[Study on the porcelain veneer restoration. 3. Effect of various treatments of porcelain surface on the bonding strength at porcelain-resin interface].

Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai shi Pub Date : 1990-06-01
M Kondo, M Ikeda, N Takeuchi, K Kanamori, K Kamiya, A Gomi, T Asai, A Senda
{"title":"[Study on the porcelain veneer restoration. 3. Effect of various treatments of porcelain surface on the bonding strength at porcelain-resin interface].","authors":"M Kondo,&nbsp;M Ikeda,&nbsp;N Takeuchi,&nbsp;K Kanamori,&nbsp;K Kamiya,&nbsp;A Gomi,&nbsp;T Asai,&nbsp;A Senda","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a previous report, observations were made on the apporopriate concentrations of hydrofluoric acid and durations of application in treating porcelain surfaces to improve the bonding strength at the porcelain-resin interface. Particular concentrations and durations were found, such as 4%, 6 min. for Supper Porcelain AAA, 8%, 6 min. for VMK 68, and 6%, 3 min. for Cosmotech Porcelain, and it was clearly shown that hydrofluoric acid treatment was the most effective treatment for porcelain-resin micro-mechanical bonding. However, because of its strong corrosive action, the use of hydrofluoric acid is very dangerous, and it must be handled with extreme care even in the laboratory. Accordingly, there is a need to find a safer and more effective way of treating porcelain surfaces, particularly in the field of interoral repairs to fractured porcelain restoratives by means of porcelain-resin micro-mechanical bonding. In the present study, 2% acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF), which corrodes the surface of porcelain restoratives, PorceLock (PL), which is a 2.5% buffered hydrofluoric acid made by DenMat Co. and a 6% hydrofluoric acid (HF) preparations were applied to the surface of porcelain specimens and the resulting effects on treated porcelain surfaces were examined by means of SEM observations and shear bonding strength tests. The following results were obtained: 1. In comparison with control specimens which were not treated with any acids or fluoride, a much higher bonding strength at the porcelain-resin interface was obtained in the specimens treated with 2% APF, PL and 6% HF. 2. Regarding to SEM observations, both of the specimens treated 6% HF or PL showed extremely micro-porous surfaces.2+ surfaces of the</p>","PeriodicalId":75458,"journal":{"name":"Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai shi","volume":"28 2","pages":"631-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai shi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a previous report, observations were made on the apporopriate concentrations of hydrofluoric acid and durations of application in treating porcelain surfaces to improve the bonding strength at the porcelain-resin interface. Particular concentrations and durations were found, such as 4%, 6 min. for Supper Porcelain AAA, 8%, 6 min. for VMK 68, and 6%, 3 min. for Cosmotech Porcelain, and it was clearly shown that hydrofluoric acid treatment was the most effective treatment for porcelain-resin micro-mechanical bonding. However, because of its strong corrosive action, the use of hydrofluoric acid is very dangerous, and it must be handled with extreme care even in the laboratory. Accordingly, there is a need to find a safer and more effective way of treating porcelain surfaces, particularly in the field of interoral repairs to fractured porcelain restoratives by means of porcelain-resin micro-mechanical bonding. In the present study, 2% acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF), which corrodes the surface of porcelain restoratives, PorceLock (PL), which is a 2.5% buffered hydrofluoric acid made by DenMat Co. and a 6% hydrofluoric acid (HF) preparations were applied to the surface of porcelain specimens and the resulting effects on treated porcelain surfaces were examined by means of SEM observations and shear bonding strength tests. The following results were obtained: 1. In comparison with control specimens which were not treated with any acids or fluoride, a much higher bonding strength at the porcelain-resin interface was obtained in the specimens treated with 2% APF, PL and 6% HF. 2. Regarding to SEM observations, both of the specimens treated 6% HF or PL showed extremely micro-porous surfaces.2+ surfaces of the

瓷贴面修复的研究。3.不同表面处理对瓷-树脂界面结合强度的影响[j]。
在之前的一份报告中,研究人员观察了氢氟酸在处理瓷器表面时的适当浓度和应用时间,以提高瓷器-树脂界面的结合强度。不同浓度和时间的氢氟酸处理,如:Supper Porcelain AAA为4%,6分钟;VMK 68为8%,6分钟;Cosmotech Porcelain为6%,3分钟。结果表明,氢氟酸处理是陶瓷-树脂微机械结合最有效的处理方法。但是,由于氢氟酸具有很强的腐蚀作用,使用它是非常危险的,即使在实验室中也必须极其小心地处理。因此,需要寻找一种更安全、更有效的处理瓷表面的方法,特别是在瓷修复体断裂的口腔内修复领域,采用瓷-树脂微机械结合的方法。在本研究中,将腐蚀瓷修复剂表面的2%酸化氟化磷酸(APF), DenMat公司生产的2.5%缓冲氢氟酸的PorceLock (PL)和6%氢氟酸(HF)制剂应用于瓷样品表面,并通过扫描电镜观察和剪切结合强度测试来检测其对处理过的瓷表面的影响。得到了以下结果:1。与未加任何酸或氟处理的对照试样相比,2% APF、PL和6% HF处理的试样在瓷-树脂界面处获得了更高的结合强度。2. 通过扫描电镜观察,6% HF和6% PL处理的样品表面都有极微孔。2+表面的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信