F. Foppolo, Greta Mazzaggio, Ludovico Franco, M. R. Manzini
{"title":"A group of researchers are testing pseudopartitives in Italian: Notional number is not the key to the facts","authors":"F. Foppolo, Greta Mazzaggio, Ludovico Franco, M. R. Manzini","doi":"10.5070/g6011145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper focuses on pseudopartitive constructions headed by quantifier, collective, or container nouns (like a lot of senators, a group of students, a bottle of pills) followed by a singular or a plural verb. We compared these structures with superficially similar adnominal structures of the form NP1[−PL] prep NP2[PL] (e.g., the level of the lakes is/are) in Italian in an acceptability judgment study (Experiment 1), a forced-choice task (Experiment 2), and an eye tracking reading study (Experiment 3). Two major findings were consistent across all studies. First, verb agreement in pseudopartitives always patterned differently from controls. Second, albeit an overall preference for singular verbs was observed, a gradient difference emerged between adnominal controls and pseudopartitives, and among pseudopartitives headed by different nouns. We explain such variability in terms of the availability of a measure interpretation (e.g., pills in the measure of a bottle vs. a bottle containing pills) which is linked to the type of the pseudopartitive’s head noun. While in non-pseudopartitive adnominal structures only one parse is allowed by the grammar, in pseudopartitives a given head noun may admit or block a structural configuration in which the plural feature of the embedded constituent (e.g., of students, modifying a group) can determine the plurality of the subsequent verb. We conclude that verb agreement in pseudopartitives is a grammatical phenomenon and, as such, it refers to speakers’ grammatical competence and cannot be reduced to agreement attraction of the plural intervener.","PeriodicalId":164622,"journal":{"name":"Glossa Psycholinguistics","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glossa Psycholinguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/g6011145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present paper focuses on pseudopartitive constructions headed by quantifier, collective, or container nouns (like a lot of senators, a group of students, a bottle of pills) followed by a singular or a plural verb. We compared these structures with superficially similar adnominal structures of the form NP1[−PL] prep NP2[PL] (e.g., the level of the lakes is/are) in Italian in an acceptability judgment study (Experiment 1), a forced-choice task (Experiment 2), and an eye tracking reading study (Experiment 3). Two major findings were consistent across all studies. First, verb agreement in pseudopartitives always patterned differently from controls. Second, albeit an overall preference for singular verbs was observed, a gradient difference emerged between adnominal controls and pseudopartitives, and among pseudopartitives headed by different nouns. We explain such variability in terms of the availability of a measure interpretation (e.g., pills in the measure of a bottle vs. a bottle containing pills) which is linked to the type of the pseudopartitive’s head noun. While in non-pseudopartitive adnominal structures only one parse is allowed by the grammar, in pseudopartitives a given head noun may admit or block a structural configuration in which the plural feature of the embedded constituent (e.g., of students, modifying a group) can determine the plurality of the subsequent verb. We conclude that verb agreement in pseudopartitives is a grammatical phenomenon and, as such, it refers to speakers’ grammatical competence and cannot be reduced to agreement attraction of the plural intervener.
本文主要研究以量词、集体名词或容器名词(如lot of senators、a group of students、a bottle of pills)为首的假配词结构,后面接动词的单数或复数。在可接受性判断研究(实验1)、强迫选择任务(实验2)和眼动追踪阅读研究(实验3)中,我们将这些结构与意大利语中表面相似的形式NP1[−PL] prep NP2[PL](例如,湖泊的水平是/是)的修饰结构进行了比较。所有研究的两个主要发现都是一致的。首先,伪选词中的动词一致性模式总是与控制不同。其次,尽管总体上人们对单数动词的偏好被观察到,但在副词控制和假配词之间以及以不同名词为首的假配词之间出现了梯度差异。我们根据测量解释的可用性来解释这种可变性(例如,瓶子中的药片与含有药片的瓶子中的药片),这与假配的头名词的类型有关。而在非假配副词结构中,语法只允许一种解析,在假配动词中,给定的头名词可以承认或阻止一种结构构型,在这种构型中,嵌入成分的复数特征(例如,学生,修饰一个群体)可以决定后面动词的复数。我们得出结论,假配词中的动词一致是一种语法现象,因此,它指的是说话人的语法能力,而不能简化为复数介入语的一致吸引。