Evaluation of Subclinical Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction By Global Longitudinal Strain Using 2D Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Angina With Normal Epicardial Coronary Arteries

C. M. Ahmed, D. M. F. Osmany, Mohammad Nizamul Hossain Sowdagar, S. Banerjee, M. Hoque
{"title":"Evaluation of Subclinical Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction By Global Longitudinal Strain Using 2D Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Angina With Normal Epicardial Coronary Arteries","authors":"C. M. Ahmed, D. M. F. Osmany, Mohammad Nizamul Hossain Sowdagar, S. Banerjee, M. Hoque","doi":"10.15420/japsc.2022.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Global longitudinal strain (GLS), assessed by 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE), may offer a valuable non-invasive method to assess subclinical left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction in patients with chest pain but normal epicardial coronary arteries. The primary objective of the study was to detect subclinical LV systolic dysfunction by GLS using 2D-STE in patients with angina with normal coronary arteries and conventional echocardiograms at baseline. Methods: This was a comparative case–control study that included patients with complaints of an ischaemic pattern of chest pain despite normal coronary arteries (cases) and healthy individuals (controls). Resting LV systolic function was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and GLS using 2D-STE analysis. The results of all three planes in GLS (the apical four-chamber, two-chamber, and three-chamber views) were combined in a single ‘bull’s eye’ summary (agreeing with the standard 17-segment model), which presented the analysis of each segment along with a global peak systolic strain value for the LV. Results: The study included 120 participants (60 cases and 60 controls). The normal reference value of the mean GLS in the control group was −19.7 ± 1.84%. GLS assessed by 2D-STE was significantly impaired in patients with angina-like syndrome with normal epicardial coronary arteries (−18.78 ± 1.87 versus −19.7 ± 1.84%; p<0.007) compared with the control group despite preserved LV ejection fraction. In the case group, GLS reduced significantly in eight patients (13.3%) than control group. Conclusion: Patients with angina with normal epicardial coronary arteries are likely to have microvascular disease. GLS assessed by 2D-STE has the potential to improve the value of echocardiography in coronary microvascular disease detection. Despite normal LV ejection fraction, significant impairment of LV global longitudinal systolic function can differentiate a microvascular group of patients from others who have angina with normal coronaries.","PeriodicalId":321604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology","volume":"215 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/japsc.2022.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Global longitudinal strain (GLS), assessed by 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE), may offer a valuable non-invasive method to assess subclinical left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction in patients with chest pain but normal epicardial coronary arteries. The primary objective of the study was to detect subclinical LV systolic dysfunction by GLS using 2D-STE in patients with angina with normal coronary arteries and conventional echocardiograms at baseline. Methods: This was a comparative case–control study that included patients with complaints of an ischaemic pattern of chest pain despite normal coronary arteries (cases) and healthy individuals (controls). Resting LV systolic function was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and GLS using 2D-STE analysis. The results of all three planes in GLS (the apical four-chamber, two-chamber, and three-chamber views) were combined in a single ‘bull’s eye’ summary (agreeing with the standard 17-segment model), which presented the analysis of each segment along with a global peak systolic strain value for the LV. Results: The study included 120 participants (60 cases and 60 controls). The normal reference value of the mean GLS in the control group was −19.7 ± 1.84%. GLS assessed by 2D-STE was significantly impaired in patients with angina-like syndrome with normal epicardial coronary arteries (−18.78 ± 1.87 versus −19.7 ± 1.84%; p<0.007) compared with the control group despite preserved LV ejection fraction. In the case group, GLS reduced significantly in eight patients (13.3%) than control group. Conclusion: Patients with angina with normal epicardial coronary arteries are likely to have microvascular disease. GLS assessed by 2D-STE has the potential to improve the value of echocardiography in coronary microvascular disease detection. Despite normal LV ejection fraction, significant impairment of LV global longitudinal systolic function can differentiate a microvascular group of patients from others who have angina with normal coronaries.
心绞痛患者心外膜冠状动脉正常时,二维斑点跟踪超声心动图整体纵向应变评价亚临床左室收缩功能障碍
背景:通过二维斑点跟踪超声心动图(2D- ste)评估全局纵向应变(GLS),可能为评估胸痛但心外膜冠状动脉正常的患者的亚临床左室(LV)收缩功能障碍提供一种有价值的无创方法。该研究的主要目的是在冠状动脉正常的心绞痛患者和基线常规超声心动图中,通过GLS使用2D-STE检测亚临床左室收缩功能障碍。方法:这是一项比较病例对照研究,包括冠状动脉正常但有缺血性胸痛症状的患者(病例)和健康个体(对照组)。静息左室收缩功能通过经胸超声心动图和2D-STE分析GLS进行评估。GLS中所有三个平面(顶端四室、两室和三室视图)的结果合并在一个单一的“靶心”摘要中(与标准的17节段模型一致),该模型显示了每个节段的分析以及左室的全局收缩峰值应变值。结果:共纳入120例受试者(60例病例和60例对照)。对照组GLS平均值正常参考值为- 19.7±1.84%。在心绞痛样综合征心外膜冠状动脉正常的患者中,2D-STE评估的GLS明显受损(- 18.78±1.87 vs - 19.7±1.84%;p<0.007)与对照组相比,尽管左室射血分数保持不变。病例组中有8例(13.3%)患者GLS较对照组显著降低。结论:心绞痛患者心外膜冠状动脉正常时易发生微血管病变。2D-STE评估GLS有可能提高超声心动图在冠状动脉微血管疾病检测中的价值。尽管左室射血分数正常,但左室整体纵向收缩功能的显著损害可以将微血管组患者与其他冠状动脉正常的心绞痛患者区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信