A study of clinical and etiological profile of community-acquired pneumonia with special reference to atypical pneumonia

TC Nagesh Kumar, Roshna Rafiudeen, K. Rashmi
{"title":"A study of clinical and etiological profile of community-acquired pneumonia with special reference to atypical pneumonia","authors":"TC Nagesh Kumar, Roshna Rafiudeen, K. Rashmi","doi":"10.4103/anm.anm_26_16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pneumonia is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in developing countries. The cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is often difficult to establish. The most effective methods, especially for the diagnosis of atypical pathogens, are often invasive and may not always be justified. We studied the clinical and etiological profile of CAP, especially with regards to pathogens causing atypical pneumonia. Aims and Objectives: The aim is to study the clinical profile and etiological agents in patients suffering from CAP in our hospital and to detect proportion of atypical pathogens among these CAP patients. Methodology: From September 2012 to September 2014, 122 patients were diagnosed as having CAP and were included in this study. After sputum, blood culture, and serological evaluation, they were grouped as having typical and atypical pneumonia. Chi-square test was used as statistical method to compare between these two groups. Results: Of 122 patients, 40.2% of patients were found to have typical organisms and 20.5% had atypical organisms causing pneumonia. The common etiological agents were Streptococcus pneumoniae (15.6%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (8.2%) among typical pneumonia and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (7.4%) and Legionella pneumophila (5.7%) among atypical pneumonia cases. Conclusions: It is difficult to differentiate these causative agents by clinical features alone. Hence, appropriate serological, sputum, and blood culture should be carried out for early diagnosis, prompt treatment and also to reduce complications.","PeriodicalId":331118,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nigerian Medicine","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nigerian Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/anm.anm_26_16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Pneumonia is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in developing countries. The cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is often difficult to establish. The most effective methods, especially for the diagnosis of atypical pathogens, are often invasive and may not always be justified. We studied the clinical and etiological profile of CAP, especially with regards to pathogens causing atypical pneumonia. Aims and Objectives: The aim is to study the clinical profile and etiological agents in patients suffering from CAP in our hospital and to detect proportion of atypical pathogens among these CAP patients. Methodology: From September 2012 to September 2014, 122 patients were diagnosed as having CAP and were included in this study. After sputum, blood culture, and serological evaluation, they were grouped as having typical and atypical pneumonia. Chi-square test was used as statistical method to compare between these two groups. Results: Of 122 patients, 40.2% of patients were found to have typical organisms and 20.5% had atypical organisms causing pneumonia. The common etiological agents were Streptococcus pneumoniae (15.6%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (8.2%) among typical pneumonia and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (7.4%) and Legionella pneumophila (5.7%) among atypical pneumonia cases. Conclusions: It is difficult to differentiate these causative agents by clinical features alone. Hence, appropriate serological, sputum, and blood culture should be carried out for early diagnosis, prompt treatment and also to reduce complications.
社区获得性肺炎的临床和病因学分析,特别是非典型肺炎
背景:肺炎是发病和死亡的主要原因,特别是在发展中国家。社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的病因通常难以确定。最有效的方法,特别是对于非典型病原体的诊断,往往是侵入性的,可能并不总是合理的。我们研究了CAP的临床和病因学概况,特别是关于引起非典型肺炎的病原体。目的与目的:了解我院CAP患者的临床特点及病因,了解CAP患者中非典型病原体的比例。方法:2012年9月至2014年9月,122例确诊为CAP的患者纳入本研究。经痰液、血培养、血清学评价,分为典型肺炎和非典型肺炎。两组间比较采用卡方检验。结果:122例患者中检出典型病原菌占40.2%,非典型病原菌占20.5%。典型肺炎中常见病原为肺炎链球菌(15.6%)和肺炎克雷伯菌(8.2%),非典型肺炎中常见病原为肺炎支原体(7.4%)和嗜肺军团菌(5.7%)。结论:仅凭临床特征很难区分这些病原体。因此,应进行适当的血清学、痰液和血培养,以便早期诊断,及时治疗,并减少并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信