{"title":"Globalization and Income Inequality in Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria, and Turkey: A Dynamic GMM Approach","authors":"T. Osinubi, P. A. Olomola","doi":"10.20448/journal.501.2020.71.91.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the effect of globalisation on income inequality in Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria, and Turkey between 1980 and 2018, using economic, social, political, and overall globalisation as proposed by Dreher., Gaston, and Martens (2008). The study employs a dynamic Generalised Method of Moments. Results show that economic globalisation significantly increases income inequality in Mexico and Turkey, but insignificantly reduces inequality in Indonesia and Nigeria. For social globalisation, inequality responds positively to it in all the MINT countries, except in Turkey. Political globalisation adds to income inequality in Mexico, but reduces inequality in Nigeria and Turkey. In Indonesia, political globalisation exerts insignificant positive effect on inequality. Overall globalisation increases income inequality in all the MINT countries, except in Indonesia. The study, therefore, concludes that the various dimensions of globalisation and overall globalisation are key drivers of income inequality in each of the MINT countries, except in some few cases.","PeriodicalId":360581,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research","volume":"590 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.501.2020.71.91.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
This study examines the effect of globalisation on income inequality in Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria, and Turkey between 1980 and 2018, using economic, social, political, and overall globalisation as proposed by Dreher., Gaston, and Martens (2008). The study employs a dynamic Generalised Method of Moments. Results show that economic globalisation significantly increases income inequality in Mexico and Turkey, but insignificantly reduces inequality in Indonesia and Nigeria. For social globalisation, inequality responds positively to it in all the MINT countries, except in Turkey. Political globalisation adds to income inequality in Mexico, but reduces inequality in Nigeria and Turkey. In Indonesia, political globalisation exerts insignificant positive effect on inequality. Overall globalisation increases income inequality in all the MINT countries, except in Indonesia. The study, therefore, concludes that the various dimensions of globalisation and overall globalisation are key drivers of income inequality in each of the MINT countries, except in some few cases.
本研究利用德雷尔提出的经济、社会、政治和整体全球化,考察了1980年至2018年间全球化对墨西哥、印度尼西亚、尼日利亚和土耳其收入不平等的影响。, Gaston, and Martens(2008)。该研究采用了一种动态广义矩量法。结果表明,经济全球化显著增加了墨西哥和土耳其的收入不平等,但不显著减少了印度尼西亚和尼日利亚的收入不平等。就社会全球化而言,除土耳其外,所有MINT国家的不平等都对其做出了积极反应。政治全球化加剧了墨西哥的收入不平等,但减少了尼日利亚和土耳其的不平等。在印尼,政治全球化对不平等的积极影响并不显著。总体而言,全球化加剧了所有MINT国家(印尼除外)的收入不平等。因此,这项研究得出的结论是,全球化的各个方面和整体全球化是每个MINT国家收入不平等的关键驱动因素,除了少数几个国家。