A suggested design for a tissue level dental implant

F. Alhamdani, Basma A. Al-Ghali
{"title":"A suggested design for a tissue level dental implant","authors":"F. Alhamdani, Basma A. Al-Ghali","doi":"10.25259/AJOHAS_5_2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe aim of the study was to test the stress distribution around a newly suggested design for tissue-level dental implant.\n\n\n\nNewly designed modified reverse buttress thread dental implant is tested for the stress over the surrounding bone. Nine implant dimensions of this design were examined on two types of materials; commercially pure Titanium (TiG4) and Titanium alloy (TIG5). These nine implant dimensions, which can be used in the full dental arch are: (diameter/length; 3.5/11, 4/11, 4/9, 4.5/11, 4.5/9, 5/11, 5/9, 5/7, and 5.5/7 mm). The suggested implant was designed using Autodesk Inventor 202. ANSYS Workbench 2020 R2 was used for meshing and 3D finite element analysis.\n\n\n\nMaximum Von Mises stress over the cortical bone is higher in the TiG5 model in all implant dimensions. The highest stress value was reported in the implant 4/9 mm dimension in both models. TiG5 model has the highest stress values over the cancellous bone. The higher level of stress over the surrounding cortical bone lies at the surface of the cortical bone, whereas the maximum stress over the surrounding trabecular bone was noticed near the tip of the first and second dental implant thread.\n\n\n\nReasonable levels of stress were reported in the suggested design in both models. However, it would be justifiable to choose the TiG4 model for the suggested tissue level implant with the exclusion of a 4/9 mm dimension to ensure minimal stress over the surrounding cortical bone.\n","PeriodicalId":408631,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Oral Health and Allied Sciences","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Oral Health and Allied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/AJOHAS_5_2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to test the stress distribution around a newly suggested design for tissue-level dental implant. Newly designed modified reverse buttress thread dental implant is tested for the stress over the surrounding bone. Nine implant dimensions of this design were examined on two types of materials; commercially pure Titanium (TiG4) and Titanium alloy (TIG5). These nine implant dimensions, which can be used in the full dental arch are: (diameter/length; 3.5/11, 4/11, 4/9, 4.5/11, 4.5/9, 5/11, 5/9, 5/7, and 5.5/7 mm). The suggested implant was designed using Autodesk Inventor 202. ANSYS Workbench 2020 R2 was used for meshing and 3D finite element analysis. Maximum Von Mises stress over the cortical bone is higher in the TiG5 model in all implant dimensions. The highest stress value was reported in the implant 4/9 mm dimension in both models. TiG5 model has the highest stress values over the cancellous bone. The higher level of stress over the surrounding cortical bone lies at the surface of the cortical bone, whereas the maximum stress over the surrounding trabecular bone was noticed near the tip of the first and second dental implant thread. Reasonable levels of stress were reported in the suggested design in both models. However, it would be justifiable to choose the TiG4 model for the suggested tissue level implant with the exclusion of a 4/9 mm dimension to ensure minimal stress over the surrounding cortical bone.
组织级牙种植体的建议设计
本研究的目的是测试一种新提出的组织级牙种植体设计的应力分布。新设计的改良的反向支撑螺纹牙种植体对周围骨的应力进行了测试。在两种类型的材料上检查了该设计的九个植入物尺寸;纯钛(TiG4)和钛合金(TIG5)。这九种种植体尺寸,可用于全牙弓:(直径/长度;3.5/11, 4/11, 4/9, 4.5/11, 4.5/9, 5/11, 5/9, 5/7, 5.5/7毫米)。所建议的植入物是使用Autodesk Inventor 202设计的。采用ANSYS Workbench 2020 R2进行网格划分和三维有限元分析。在所有种植体尺寸中,TiG5模型中皮质骨上的最大Von Mises应力都更高。据报道,两种模型中种植体4/9 mm尺寸的应力值最高。TiG5模型在松质骨上的应力值最高。周围皮质骨的应力水平较高,位于皮质骨的表面,而周围小梁骨的最大应力出现在第一和第二种植牙线的尖端附近。两种模型的建议设计中均报告了合理的应力水平。然而,选择TiG4模型作为推荐的组织水平种植体是合理的,排除了4/9毫米的尺寸,以确保对周围皮质骨的应力最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信