[Cytotoxic effects of restorative materials on early passage cultured cells derived from human gingiva (in vitro)].

N Yamagata, H Oshima
{"title":"[Cytotoxic effects of restorative materials on early passage cultured cells derived from human gingiva (in vitro)].","authors":"N Yamagata,&nbsp;H Oshima","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the cytotoxic effects of three common restorative materials on early passage cultured cells derived from human gingiva (HG cells). Other early passage cultured cells derived from human dental pulp tissues (HP cells) and L cells established obtained from mouse subcutaneous tissues, were also examined. Cytotoxicity was assessed according to the uptake of neutral red and dye exclusion with nigrosin. The cytotoxicity was in the order of glass ionomer cement (highest), light cured composite resin and dental amalgam. HG cells were the least sensitive to the materials tested. Both filtration of extracts and addition of serum into the extract affected the cytotoxicity. Glass ionomer cement increased the acidity of the extract, but the two other materials did not. Dissolution of metal ions, aluminium, tin, copper, mercury and zinc occurred from the materials. The extract of the composite resin had a different absorbance. This study disclosed differences in the cellular reaction to the restorative materials. Thus, utilization of early passage cultured cells is necessary for biological evaluation of the dental materials in vitro.</p>","PeriodicalId":77622,"journal":{"name":"Shika zairyo, kikai = Journal of the Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices","volume":"9 4","pages":"541-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shika zairyo, kikai = Journal of the Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the cytotoxic effects of three common restorative materials on early passage cultured cells derived from human gingiva (HG cells). Other early passage cultured cells derived from human dental pulp tissues (HP cells) and L cells established obtained from mouse subcutaneous tissues, were also examined. Cytotoxicity was assessed according to the uptake of neutral red and dye exclusion with nigrosin. The cytotoxicity was in the order of glass ionomer cement (highest), light cured composite resin and dental amalgam. HG cells were the least sensitive to the materials tested. Both filtration of extracts and addition of serum into the extract affected the cytotoxicity. Glass ionomer cement increased the acidity of the extract, but the two other materials did not. Dissolution of metal ions, aluminium, tin, copper, mercury and zinc occurred from the materials. The extract of the composite resin had a different absorbance. This study disclosed differences in the cellular reaction to the restorative materials. Thus, utilization of early passage cultured cells is necessary for biological evaluation of the dental materials in vitro.

[修复材料对人牙龈早期传代培养细胞的细胞毒性作用(体外)]。
本研究评估了三种常见修复材料对人类牙龈早期传代培养细胞(HG细胞)的细胞毒性作用。其他来源于人牙髓组织的早期培养细胞(HP细胞)和来自小鼠皮下组织的L细胞也被检测。通过对中性红的吸收和黑素对染料的排斥来评估细胞毒性。细胞毒性依次为玻璃离子水门合剂、光固化复合树脂和牙汞合金。HG细胞对所测材料最不敏感。提取液的过滤和血清的加入对细胞毒性均有影响。玻璃离子水门汀增加了提取物的酸度,但其他两种材料没有。金属离子、铝、锡、铜、汞和锌从材料中溶解。复合树脂提取液具有不同的吸光度。本研究揭示了细胞对修复材料反应的差异。因此,利用早期传代培养细胞对牙材料进行体外生物学评价是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书