What do exam results really measure?

K. Crawford, A. Fekete
{"title":"What do exam results really measure?","authors":"K. Crawford, A. Fekete","doi":"10.1145/299359.299386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students are evaluated using examinations, but how do we evaluate whether the examination is correctly measuring the students’ knowledge or skill? This paper presents a methodology which we have used in an experiment: students’ exam results were analysed to reveal which different cognitive skills were used in answering different questions. The analysis revealed that students were approaching several questions in ways that the instructor had not anticipated. Sometimes questions the instructor considered straightforward actually tested students’ conceptual understanding; on other questions which were intended to require problem-solving, many students never identified the concepts involved, so that grades measured primarily the ability to avoid distraction. In other cases, we demonstrated that questions did assess deep understanding of the fundamental concepts, rather than rote-learning or simple patternmatching.","PeriodicalId":435916,"journal":{"name":"African Conference on Software Engineering","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Conference on Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/299359.299386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Students are evaluated using examinations, but how do we evaluate whether the examination is correctly measuring the students’ knowledge or skill? This paper presents a methodology which we have used in an experiment: students’ exam results were analysed to reveal which different cognitive skills were used in answering different questions. The analysis revealed that students were approaching several questions in ways that the instructor had not anticipated. Sometimes questions the instructor considered straightforward actually tested students’ conceptual understanding; on other questions which were intended to require problem-solving, many students never identified the concepts involved, so that grades measured primarily the ability to avoid distraction. In other cases, we demonstrated that questions did assess deep understanding of the fundamental concepts, rather than rote-learning or simple patternmatching.
考试成绩真正衡量的是什么?
通过考试来评估学生,但我们如何评估考试是否正确地衡量了学生的知识或技能?本文介绍了我们在实验中使用的一种方法:分析学生的考试成绩,以揭示在回答不同的问题时使用了哪些不同的认知技能。分析显示,学生们回答问题的方式是老师没有预料到的。有时老师认为简单的问题实际上测试的是学生的概念理解;在其他要求学生解决问题的问题上,许多学生根本不知道所涉及的概念,所以分数主要衡量的是避免分心的能力。在其他情况下,我们证明了问题确实评估了对基本概念的深刻理解,而不是死记硬背或简单的模式匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信