Factors influencing amphibian distributions in Grand Teton National Park and western Wyoming

Zachary P. Wallace, Lusha M. Tronstad
{"title":"Factors influencing amphibian distributions in Grand Teton National Park and western Wyoming","authors":"Zachary P. Wallace, Lusha M. Tronstad","doi":"10.13001/uwnpsrc.2018.5663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Predicting the distribution of amphibians can be difficult because habitat suitability may depend on a variety of environmental and anthropogenic factors, including water quality of wetlands, geology of watersheds, and presence of invasive pathogens. Previous studies hypothesized that water chemistry may influence the rate of chytrid infection in amphibians where higher conductivity sites may have less infection. We sampled two watersheds in Grand Teton National Park and 3 watersheds adjacent to the park, and measured amphibian presence, chytrid infection, basic water quality, major ion concentrations and geology of the wetland. This is part of a larger project where we are comparing amphibian presence and infection rate among wetlands in the Gros Ventre, Wind River, and Teton Ranges. We sampled watersheds that were predominately limestone, granite or a mixture. Water quality varied among sites with higher conductivity and ion concentrations for limestone watersheds compared to granite watersheds. This report includes preliminary results of amphibian surveys and water quality analyses. Future analyses will relate occupancy rates of amphibians to environmental factors, including water chemistry, geology, and presence of chytrid fungus, as well as comparing detection rates of amphibians with environmental DNA (eDNA) and visual observation surveys. \n  \n Featured photo by Neal Herbert on Flickr. https://flic.kr/p/2gv9PJA","PeriodicalId":217302,"journal":{"name":"The UW National Parks Service Research Station Annual Reports","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The UW National Parks Service Research Station Annual Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13001/uwnpsrc.2018.5663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predicting the distribution of amphibians can be difficult because habitat suitability may depend on a variety of environmental and anthropogenic factors, including water quality of wetlands, geology of watersheds, and presence of invasive pathogens. Previous studies hypothesized that water chemistry may influence the rate of chytrid infection in amphibians where higher conductivity sites may have less infection. We sampled two watersheds in Grand Teton National Park and 3 watersheds adjacent to the park, and measured amphibian presence, chytrid infection, basic water quality, major ion concentrations and geology of the wetland. This is part of a larger project where we are comparing amphibian presence and infection rate among wetlands in the Gros Ventre, Wind River, and Teton Ranges. We sampled watersheds that were predominately limestone, granite or a mixture. Water quality varied among sites with higher conductivity and ion concentrations for limestone watersheds compared to granite watersheds. This report includes preliminary results of amphibian surveys and water quality analyses. Future analyses will relate occupancy rates of amphibians to environmental factors, including water chemistry, geology, and presence of chytrid fungus, as well as comparing detection rates of amphibians with environmental DNA (eDNA) and visual observation surveys.    Featured photo by Neal Herbert on Flickr. https://flic.kr/p/2gv9PJA
影响大提顿国家公园和怀俄明州西部两栖动物分布的因素
预测两栖动物的分布可能是困难的,因为栖息地的适宜性可能取决于各种环境和人为因素,包括湿地的水质、流域的地质和入侵病原体的存在。先前的研究假设水化学可能影响两栖动物中壶菌的感染率,因为较高的电导率可能较少感染。我们对大提顿国家公园内的两个流域和公园附近的三个流域进行了采样,测量了两栖动物的存在、壶菌感染、基本水质、主要离子浓度和湿地的地质情况。这是一个更大项目的一部分,我们正在比较格罗斯文特尔、风河和提顿山脉湿地中两栖动物的存在和感染率。我们对主要由石灰岩、花岗岩或混合物组成的流域取样。与花岗岩流域相比,石灰石流域的水质在电导率和离子浓度较高的地点之间存在差异。本报告包括两栖动物调查和水质分析的初步结果。未来的分析将把两栖动物的占用率与环境因素联系起来,包括水化学、地质和壶菌的存在,并将两栖动物的检出率与环境DNA (eDNA)和目视观察调查进行比较。尼尔·赫伯特在Flickr上提供的特色照片。https://flic.kr/p/2gv9PJA
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信