Chaperone use by obstetrician/gynecologists.

N. Johnson, E. Philipson, S. Curry
{"title":"Chaperone use by obstetrician/gynecologists.","authors":"N. Johnson, E. Philipson, S. Curry","doi":"10.1097/00006254-199911000-00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo describe current practices of chaperone use during pelvic examinations among obstetrician/gynecologists affiliated with a large tertiary care teaching hospital.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nQuestionnaires were distributed at department of obstetrics and gynecology grand rounds to all practicing attending physicians to obtain physician demographic data, including age, years in practice, practice type (solo or group) and whether chaperones were currently used when performing pelvic examinations at the first obstetric or gynecologic office visit. Physicians were also asked whether they were taught to use chaperones for pelvic examinations during medical school or residency.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf the 59 attending physicians, 100% responded to the questionnaire. As compared to female physicians, male physicians used chaperones more at the first obstetric examination (76.9% vs. 27.8%, P < .002), at gynecologic office visits (70.0% vs. 22.2%, P < .002) and for breast examinations (51.2% vs. 11.1%, P < .01). Physicians greater than 40 years old, in practice longer than 10 years and taught as medical students or residents to use chaperones were statistically more likely to use chaperones. No attendings, male or female, reported losing a patient to another provider or being sued or threatened with legal action because of not using a chaperone.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nChaperones were used more frequently during pelvic examinations by male physicians, age greater than 40, solo practice, and physicians in practice longer than 10 years. Education affected current practices as specific medical student or residency training influenced the use of chaperones in private practice.","PeriodicalId":192418,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-199911000-00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To describe current practices of chaperone use during pelvic examinations among obstetrician/gynecologists affiliated with a large tertiary care teaching hospital. STUDY DESIGN Questionnaires were distributed at department of obstetrics and gynecology grand rounds to all practicing attending physicians to obtain physician demographic data, including age, years in practice, practice type (solo or group) and whether chaperones were currently used when performing pelvic examinations at the first obstetric or gynecologic office visit. Physicians were also asked whether they were taught to use chaperones for pelvic examinations during medical school or residency. RESULTS Of the 59 attending physicians, 100% responded to the questionnaire. As compared to female physicians, male physicians used chaperones more at the first obstetric examination (76.9% vs. 27.8%, P < .002), at gynecologic office visits (70.0% vs. 22.2%, P < .002) and for breast examinations (51.2% vs. 11.1%, P < .01). Physicians greater than 40 years old, in practice longer than 10 years and taught as medical students or residents to use chaperones were statistically more likely to use chaperones. No attendings, male or female, reported losing a patient to another provider or being sued or threatened with legal action because of not using a chaperone. CONCLUSION Chaperones were used more frequently during pelvic examinations by male physicians, age greater than 40, solo practice, and physicians in practice longer than 10 years. Education affected current practices as specific medical student or residency training influenced the use of chaperones in private practice.
陪同使用的产科医生/妇科医生。
目的描述某大型三级教学医院妇产科医生在骨盆检查中使用伴护的现状。研究设计:在妇产科大查房向所有执业主治医师发放问卷,以获取医师人口统计数据,包括年龄、执业年限、执业类型(单独或集体)以及首次产科或妇科门诊就诊时是否使用陪伴者进行盆腔检查。医生们还被问及在医学院或住院医师期间是否被教导使用监护人进行盆腔检查。结果59名主治医师对问卷的回答率为100%。与女医生相比,男性医生在首次产科检查(76.9%比27.8%,P < 0.002)、妇科门诊就诊(70.0%比22.2%,P < 0.002)和乳房检查(51.2%比11.1%,P < 0.01)时更多地使用陪伴者。年龄大于40岁、实习时间超过10年、作为医学生或住院医师学习使用陪护的医生在统计上更有可能使用陪护。没有一个主治医生,无论男女,报告说病人被另一个医生抢走了,或者因为没有使用陪护而被起诉或受到法律诉讼的威胁。结论年龄大于40岁、单独执业、执业时间大于10年的男性医师在盆腔检查中使用陪护者较多。教育影响了当前的实践,因为特定的医学生或住院医师培训影响了私人执业中监护人的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信