UMA ANÁLISE SOBRE ASPECTOS DA HISTORIOGRAFIA DA ESCRAVIDÃO BRASILEIRA PÓS-1980: permanências, mudanças e matizes no interior dessa tendência

Luís Claudio Palermo
{"title":"UMA ANÁLISE SOBRE ASPECTOS DA HISTORIOGRAFIA DA ESCRAVIDÃO BRASILEIRA PÓS-1980: permanências, mudanças e matizes no interior dessa tendência","authors":"Luís Claudio Palermo","doi":"10.22264/clio.issn2525-5649.2019.37.2.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is to examine two important books for the historiography of Brazilian slavery of the period after the 1980s. The discussion is based on two references: the first is the appreciation of the contextual perspective of a work; the second is the relational view between synchrony and diachrony. In this sense, the article both highlights the brand that the two books print in their period, as well as highlights the dialogues they have with the previous historiographical tradition. As a result, two important points are defended in the article: the ruptures promoted by the historiography of post-1980 slavery did not eliminate theoretical and interpretive differences in their own interior; the changes propounded by this historiographical tendency were not completely and absolutely carried out, since elements of permanence can, to some extent, be identified.","PeriodicalId":346865,"journal":{"name":"CLIO: Revista de Pesquisa Histórica","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLIO: Revista de Pesquisa Histórica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22264/clio.issn2525-5649.2019.37.2.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the article is to examine two important books for the historiography of Brazilian slavery of the period after the 1980s. The discussion is based on two references: the first is the appreciation of the contextual perspective of a work; the second is the relational view between synchrony and diachrony. In this sense, the article both highlights the brand that the two books print in their period, as well as highlights the dialogues they have with the previous historiographical tradition. As a result, two important points are defended in the article: the ruptures promoted by the historiography of post-1980 slavery did not eliminate theoretical and interpretive differences in their own interior; the changes propounded by this historiographical tendency were not completely and absolutely carried out, since elements of permanence can, to some extent, be identified.
对1980年后巴西奴隶制史学方面的分析:这一趋势中的连续性、变化和细微差别
这篇文章的目的是研究20世纪80年代后巴西奴隶制历史编纂的两本重要书籍。讨论基于两个参考文献:第一是对作品的语境视角的欣赏;二是共时性与历时性的关系观。从这个意义上说,文章既突出了这两本书所处时代的烙印,也突出了它们与以往史学传统的对话。因此,本文捍卫了两个重要的观点:1980年后奴隶制史学所推动的破裂并没有消除其内部的理论和解释差异;这种史学倾向所提出的变化并没有完全和绝对地实现,因为在某种程度上,可以确定永恒的要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信