A Panoramic Review of the State Practice Section in the Asian Yearbook of International Law

Seryon Lee
{"title":"A Panoramic Review of the State Practice Section in the Asian Yearbook of International Law","authors":"Seryon Lee","doi":"10.1163/9789004501249_003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the State Practice section in the Asian Yearbook of International Law from Vol. 1 to Vol. 24 on the occasion of the 25th anniversary issue of the Asian Yearbook of International Law . For the past 24 volumes, state practice rapporteurs from 16 Asian countries 1 have reported various sources of state practice such as legislation, judicial decisions, government statements made at the United Nations and international conferences. As was evident from the voluminous record, the State Practice section from the past volumes covered topics ranging from state immunity, extradition, law of the sea, international human rights, relation ship between international law and domestic law, territorial disputes among others. This collection of state reports revealed continuous efforts from Asian countries to enact the necessary legislation to give domestic effect to inter national treaties to which they assumed an obligation. Such efforts to abide by international obligation were also reflected in a number of court cases by referring to relevant international instruments. One notable point about the state practice of Asian countries is that there were relatively few cases of inter national adjudication among Asian countries. It can be inferred from such a finding that governments of Asian countries have preferred diplomacy over legal adjudication as a way of dispute settlement when faced with a conflict or dispute with other countries. The collection of state report from Asian coun tries over the three decades have undoubtedly contributed to the development of international law as such evidence of state practice forms an essential part of customary international law. country. While distinction between international law and private international law become obscure years, this sought to confine the subject matter primarily related to public international In summary, the contents are summarized in chronological order, and some where are arranged by different of state","PeriodicalId":324506,"journal":{"name":"Asian Yearbook of International Law, Volume 25 (2019)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Yearbook of International Law, Volume 25 (2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004501249_003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the State Practice section in the Asian Yearbook of International Law from Vol. 1 to Vol. 24 on the occasion of the 25th anniversary issue of the Asian Yearbook of International Law . For the past 24 volumes, state practice rapporteurs from 16 Asian countries 1 have reported various sources of state practice such as legislation, judicial decisions, government statements made at the United Nations and international conferences. As was evident from the voluminous record, the State Practice section from the past volumes covered topics ranging from state immunity, extradition, law of the sea, international human rights, relation ship between international law and domestic law, territorial disputes among others. This collection of state reports revealed continuous efforts from Asian countries to enact the necessary legislation to give domestic effect to inter national treaties to which they assumed an obligation. Such efforts to abide by international obligation were also reflected in a number of court cases by referring to relevant international instruments. One notable point about the state practice of Asian countries is that there were relatively few cases of inter national adjudication among Asian countries. It can be inferred from such a finding that governments of Asian countries have preferred diplomacy over legal adjudication as a way of dispute settlement when faced with a conflict or dispute with other countries. The collection of state report from Asian coun tries over the three decades have undoubtedly contributed to the development of international law as such evidence of state practice forms an essential part of customary international law. country. While distinction between international law and private international law become obscure years, this sought to confine the subject matter primarily related to public international In summary, the contents are summarized in chronological order, and some where are arranged by different of state
《亚洲国际法年鉴》国家实践部分的全景式回顾
本文的目的是在《亚洲国际法年鉴》创刊25周年之际,对《亚洲国际法年鉴》第一卷至第二十四卷的国家实践部分进行概述。在过去的24卷中,来自16个亚洲国家的国家惯例报告员1报告了国家惯例的各种来源,如立法、司法决定、政府在联合国和国际会议上的发言。从大量记录中可以明显看出,过去各卷的国家惯例部分涵盖的主题包括国家豁免、引渡、海洋法、国际人权、国际法与国内法之间的关系、领土争端等。这些国家报告表明,亚洲国家不断努力制定必要的立法,使它们承担义务的国际条约在国内生效。这种遵守国际义务的努力也反映在一些法院案件中,它们援引有关的国际文书。亚洲国家的国家实践中值得注意的一点是,亚洲国家间国际裁判的案例相对较少。从这一发现可以推断,亚洲国家的政府在面对与其他国家的冲突或争端时,更倾向于外交而不是法律裁决作为解决争端的方式。三十年来收集亚洲国家的报告无疑对国际法的发展作出了贡献,因为这些国家实践的证据构成了习惯国际法的重要组成部分。的国家。虽然国际法与国际私法之间的区别已变得模糊不清,但这试图将主要与国际公法有关的主题限制在一起。总之,内容按时间顺序总结,有些地方是由不同的国家安排的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信