Flexible multichannel blind deconvolution, an investigation

A. Tsoi, Liangsuo Ma
{"title":"Flexible multichannel blind deconvolution, an investigation","authors":"A. Tsoi, Liangsuo Ma","doi":"10.1109/NNSP.2003.1318034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we consider the issue of devising a flexible nonlinear function for multichannel blind deconvolution. In particular, we consider the underlying assumption of the source probability density functions. We consider two cases, when the source probability density functions are assumed to be uni-modal, and multimodal respectively. In the unimodal case, there are two approaches: Pearson function and generalized exponential function. In the multimodal case, there are three approaches: mixture of Gaussian functions, mixture of Pearson functions, and mixture of generalized exponential functions. It is demonstrated through an illustrating example that the assumption on the source probability density functions gives rise to different performances of source separation algorithms for the multichannel blind deconvolution problem. Further it is observed that these performance differences are not large, indicating that the current formulation of multichannel blind deconvolution problems is robust with respect to the underlying assumption of source probability density functions. It is further speculated that one of the discriminating features among various source separation algorithms appears to be the relative computational efficiencies of various approximation schemes. In other words, the discriminating feature of various source separation algorithms based on assumptions on the source probability density function appears to be an implementation issue rather than one of a theoretical concern.","PeriodicalId":315958,"journal":{"name":"2003 IEEE XIII Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing (IEEE Cat. No.03TH8718)","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2003 IEEE XIII Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing (IEEE Cat. No.03TH8718)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NNSP.2003.1318034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the issue of devising a flexible nonlinear function for multichannel blind deconvolution. In particular, we consider the underlying assumption of the source probability density functions. We consider two cases, when the source probability density functions are assumed to be uni-modal, and multimodal respectively. In the unimodal case, there are two approaches: Pearson function and generalized exponential function. In the multimodal case, there are three approaches: mixture of Gaussian functions, mixture of Pearson functions, and mixture of generalized exponential functions. It is demonstrated through an illustrating example that the assumption on the source probability density functions gives rise to different performances of source separation algorithms for the multichannel blind deconvolution problem. Further it is observed that these performance differences are not large, indicating that the current formulation of multichannel blind deconvolution problems is robust with respect to the underlying assumption of source probability density functions. It is further speculated that one of the discriminating features among various source separation algorithms appears to be the relative computational efficiencies of various approximation schemes. In other words, the discriminating feature of various source separation algorithms based on assumptions on the source probability density function appears to be an implementation issue rather than one of a theoretical concern.
柔性多通道盲反褶积的研究
在本文中,我们考虑了设计一个柔性非线性函数用于多通道盲反卷积的问题。特别地,我们考虑了源概率密度函数的基本假设。我们考虑了两种情况,分别假设源概率密度函数为单峰和多峰。在单峰情况下,有两种方法:皮尔逊函数和广义指数函数。在多模态情况下,有三种方法:高斯函数的混合、皮尔逊函数的混合和广义指数函数的混合。通过实例说明,对信源概率密度函数的假设导致了多通道盲反卷积问题中信源分离算法的不同性能。进一步观察到,这些性能差异并不大,表明目前的多通道盲反卷积问题的公式相对于源概率密度函数的基本假设是鲁棒的。进一步推测,各种源分离算法之间的区别特征之一似乎是各种近似方案的相对计算效率。换句话说,基于源概率密度函数假设的各种源分离算法的判别特征似乎是一个实现问题,而不是一个理论问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信