{"title":"Chaperone use by obstetrician/gynecologists.","authors":"N. Johnson, E. Philipson, S. Curry","doi":"10.1097/00006254-199911000-00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo describe current practices of chaperone use during pelvic examinations among obstetrician/gynecologists affiliated with a large tertiary care teaching hospital.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nQuestionnaires were distributed at department of obstetrics and gynecology grand rounds to all practicing attending physicians to obtain physician demographic data, including age, years in practice, practice type (solo or group) and whether chaperones were currently used when performing pelvic examinations at the first obstetric or gynecologic office visit. Physicians were also asked whether they were taught to use chaperones for pelvic examinations during medical school or residency.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf the 59 attending physicians, 100% responded to the questionnaire. As compared to female physicians, male physicians used chaperones more at the first obstetric examination (76.9% vs. 27.8%, P < .002), at gynecologic office visits (70.0% vs. 22.2%, P < .002) and for breast examinations (51.2% vs. 11.1%, P < .01). Physicians greater than 40 years old, in practice longer than 10 years and taught as medical students or residents to use chaperones were statistically more likely to use chaperones. No attendings, male or female, reported losing a patient to another provider or being sued or threatened with legal action because of not using a chaperone.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nChaperones were used more frequently during pelvic examinations by male physicians, age greater than 40, solo practice, and physicians in practice longer than 10 years. Education affected current practices as specific medical student or residency training influenced the use of chaperones in private practice.","PeriodicalId":192418,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-199911000-00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To describe current practices of chaperone use during pelvic examinations among obstetrician/gynecologists affiliated with a large tertiary care teaching hospital.
STUDY DESIGN
Questionnaires were distributed at department of obstetrics and gynecology grand rounds to all practicing attending physicians to obtain physician demographic data, including age, years in practice, practice type (solo or group) and whether chaperones were currently used when performing pelvic examinations at the first obstetric or gynecologic office visit. Physicians were also asked whether they were taught to use chaperones for pelvic examinations during medical school or residency.
RESULTS
Of the 59 attending physicians, 100% responded to the questionnaire. As compared to female physicians, male physicians used chaperones more at the first obstetric examination (76.9% vs. 27.8%, P < .002), at gynecologic office visits (70.0% vs. 22.2%, P < .002) and for breast examinations (51.2% vs. 11.1%, P < .01). Physicians greater than 40 years old, in practice longer than 10 years and taught as medical students or residents to use chaperones were statistically more likely to use chaperones. No attendings, male or female, reported losing a patient to another provider or being sued or threatened with legal action because of not using a chaperone.
CONCLUSION
Chaperones were used more frequently during pelvic examinations by male physicians, age greater than 40, solo practice, and physicians in practice longer than 10 years. Education affected current practices as specific medical student or residency training influenced the use of chaperones in private practice.