Human Rights Law in the Republic of Ireland-2008

L. Thornton
{"title":"Human Rights Law in the Republic of Ireland-2008","authors":"L. Thornton","doi":"10.5040/9781472565389.ch-009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There continued to be significant engagement with human rights issues by the Irish legislature, government and judiciary in 2008. The strengthening of the human rights of trafficking victims, lesbian, gay and bisexual men and women are worthy points of note. This must be contrasted with the continuing controversies in immigration law, the failure of the Irish Government to legislate so as to protect the rights of transgendered persons and the severe financial cutbacks imposed on the Equality Authority and the Irish Human Rights Commission. The number of cases argued before the Irish Courts on issues relating to human rights continues to rise. The judiciary have engaged in human rights disputes in a large number of areas, ranging from criminal law, family law, child law, immigration law, property law and mental health law. The incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms into Irish law has had no small part to play in the increase in human rights adjudication before the courts. As can be seen from the range of cases examined below, judicial engagement with other international human rights law instruments and treaties remains low. Nevertheless, in the area of child law at any rate, the judiciary seems more prepared to at least make reference to international legal instruments in coming to decisions, even if domestic or European human rights law can solve the issue at hand. It remains to be seen whether in future years, judicial reference to unincorporated international human rights treaties will expand.","PeriodicalId":405138,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Constitutional Law (Topic)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Constitutional Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472565389.ch-009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There continued to be significant engagement with human rights issues by the Irish legislature, government and judiciary in 2008. The strengthening of the human rights of trafficking victims, lesbian, gay and bisexual men and women are worthy points of note. This must be contrasted with the continuing controversies in immigration law, the failure of the Irish Government to legislate so as to protect the rights of transgendered persons and the severe financial cutbacks imposed on the Equality Authority and the Irish Human Rights Commission. The number of cases argued before the Irish Courts on issues relating to human rights continues to rise. The judiciary have engaged in human rights disputes in a large number of areas, ranging from criminal law, family law, child law, immigration law, property law and mental health law. The incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms into Irish law has had no small part to play in the increase in human rights adjudication before the courts. As can be seen from the range of cases examined below, judicial engagement with other international human rights law instruments and treaties remains low. Nevertheless, in the area of child law at any rate, the judiciary seems more prepared to at least make reference to international legal instruments in coming to decisions, even if domestic or European human rights law can solve the issue at hand. It remains to be seen whether in future years, judicial reference to unincorporated international human rights treaties will expand.
爱尔兰共和国人权法-2008年
2008年,爱尔兰立法机构、政府和司法部门继续积极参与人权问题。加强贩运受害者、女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋男女的人权是值得注意的问题。这必须与移民法中继续存在的争议、爱尔兰政府未能立法以保护变性人的权利以及对平等管理局和爱尔兰人权委员会施加的严重财政削减形成对比。在爱尔兰法院就与人权有关的问题辩论的案件数目继续增加。司法部门参与了从刑法、家庭法、儿童法、移民法、财产法和精神卫生法等许多领域的人权纠纷。将《欧洲人权和基本自由公约》纳入爱尔兰法律在增加法院的人权裁决方面发挥了不小的作用。从下文审查的一系列案件可以看出,司法部门参与其他国际人权法文书和条约的程度仍然很低。然而,无论如何,在儿童法领域,司法机关似乎更愿意在作出决定时至少参考国际法律文书,即使国内或欧洲人权法可以解决手头的问题。在今后几年中,司法对未纳入的国际人权条约的提及是否会扩大,还有待观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信