FINDING HUMAN RIGHTS CONSENSUS: INDONESIA AS CONSTRUCTIVE FORCE IN AICHR

Dinna Prapto Raharja
{"title":"FINDING HUMAN RIGHTS CONSENSUS: INDONESIA AS CONSTRUCTIVE FORCE IN AICHR","authors":"Dinna Prapto Raharja","doi":"10.36859/jdg.v7i01.955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Finding consensus has been argued as a stumbling block for actions in ASEAN, including in ASEAN�s Human Rights Body: the AICHR (ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights). While past studies discussed the limits of consensus making in ASEAN, there is lacunae of research on the institutional performance pressure to get things done in an intergovernmental setting and the impacts of diverse mandates among AICHR Representatives to finding human rights consensus. There are at least four types of approaches that has been employed by AICHR Representatives to find consensus where the constructivist and pragmatist collided, but it becomes clear that the challenge is cross-sectoral rather than merely internal AICHR, which makes it imperative to assess the direction for ASEAN�s institutional performance when evaluating consensus building.","PeriodicalId":442298,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Dinamika Global","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Dinamika Global","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36859/jdg.v7i01.955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Finding consensus has been argued as a stumbling block for actions in ASEAN, including in ASEAN�s Human Rights Body: the AICHR (ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights). While past studies discussed the limits of consensus making in ASEAN, there is lacunae of research on the institutional performance pressure to get things done in an intergovernmental setting and the impacts of diverse mandates among AICHR Representatives to finding human rights consensus. There are at least four types of approaches that has been employed by AICHR Representatives to find consensus where the constructivist and pragmatist collided, but it becomes clear that the challenge is cross-sectoral rather than merely internal AICHR, which makes it imperative to assess the direction for ASEAN�s institutional performance when evaluating consensus building.
寻求人权共识:印度尼西亚作为国际人权委员会的建设性力量
寻求共识一直被认为是在东盟采取行动的绊脚石,包括在东盟人权机构:东盟政府间人权委员会(AICHR)。虽然过去的研究讨论了东盟达成共识的局限性,但缺乏对在政府间环境中完成工作的机构绩效压力以及AICHR代表之间不同任务对寻求人权共识的影响的研究。AICHR代表们至少采用了四种方法,在建构主义者和实用主义者发生冲突的地方找到共识,但很明显,挑战是跨部门的,而不仅仅是AICHR内部的,这使得在评估共识建立时,必须评估东盟机构表现的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信