Region-specific calibration of resistance factors for use with static and wave equation analyses of driven piles

Y. Bougataya, A. Stuedlein
{"title":"Region-specific calibration of resistance factors for use with static and wave equation analyses of driven piles","authors":"Y. Bougataya, A. Stuedlein","doi":"10.1080/19375247.2017.1295195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, resistance factors for the wave equation analysis of piles (WEAP) and a commonly used static analysis (SA) method are calibrated for use with piles driven in the Puget Sound Lowlands. Resistance factors are calibrated using a database of dynamic pile load test data with 95 piles monitored at the end-of-drive (EOD) condition and 94 piles monitored at the beginning-of-restrike (BOR) condition. Capacities are estimated using stress wave measurements collected with the pile driving analyzer (PDA) and interpreted using the CAse Pile Wave Analysis Program (CAPWAP) signal-matching procedure. The accuracy and uncertainty associated with the selected SA method was evaluated, along with WEAP bearing graph analyses for two alternative approaches for the estimate of per cent shaft resistance: (1) that computed from CAPWAP, and (2) that computed using the selected SA method. In general, the WEAP-based estimates of capacity were relatively accurate on average, with coefficients of variation ranging from 26 to 42%, whereas the selected SA method produced coefficient of variations as high as 85%. When compared to the AASHTO (2014, LRFD bridge design specifications. 7th edn. Washington, DC: AASHTO) recommended resistance factors that are based on a national database, the region-specific resistance factors based on WEAP at EOD increased by about 50% to 0.67 and 0.65 for the CAWAP and SA-based per cent shaft resistances, respectively. The resistance factors calibrated for the WEAP capacity estimates at the BOR condition were 0.53 and 0.46, lower than at EOD in part because of the transformation error associated with the use of dynamic loading tests for a long-term static capacity. Owing to its larger variability, the resistance factors calibrated for the selected SA method were significantly lower. The study described in this paper illustrates the benefit of using a high-quality, region-specific database for calibration of resistance factors.","PeriodicalId":272645,"journal":{"name":"DFI Journal - The Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute","volume":"139 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DFI Journal - The Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19375247.2017.1295195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this study, resistance factors for the wave equation analysis of piles (WEAP) and a commonly used static analysis (SA) method are calibrated for use with piles driven in the Puget Sound Lowlands. Resistance factors are calibrated using a database of dynamic pile load test data with 95 piles monitored at the end-of-drive (EOD) condition and 94 piles monitored at the beginning-of-restrike (BOR) condition. Capacities are estimated using stress wave measurements collected with the pile driving analyzer (PDA) and interpreted using the CAse Pile Wave Analysis Program (CAPWAP) signal-matching procedure. The accuracy and uncertainty associated with the selected SA method was evaluated, along with WEAP bearing graph analyses for two alternative approaches for the estimate of per cent shaft resistance: (1) that computed from CAPWAP, and (2) that computed using the selected SA method. In general, the WEAP-based estimates of capacity were relatively accurate on average, with coefficients of variation ranging from 26 to 42%, whereas the selected SA method produced coefficient of variations as high as 85%. When compared to the AASHTO (2014, LRFD bridge design specifications. 7th edn. Washington, DC: AASHTO) recommended resistance factors that are based on a national database, the region-specific resistance factors based on WEAP at EOD increased by about 50% to 0.67 and 0.65 for the CAWAP and SA-based per cent shaft resistances, respectively. The resistance factors calibrated for the WEAP capacity estimates at the BOR condition were 0.53 and 0.46, lower than at EOD in part because of the transformation error associated with the use of dynamic loading tests for a long-term static capacity. Owing to its larger variability, the resistance factors calibrated for the selected SA method were significantly lower. The study described in this paper illustrates the benefit of using a high-quality, region-specific database for calibration of resistance factors.
打入桩静力和波动方程分析中阻力系数的区域特定校准
在本研究中,对普吉特海湾低地打桩时使用的桩波方程分析(WEAP)的阻力系数和常用的静力分析(SA)方法进行了校准。利用动态桩荷载试验数据数据库对阻力系数进行了校准,其中95根桩在打桩结束(EOD)状态下进行了监测,94根桩在重新打桩开始(BOR)状态下进行了监测。利用打桩分析仪(PDA)收集的应力波测量值估计承载力,并使用CAse桩波分析程序(CAPWAP)信号匹配程序进行解释。评估了与所选SA方法相关的准确性和不确定性,以及WEAP轴承图分析了估算轴阻力百分比的两种替代方法:(1)从CAPWAP计算,(2)使用所选SA方法计算。一般来说,基于武器的能力估计平均相对准确,变异系数在26%到42%之间,而选择的SA方法产生的变异系数高达85%。当与AASHTO (2014) LRFD桥梁设计规范进行比较时。第七版。华盛顿特区:AASHTO)推荐了基于国家数据库的阻力系数,在EOD时,基于WEAP的区域特定阻力系数分别增加了约50%,达到0.67和0.65,而基于CAWAP和sa的竖井阻力分别为0.65。在BOR条件下,WEAP容量估算的阻力系数分别为0.53和0.46,低于EOD条件下的阻力系数,部分原因是由于使用动态加载测试进行长期静态容量时存在转换误差。由于其较大的变异性,所选择的SA方法校准的阻力因子显着降低。本文中描述的研究说明了使用高质量,特定区域数据库校准电阻因子的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信