KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN AGRIBUSINESS FIRMS

C. Paul
{"title":"KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN AGRIBUSINESS FIRMS","authors":"C. Paul","doi":"10.47941/ejikm.851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Rice farming has immense scope in sustaining the livelihood of millions of farmers. Being a diverse ecological and socially background country, Kenya is lagging behind the developed countries in agriculture sectors. To manage all the knowledge available in public, as well as private domain, it needs to integrate and make it accessible to all the stakeholders of agriculture, especially farmers. \nMethodology: Research carried out in 2011 in Kirinyaga district, Kenya, shows how sense-making theory and methodology can be used to assess the use of local agricultural and external knowledge by small-scale farmers and its effects on small-scale agriculture. Two knowledge systems, the local knowledge system and the external or scientific knowledge system, are considered dominant. The two systems can be synergistic and small-scale farmers have mixed them in their farming activities. Blending systems improve communication, livelihoods, and economies within local communities, and increases their participation in development. Data were collected in focus group discussions with farmers' groups and interviews with individual farmers. \nResults: Results show that most farmers in Kirinyaga use external agricultural information in their farming practices. A significant number use combined external agricultural information and local knowledge, which forms a third knowledge system. This third system requires the validation of the farmers' innovations and documentation of the knowledge for wider dissemination. \nUnique contribution to theory, practice and policy: Information providers should adopt policies that promote the use of the three knowledge systems by small-scale farmers. The study was conducted in a single agribusiness chain. Future studies may look at another method of knowledge management assessment to see if the results will be similar. The results can contribute to the development of programs and policies, incorporating knowledge management into agribusiness as a competitive strategy.","PeriodicalId":154013,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Information and Knowledge Management","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Information and Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47941/ejikm.851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Rice farming has immense scope in sustaining the livelihood of millions of farmers. Being a diverse ecological and socially background country, Kenya is lagging behind the developed countries in agriculture sectors. To manage all the knowledge available in public, as well as private domain, it needs to integrate and make it accessible to all the stakeholders of agriculture, especially farmers. Methodology: Research carried out in 2011 in Kirinyaga district, Kenya, shows how sense-making theory and methodology can be used to assess the use of local agricultural and external knowledge by small-scale farmers and its effects on small-scale agriculture. Two knowledge systems, the local knowledge system and the external or scientific knowledge system, are considered dominant. The two systems can be synergistic and small-scale farmers have mixed them in their farming activities. Blending systems improve communication, livelihoods, and economies within local communities, and increases their participation in development. Data were collected in focus group discussions with farmers' groups and interviews with individual farmers. Results: Results show that most farmers in Kirinyaga use external agricultural information in their farming practices. A significant number use combined external agricultural information and local knowledge, which forms a third knowledge system. This third system requires the validation of the farmers' innovations and documentation of the knowledge for wider dissemination. Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: Information providers should adopt policies that promote the use of the three knowledge systems by small-scale farmers. The study was conducted in a single agribusiness chain. Future studies may look at another method of knowledge management assessment to see if the results will be similar. The results can contribute to the development of programs and policies, incorporating knowledge management into agribusiness as a competitive strategy.
农业企业的知识管理实践
目的:水稻种植在维持数百万农民生计方面具有巨大的作用。肯尼亚是一个生态和社会背景多样化的国家,在农业方面落后于发达国家。为了管理公共领域和私人领域的所有知识,它需要整合并使所有农业利益攸关方,特别是农民能够使用。方法:2011年在肯尼亚Kirinyaga地区开展的研究显示了如何使用意义构建理论和方法来评估小农对当地农业和外部知识的利用及其对小农的影响。两种知识系统,即局部知识系统和外部或科学知识系统,被认为占主导地位。这两种系统可以协同作用,小农在其农业活动中将它们混合在一起。混合系统改善了当地社区的通信、生计和经济,并增加了他们对发展的参与。数据是通过与农民团体的焦点小组讨论和对个别农民的访谈收集的。结果:结果表明,Kirinyaga的大多数农民在其耕作实践中使用外部农业信息。相当一部分人将外部农业信息与本地知识相结合,形成了第三种知识体系。这第三个系统需要对农民的创新进行验证,并记录知识,以便更广泛地传播。对理论、实践和政策的独特贡献:信息提供者应采取促进小农使用这三种知识系统的政策。这项研究是在一个单一的农业综合企业链中进行的。未来的研究可能会着眼于另一种知识管理评估方法,看看结果是否相似。研究结果有助于制定计划和政策,将知识管理作为一种竞争战略纳入农业综合企业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信