Does the Job Matter? Diversity Officers and Racialized Stress

A. H. Wingfield, Elizabeth Hordge-Freeman, L. Smith-Lovin
{"title":"Does the Job Matter? Diversity Officers and Racialized Stress","authors":"A. H. Wingfield, Elizabeth Hordge-Freeman, L. Smith-Lovin","doi":"10.1108/S0277-283320180000032013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nResearch indicates that work in predominantly white professional settings generates stress for minority professionals. However, certain occupations may enable or constrain these race-related stressors. In this paper, we use affect control theory to examine the identity dynamics present in professions that explicitly require workers to highlight racial issues. We might expect that occupations that require attention to racial inequalities could produce heightened stress for these workers. However, our research on diversity officers indicates that the opportunity to advocate for disadvantaged groups and address racial bias explicitly creates emotions of satisfaction and fulfillment, and removes some of the common pressures to manage negative emotions that arise as a result of cross-race interactions. Importantly, these emotions are achieved when minority diversity workers perceive institutional supports that buttress their work. Thus, our findings offer a more nuanced assessment of the ways professionals of color engage in various types of emotional performance, and emphasize the importance of both occupational role and institutional support.","PeriodicalId":422408,"journal":{"name":"Race, Identity and Work","volume":"41 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Race, Identity and Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0277-283320180000032013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Research indicates that work in predominantly white professional settings generates stress for minority professionals. However, certain occupations may enable or constrain these race-related stressors. In this paper, we use affect control theory to examine the identity dynamics present in professions that explicitly require workers to highlight racial issues. We might expect that occupations that require attention to racial inequalities could produce heightened stress for these workers. However, our research on diversity officers indicates that the opportunity to advocate for disadvantaged groups and address racial bias explicitly creates emotions of satisfaction and fulfillment, and removes some of the common pressures to manage negative emotions that arise as a result of cross-race interactions. Importantly, these emotions are achieved when minority diversity workers perceive institutional supports that buttress their work. Thus, our findings offer a more nuanced assessment of the ways professionals of color engage in various types of emotional performance, and emphasize the importance of both occupational role and institutional support.
工作重要吗?多元化官员和种族化压力
研究表明,在以白人为主的专业环境中工作,会给少数族裔专业人士带来压力。然而,某些职业可能会激发或抑制这些与种族有关的压力源。在本文中,我们使用影响控制理论来研究明确要求工人强调种族问题的职业中存在的身份动态。我们可能会认为,需要关注种族不平等的职业可能会给这些工人带来更大的压力。然而,我们对多元化官员的研究表明,为弱势群体辩护和解决种族偏见的机会明确创造了满足感和满足感,并消除了由于跨种族互动而产生的一些常见的管理负面情绪的压力。重要的是,当少数族裔多元化工作者感受到支持他们工作的制度支持时,就会产生这些情绪。因此,我们的研究结果为有色人种专业人士参与各种情感表现的方式提供了更细致的评估,并强调了职业角色和制度支持的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信