Student Reflective Perceptions of High School Educational Cell Phone Technology Usage

Beth Humble-Thaden
{"title":"Student Reflective Perceptions of High School Educational Cell Phone Technology Usage","authors":"Beth Humble-Thaden","doi":"10.21061/jots.v37i1.a.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High school students are prohibited from using cell phones during the school day within most public schools in the United States; the majority of students, however, maintain possession of a personal cell phone within the high school setting. Most administrators and teachers regard cell phone possession and usage as a negative distraction and deterrent to learning rather than as an educational learning tool. This study investigates college freshman students’ reflective perceptions of potential high school utilization of cell phones by students and teachers as educational learning tools. Positive response from surveys suggests there is interest in and potential for educational implementation and use of cell phones as learning tools in schools. Perceptional gender differences were uncovered suggesting further study is necessary before successful implementation can occur. School policy regarding cell phones, within the majority of public schools in the United States, is generally quite prohibitive and requires students to leave their cell phones at home or turn them off and leave them in their lockers during the school day (Obringer & Coffey, 2007). Other schools report changing policy from banning cell phone use to allowing students to use them before or after school (St. Gerard, 2006). As a result of the rapidly occurring technological advances within the cell phone industry, schools have been hard pressed to make and keep current educational policy regarding the use of cell phones (Obringer & Coffey, 2007). Students’ personal and social cell phone use has been well established, but how do high school students reflect on the usage of such phones in an educational setting? Determining student perception toward using the educational technological capabilities of cell phones within a learning environment is a first step. Knowledge of students’ attitudes could possibly lead to, aid in, and influence future decision making regarding the implementation of cell phone use for academic purposes within high school classrooms. Literature Review Administrators and teachers often regard the use of cell phones by students at school as a deterrent to student learning (Johnson & Kritsonis, 2007). Administrators often are concerned about inappropriate use of cell phones in schools and this is the major cause of restricting their use (Obringer & Coffey, 2007; St. Gerard, 2006). Cell phones ringing during a class time present unwanted distractions and, for some students, sending or receiving text messages can lead to cheating (Gilroy, 2003). The existing possibility of posting improper photos on the Internet is also a cause for concern (Obringer & Coffey, 2007). For these reasons, students are not allowed to visibly possess cell phones within most high school classrooms. The challenge faced by many administrators is to effectively balance the needs of the school with the demands of the students and the parents. Parents characteristically agree with school policy and want their children to abide by the rules (Obringer & Coffey, 2007). In contrast, regarding school emergencies or schedule changes, parents have often demanded immediate communication, which cell phones can provide (Johnson & Kritsonis, 2007; Obringer & Coffey, 2007). Parents report safety as the primary reason for supplying their children with cell phones, whereas children place a greater value on the technological capabilities of the cell phone and its potential to facilitate socialization (Johnson & Kritsonis, 2007; Obringer & Coffey, 2007). According to Prensky (2001a), students of today are referred to as “Digital Natives.” They have grown up with technology and multitasking, and they are in the habit of processing information quickly (Prensky, 2001a). Digital Natives want to be involved in active learning as opposed to sitting passively in class (Prensky, 2001a). They thrive on interactive technology, for example, tools like the cell phone (Prensky, 2001b; Prensky, 2005). Instructors may miss an educational opportunity if they do not incorporate cell phone use into their learning process (Prensky, 2005). Many teachers in a number of foreign countries already use cell phones as a learning tool (Librero, Ramos, Ranga, Trinona, & Lambert, 2007; Prensky, 2005). Often in remote areas connections to the Internet via cell phone are easier to access than connections via computer (Shinn, 2009). In these instances, cell phones are also less expensive to use (Shinn, 2009). T h e J o u rn a l o f Te c h n o lo g y S tu d ie s Student Reflective Perceptions of High School Educational Cell Phone Technology Usage M. Beth Humble-Thaden 10","PeriodicalId":142452,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Technology Studies","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Technology Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v37i1.a.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

High school students are prohibited from using cell phones during the school day within most public schools in the United States; the majority of students, however, maintain possession of a personal cell phone within the high school setting. Most administrators and teachers regard cell phone possession and usage as a negative distraction and deterrent to learning rather than as an educational learning tool. This study investigates college freshman students’ reflective perceptions of potential high school utilization of cell phones by students and teachers as educational learning tools. Positive response from surveys suggests there is interest in and potential for educational implementation and use of cell phones as learning tools in schools. Perceptional gender differences were uncovered suggesting further study is necessary before successful implementation can occur. School policy regarding cell phones, within the majority of public schools in the United States, is generally quite prohibitive and requires students to leave their cell phones at home or turn them off and leave them in their lockers during the school day (Obringer & Coffey, 2007). Other schools report changing policy from banning cell phone use to allowing students to use them before or after school (St. Gerard, 2006). As a result of the rapidly occurring technological advances within the cell phone industry, schools have been hard pressed to make and keep current educational policy regarding the use of cell phones (Obringer & Coffey, 2007). Students’ personal and social cell phone use has been well established, but how do high school students reflect on the usage of such phones in an educational setting? Determining student perception toward using the educational technological capabilities of cell phones within a learning environment is a first step. Knowledge of students’ attitudes could possibly lead to, aid in, and influence future decision making regarding the implementation of cell phone use for academic purposes within high school classrooms. Literature Review Administrators and teachers often regard the use of cell phones by students at school as a deterrent to student learning (Johnson & Kritsonis, 2007). Administrators often are concerned about inappropriate use of cell phones in schools and this is the major cause of restricting their use (Obringer & Coffey, 2007; St. Gerard, 2006). Cell phones ringing during a class time present unwanted distractions and, for some students, sending or receiving text messages can lead to cheating (Gilroy, 2003). The existing possibility of posting improper photos on the Internet is also a cause for concern (Obringer & Coffey, 2007). For these reasons, students are not allowed to visibly possess cell phones within most high school classrooms. The challenge faced by many administrators is to effectively balance the needs of the school with the demands of the students and the parents. Parents characteristically agree with school policy and want their children to abide by the rules (Obringer & Coffey, 2007). In contrast, regarding school emergencies or schedule changes, parents have often demanded immediate communication, which cell phones can provide (Johnson & Kritsonis, 2007; Obringer & Coffey, 2007). Parents report safety as the primary reason for supplying their children with cell phones, whereas children place a greater value on the technological capabilities of the cell phone and its potential to facilitate socialization (Johnson & Kritsonis, 2007; Obringer & Coffey, 2007). According to Prensky (2001a), students of today are referred to as “Digital Natives.” They have grown up with technology and multitasking, and they are in the habit of processing information quickly (Prensky, 2001a). Digital Natives want to be involved in active learning as opposed to sitting passively in class (Prensky, 2001a). They thrive on interactive technology, for example, tools like the cell phone (Prensky, 2001b; Prensky, 2005). Instructors may miss an educational opportunity if they do not incorporate cell phone use into their learning process (Prensky, 2005). Many teachers in a number of foreign countries already use cell phones as a learning tool (Librero, Ramos, Ranga, Trinona, & Lambert, 2007; Prensky, 2005). Often in remote areas connections to the Internet via cell phone are easier to access than connections via computer (Shinn, 2009). In these instances, cell phones are also less expensive to use (Shinn, 2009). T h e J o u rn a l o f Te c h n o lo g y S tu d ie s Student Reflective Perceptions of High School Educational Cell Phone Technology Usage M. Beth Humble-Thaden 10
学生对高中教育性手机技术使用的反思性认知
在美国大多数公立学校,高中生被禁止在上课时间使用手机;然而,大多数学生在高中环境中仍然拥有个人手机。大多数管理人员和教师认为手机的拥有和使用是一种消极的干扰和学习的威慑,而不是作为一种教育学习工具。本研究旨在调查大一新生对学生和教师在高中阶段使用手机作为教育学习工具的反思性认知。调查的积极反应表明,人们对教育实施和在学校使用手机作为学习工具有兴趣和潜力。发现了感知上的性别差异,表明在成功实施之前需要进一步研究。在美国大多数公立学校中,关于手机的学校政策通常是相当禁止的,要求学生在上学期间将手机留在家中或关闭手机并将其放在储物柜中(Obringer & Coffey, 2007)。其他学校报告说,他们改变了政策,从禁止使用手机到允许学生在放学前或放学后使用手机(St. Gerard, 2006)。由于手机行业内迅速发生的技术进步,学校一直在努力制定和保持当前关于手机使用的教育政策(Obringer & Coffey, 2007)。学生的个人和社交手机的使用已经很好地确立了,但是高中生如何反映在教育环境中使用这些手机?确定学生对在学习环境中使用手机的教育技术能力的看法是第一步。了解学生的态度可能会导致、帮助和影响未来在高中课堂上实施以学习为目的使用手机的决策。管理人员和教师通常认为学生在学校使用手机会阻碍学生的学习(Johnson & Kritsonis, 2007)。管理人员经常担心手机在学校的不当使用,这是限制手机使用的主要原因(Obringer & Coffey, 2007;圣杰勒德,2006)。上课时手机铃声会让人分心,对一些学生来说,收发短信会导致作弊(Gilroy, 2003)。在互联网上发布不当照片的可能性也是一个值得关注的问题(Obringer & Coffey, 2007)。由于这些原因,大多数高中教室不允许学生携带手机。许多管理人员面临的挑战是有效地平衡学校的需求与学生和家长的需求。家长通常同意学校的政策,并希望他们的孩子遵守规则(Obringer & Coffey, 2007)。相比之下,对于学校的紧急情况或时间表的变化,家长往往要求立即沟通,这可以提供手机(Johnson & Kritsonis, 2007;Obringer & Coffey, 2007)。父母报告说,安全是给孩子提供手机的主要原因,而孩子们更看重手机的技术能力及其促进社交的潜力(Johnson & Kritsonis, 2007;Obringer & Coffey, 2007)。根据Prensky (2001a)的说法,今天的学生被称为“数字原住民”。他们是在技术和多任务处理的环境中长大的,他们习惯于快速处理信息(Prensky, 2001a)。数字原住民希望参与主动学习,而不是被动地坐在课堂上(Prensky, 2001a)。他们在互动技术上茁壮成长,例如,像手机这样的工具(Prensky, 2001b;Prensky, 2005)。如果教师不将手机的使用纳入他们的学习过程,他们可能会错过一个教育机会(Prensky, 2005)。许多国外的教师已经使用手机作为学习工具(Librero, Ramos, Ranga, Trinona, & Lambert, 2007;Prensky, 2005)。通常在偏远地区,通过手机连接到互联网比通过计算机连接更容易访问(Shinn, 2009)。在这些情况下,手机也更便宜的使用(Shinn, 2009)。[10] [font =宋体][font =宋体][font =宋体][font =宋体][J]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信