Assessment of Endothelial Reactivity using Brachial Pulse Wave Velocity Response to Shear

N. Sudarsan, Rahul Manoj, V. R. Kiran, P. Nabeel, Dinu S. Chandran, J. Joseph
{"title":"Assessment of Endothelial Reactivity using Brachial Pulse Wave Velocity Response to Shear","authors":"N. Sudarsan, Rahul Manoj, V. R. Kiran, P. Nabeel, Dinu S. Chandran, J. Joseph","doi":"10.1109/MeMeA57477.2023.10171899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-invasive assessment of endothelial reactivity (ER) is done by analyzing the relative change in brachial artery diameter in response to transient forearm ischemia. However, confounding factors such as flow velocity that mediates to dilation of the artery are not considered while calculating the ER index (FMD%). Therefore, we propose a technique for the assessment of ER using the measurement of local pulse wave velocity (PWV) during reactive hyperemia (RH). Continuous diameter and flow velocity were recorded on 10 healthy subjects during baseline, RH and recovery phases and corresponding PWV was calculated using the flow-area (QA) and ln(diameter)-velocity (DU) method. After $54\\pm 32s$ of cuff release, PWV increased to 35.53% and 18.45% compared to baseline, and recovered to 45.6% and 55.62% from RH in $78\\pm 16s$ for both QA and DU methods. The study was repeated for 2 consecutive days. Repeatable diameter and flow measurements were obtained $(ICC 0.6)$. There existed a significant mean difference in estimation of PWV using QA and DU methods $(P0.05)$. The ICC for PWV derived ER was 30% higher than FMD%. Hence, analyzing temporal response of local PWV to ischemia is a reliable technique for assessment of ER. Direct methods for evaluating PWV during the course of the experiment can be a potential and simpler technique for assessment of ER.","PeriodicalId":191927,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA57477.2023.10171899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-invasive assessment of endothelial reactivity (ER) is done by analyzing the relative change in brachial artery diameter in response to transient forearm ischemia. However, confounding factors such as flow velocity that mediates to dilation of the artery are not considered while calculating the ER index (FMD%). Therefore, we propose a technique for the assessment of ER using the measurement of local pulse wave velocity (PWV) during reactive hyperemia (RH). Continuous diameter and flow velocity were recorded on 10 healthy subjects during baseline, RH and recovery phases and corresponding PWV was calculated using the flow-area (QA) and ln(diameter)-velocity (DU) method. After $54\pm 32s$ of cuff release, PWV increased to 35.53% and 18.45% compared to baseline, and recovered to 45.6% and 55.62% from RH in $78\pm 16s$ for both QA and DU methods. The study was repeated for 2 consecutive days. Repeatable diameter and flow measurements were obtained $(ICC 0.6)$. There existed a significant mean difference in estimation of PWV using QA and DU methods $(P0.05)$. The ICC for PWV derived ER was 30% higher than FMD%. Hence, analyzing temporal response of local PWV to ischemia is a reliable technique for assessment of ER. Direct methods for evaluating PWV during the course of the experiment can be a potential and simpler technique for assessment of ER.
利用肱脉搏波速度对剪切的反应评估内皮反应性
内皮反应性(ER)的无创评估是通过分析臂动脉直径在短暂性前臂缺血反应中的相对变化来完成的。然而,在计算内质网指数(FMD%)时,没有考虑诸如介导动脉扩张的血流速度等混杂因素。因此,我们提出了一种在反应性充血(RH)期间测量局部脉冲波速度(PWV)来评估ER的技术。记录10名健康受试者在基线、RH和恢复阶段的连续直径和流速,并采用流面积(QA)和ln(直径)-速度(DU)法计算相应的PWV。在54\pm 32s$的袖带释放后,与基线相比,PWV增加到35.53%和18.45%,在78\pm 16s$的QA和DU方法中,PWV从RH恢复到45.6%和55.62%。研究连续重复2天。可重复的直径和流量测量得到$(ICC 0.6)$。使用QA和DU方法估计PWV有显著的平均差异(P0.05)。PWV衍生ER的ICC比口蹄疫%高30%。因此,分析局部PWV对缺血的时间反应是评估ER的可靠技术。在实验过程中直接评估PWV的方法可能是评估ER的一种潜在的和更简单的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信