P94 Influenza and COVID-19 pneumonia: the difference is pulmonary hypertension

S. Desai, A. Devaraj, S. Dintakurti, C. Mahon, S. Padley, S. Singh, B. Rawal, C. Ridge, T. Semple
{"title":"P94 Influenza and COVID-19 pneumonia: the difference is pulmonary hypertension","authors":"S. Desai, A. Devaraj, S. Dintakurti, C. Mahon, S. Padley, S. Singh, B. Rawal, C. Ridge, T. Semple","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeTo describe the incidence of pulmonary artery thrombosis in COVID-19 versus influenza pneumonia using CT angiography and to assess whether it may increase the risk of pulmonary hypertension.Materials and MethodsSingle and dual energy CT pulmonary angiography of age- and gender-matched patients with influenza and COVID-19 pneumonia, referred for extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and/or mechanical ventilation from January 2016 to January 2021, were retrospectively evaluated. Two independent observers qualitatively and quantitively assessed clot burden and Qanadli CT Obstruction Index. Two consensus observers calculated pulmonary artery volume and right to left ventricular diameter ratio (Terarecon, California, USA) to diagnose pulmonary hypertension. Pulmonary infarct volume and perfused blood volume relative enhancement were also calculated (Syngo via, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany). All radiologic parameters were correlated with clinical data. To assess if in situ thrombosis could be visualised on CT, isolated segmental and subsegmental filling defects were used as an imaging surrogate. For statistical analyses, Graphpad Prism9 and IBM SPSS v27.0 software were used.ResultsThe incidence of either central PE or DVT was equal between patients with COVID-19 and influenza pneumonia (20%). The incidence of isolated segmental and subsegmental filling defects was higher in COVID-19 but without statistical significance (44% vs 32%;p=0.5607). Right to left ventricular diameter and pulmonary artery to aorta ratios were higher in COVID-19 compared to influenza (1.01 vs 0.866 and 1.04 vs 0.904;p=0.0071 and p=0.0023, respectively).ConclusionIn a comparable group of patients with severe COVID-19 and influenza pneumonia, CT features of pulmonary hypertension are more often present in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia despite an equal clot burden on CT. This is not attributable to pulmonary thrombosis visible on CT and supports the hypothesis that micro- rather than macrovascular obstruction is the cause of severe hypoxia in COVID-19 pneumonia.","PeriodicalId":266318,"journal":{"name":"COVID-19: clinical features and risk","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COVID-19: clinical features and risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeTo describe the incidence of pulmonary artery thrombosis in COVID-19 versus influenza pneumonia using CT angiography and to assess whether it may increase the risk of pulmonary hypertension.Materials and MethodsSingle and dual energy CT pulmonary angiography of age- and gender-matched patients with influenza and COVID-19 pneumonia, referred for extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and/or mechanical ventilation from January 2016 to January 2021, were retrospectively evaluated. Two independent observers qualitatively and quantitively assessed clot burden and Qanadli CT Obstruction Index. Two consensus observers calculated pulmonary artery volume and right to left ventricular diameter ratio (Terarecon, California, USA) to diagnose pulmonary hypertension. Pulmonary infarct volume and perfused blood volume relative enhancement were also calculated (Syngo via, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany). All radiologic parameters were correlated with clinical data. To assess if in situ thrombosis could be visualised on CT, isolated segmental and subsegmental filling defects were used as an imaging surrogate. For statistical analyses, Graphpad Prism9 and IBM SPSS v27.0 software were used.ResultsThe incidence of either central PE or DVT was equal between patients with COVID-19 and influenza pneumonia (20%). The incidence of isolated segmental and subsegmental filling defects was higher in COVID-19 but without statistical significance (44% vs 32%;p=0.5607). Right to left ventricular diameter and pulmonary artery to aorta ratios were higher in COVID-19 compared to influenza (1.01 vs 0.866 and 1.04 vs 0.904;p=0.0071 and p=0.0023, respectively).ConclusionIn a comparable group of patients with severe COVID-19 and influenza pneumonia, CT features of pulmonary hypertension are more often present in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia despite an equal clot burden on CT. This is not attributable to pulmonary thrombosis visible on CT and supports the hypothesis that micro- rather than macrovascular obstruction is the cause of severe hypoxia in COVID-19 pneumonia.
P94流感与COVID-19肺炎:区别在于肺动脉高压
目的利用CT血管造影分析新冠肺炎患者与流感肺炎患者肺动脉血栓形成的发生率,并评估其是否会增加肺动脉高压的发生风险。材料与方法回顾性评价2016年1月至2021年1月期间,年龄和性别匹配的流感和COVID-19肺炎患者进行体外膜氧合(ECMO)和/或机械通气的单能量和双能量CT肺血管造影。两名独立观察员定性和定量评估血块负担和Qanadli CT阻塞指数。两名共识观察员计算肺动脉体积和左右心室直径比(Terarecon, California, USA)来诊断肺动脉高压。同时计算肺梗死体积和灌注血容量相对增强(Syngo via, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany)。所有放射学参数均与临床资料相关。为了评估原位血栓是否可以在CT上显示,孤立的节段和亚节段填充缺陷被用作成像替代。统计学分析采用Graphpad Prism9和IBM SPSS v27.0软件。结果COVID-19患者与流感肺炎患者中心性PE或DVT的发生率相等(20%)。孤立节段缺损和亚节段缺损在COVID-19组的发生率较高,但差异无统计学意义(44% vs 32%;p=0.5607)。与流感相比,COVID-19患者的右心室与左心室直径和肺动脉与主动脉的比值更高(分别为1.01 vs 0.866和1.04 vs 0.904;p=0.0071和p=0.0023)。结论在一组重症COVID-19和流行性感冒肺炎患者中,尽管CT上血块负担相等,但COVID-19肺炎患者更常出现肺动脉高压的CT特征。这不能归因于CT上可见的肺血栓形成,并支持了微血管阻塞而不是大血管阻塞是COVID-19肺炎严重缺氧的原因的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信