Identification and Prioritization of Barriers to Total Quality Management Implementation in Service Industry: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach

Faisal Talib, Z. Rahman
{"title":"Identification and Prioritization of Barriers to Total Quality Management Implementation in Service Industry: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach","authors":"Faisal Talib, Z. Rahman","doi":"10.1108/TQM-11-2013-0122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – Despite the potential benefits of total quality management (TQM) articulated by quality experts and practitioners, these benefits are not easy to achieve in practice. Many service industries have found difficult to implement TQM successfully. The present study investigates and categorizes the barriers to a successful implementation of TQM program in the service industry. The purpose of this paper is to understand TQM barriers and prioritize their relative importance by ranking them in the service industry.Design/methodology/approach – Based on previously published literature on TQM barriers in service industry and after discussions with quality experts, this study utilizes a set of 12 barriers to TQM as identified by the authors of TQM barriers to accomplish the objectives of the present study. The 12 barriers were divided into three categories. These barriers were prioritized and ranked using an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach, a multi-criteria decision-making process.Findings – In this research, the category “managerial issues” was found to be the most important, followed by “people-oriented issues” and “organizational issues” based on their priority weights. The results have also highlighted that the barrier “lack of communication” was the most significant among all the other barriers. It was followed by “lack of top-management commitment,” “employee’s resistance to change,” and “lack of coordination between departments.” The least significant barrier was “high turnover at management level.”Practical implications – The study ranks the barriers, from the most important to the least important, which will allow managers and practitioners in the service industry to decide which barriers they need to pay attention to and work on for a successful implementation of TQM.Originality/value – The strength of this study is the development of a comprehensive model for the investigation and prioritization of barriers that the service industry experiences when implementing a TQM program. Presenting TQM barriers in the form of AHP-based model and categorizing barriers is a new effort in the area of TQM.","PeriodicalId":431765,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management eJournal","volume":"421 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Management eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-11-2013-0122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

Purpose – Despite the potential benefits of total quality management (TQM) articulated by quality experts and practitioners, these benefits are not easy to achieve in practice. Many service industries have found difficult to implement TQM successfully. The present study investigates and categorizes the barriers to a successful implementation of TQM program in the service industry. The purpose of this paper is to understand TQM barriers and prioritize their relative importance by ranking them in the service industry.Design/methodology/approach – Based on previously published literature on TQM barriers in service industry and after discussions with quality experts, this study utilizes a set of 12 barriers to TQM as identified by the authors of TQM barriers to accomplish the objectives of the present study. The 12 barriers were divided into three categories. These barriers were prioritized and ranked using an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach, a multi-criteria decision-making process.Findings – In this research, the category “managerial issues” was found to be the most important, followed by “people-oriented issues” and “organizational issues” based on their priority weights. The results have also highlighted that the barrier “lack of communication” was the most significant among all the other barriers. It was followed by “lack of top-management commitment,” “employee’s resistance to change,” and “lack of coordination between departments.” The least significant barrier was “high turnover at management level.”Practical implications – The study ranks the barriers, from the most important to the least important, which will allow managers and practitioners in the service industry to decide which barriers they need to pay attention to and work on for a successful implementation of TQM.Originality/value – The strength of this study is the development of a comprehensive model for the investigation and prioritization of barriers that the service industry experiences when implementing a TQM program. Presenting TQM barriers in the form of AHP-based model and categorizing barriers is a new effort in the area of TQM.
服务业实施全面质量管理的障碍识别与优先排序:层次分析法
目的——尽管质量专家和从业者阐述了全面质量管理(TQM)的潜在好处,但这些好处在实践中并不容易实现。许多服务行业发现实施全面质量管理很难成功。本研究对服务行业成功实施全面质量管理计划的障碍进行了调查和分类。本文的目的是了解TQM障碍,并通过在服务行业中对它们进行排名来优先考虑它们的相对重要性。设计/方法论/方法-基于先前发表的关于服务业TQM障碍的文献,并在与质量专家讨论后,本研究利用TQM障碍作者确定的12个TQM障碍来完成本研究的目标。这12个障碍被分为三类。使用层次分析法(AHP)对这些障碍进行了优先级排序和排名,这是一种多标准决策过程。在本研究中,“管理问题”类别被发现是最重要的,其次是“以人为本的问题”和“组织问题”。调查结果还强调,在所有障碍中,“缺乏沟通”是最重要的障碍。紧随其后的是“缺乏高层管理的承诺”、“员工对变革的抵制”和“部门之间缺乏协调”。最不重要的障碍是“管理层的高流动率”。实际意义-该研究对障碍进行了排名,从最重要的到最不重要的,这将使服务行业的管理人员和从业者决定他们需要注意哪些障碍,并为成功实施TQM而努力。原创性/价值-本研究的优势在于开发了一个全面的模型,用于调查和优先考虑服务行业在实施TQM计划时遇到的障碍。以基于层次分析法的模型的形式呈现TQM障碍,并对障碍进行分类是TQM研究领域的一项新成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信