方面存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信