What draws voters to brandidates and why? – political orientation, personal satisfaction, and societal values on presidential candidates’ brand personality

K. Harrison, B. Yoo, Shawn T Thelen, John Ford
{"title":"What draws voters to brandidates and why? – political orientation, personal satisfaction, and societal values on presidential candidates’ brand personality","authors":"K. Harrison, B. Yoo, Shawn T Thelen, John Ford","doi":"10.1108/jpbm-08-2021-3606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to determine the impact of voters’ personal and societal values on presidential candidate brand personality preference. In addition, the research examines which brand personalities are deemed most and least important. This research meets the growing demand to further understand how voters develop preferences for brandidates.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nVoters ranked which presidential brand personalities they deemed most important in a candidate as well as which of the two major candidates they most associated with that trait. Data were collected weeks in advance of the 2020 presidential election from a national online panel representing a balanced mix of voters by party affiliation.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results indicate that life satisfaction, political orientation and postmaterialism are significant and provide adequate explanatory power in understanding which brand personality traits are associated with a presidential candidate. Also, using an importance-performance matrix, the authors find which candidate is most identified with various brand personality traits and how important those traits are to voters.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nUsing the importance-performance matrix for assessing brand/candidate personality preference by consumers/voters provides researchers with a multidimensional method for analyzing how various dimensions influence selection preference. The explanatory power of the independent variables, i.e. political orientation, comparative life satisfaction and societal values, is very low when regressed against personality attributes in general (not assigned to a candidate); however, they provide meaningful results when regressed against personality attributes when assigned to candidates. Understanding the importance of general brand personality attributes is not as important as understanding their importance when associated with a specific brand.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe importance-performance matrix for brand/candidate personality presented in this research clearly indicated and predicted voter preference for the 2020 Presidential election; thus, this tool can be effectively used by political marketers in future elections. Political orientation so strongly influences voter perception of specific candidate brand personality dimensions that they view their preferred candidate to be universally superior to other candidates. Political marketers can appeal to voters based on their political orientation to strengthen the relationship between candidates and voters.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research investigates how personal and societal values impact voters’ preference for brand personality traits in a presidential candidate. Voter preference for presidential brand personality traits is assessed generically, i.e. not associated with a particular candidate, as well as when they are linked to a specific candidate, i.e. Biden and Trump.\n","PeriodicalId":114857,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Product & Brand Management","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Product & Brand Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-08-2021-3606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of voters’ personal and societal values on presidential candidate brand personality preference. In addition, the research examines which brand personalities are deemed most and least important. This research meets the growing demand to further understand how voters develop preferences for brandidates. Design/methodology/approach Voters ranked which presidential brand personalities they deemed most important in a candidate as well as which of the two major candidates they most associated with that trait. Data were collected weeks in advance of the 2020 presidential election from a national online panel representing a balanced mix of voters by party affiliation. Findings The results indicate that life satisfaction, political orientation and postmaterialism are significant and provide adequate explanatory power in understanding which brand personality traits are associated with a presidential candidate. Also, using an importance-performance matrix, the authors find which candidate is most identified with various brand personality traits and how important those traits are to voters. Research limitations/implications Using the importance-performance matrix for assessing brand/candidate personality preference by consumers/voters provides researchers with a multidimensional method for analyzing how various dimensions influence selection preference. The explanatory power of the independent variables, i.e. political orientation, comparative life satisfaction and societal values, is very low when regressed against personality attributes in general (not assigned to a candidate); however, they provide meaningful results when regressed against personality attributes when assigned to candidates. Understanding the importance of general brand personality attributes is not as important as understanding their importance when associated with a specific brand. Practical implications The importance-performance matrix for brand/candidate personality presented in this research clearly indicated and predicted voter preference for the 2020 Presidential election; thus, this tool can be effectively used by political marketers in future elections. Political orientation so strongly influences voter perception of specific candidate brand personality dimensions that they view their preferred candidate to be universally superior to other candidates. Political marketers can appeal to voters based on their political orientation to strengthen the relationship between candidates and voters. Originality/value This research investigates how personal and societal values impact voters’ preference for brand personality traits in a presidential candidate. Voter preference for presidential brand personality traits is assessed generically, i.e. not associated with a particular candidate, as well as when they are linked to a specific candidate, i.e. Biden and Trump.
是什么吸引选民支持候选人?为什么?——政治取向、个人满意度和社会价值观对总统候选人品牌个性的影响
目的本研究旨在探讨选民的个人价值观与社会价值观对总统候选人品牌人格偏好的影响。此外,该研究还调查了哪些品牌个性被认为最重要和最不重要。这项研究满足了进一步了解选民如何对候选人产生偏好的日益增长的需求。设计/方法/方法选民对他们认为在候选人身上最重要的总统品牌个性进行排名,以及他们认为两位主要候选人中哪一位与这一特征最相关。数据是在2020年总统大选前几周从一个全国在线小组收集的,该小组代表了按党派划分的选民平衡组合。研究结果表明,生活满意度、政治取向和后唯物主义对总统候选人的品牌人格特征有显著影响,为理解品牌人格特征与总统候选人的关系提供了充分的解释力。此外,使用重要性-绩效矩阵,作者发现哪位候选人最具各种品牌个性特征,以及这些特征对选民的重要性。使用重要性-绩效矩阵来评估消费者/选民的品牌/候选人个性偏好,为研究人员提供了一种多维度的方法来分析不同维度如何影响选择偏好。自变量,即政治取向,比较生活满意度和社会价值观,在对一般人格属性(未分配给候选人)进行回归时,解释力非常低;然而,当将它们与分配给候选人的个性属性进行回归时,它们提供了有意义的结果。了解一般品牌个性属性的重要性不如了解与特定品牌相关的品牌个性属性的重要性。本研究提出的品牌/候选人个性重要性-绩效矩阵清晰地显示和预测了选民对2020年总统选举的偏好;因此,政治营销人员可以在未来的选举中有效地利用这一工具。政治倾向如此强烈地影响选民对特定候选人品牌个性维度的看法,以至于他们认为自己喜欢的候选人普遍优于其他候选人。政治营销人员可以根据选民的政治倾向来吸引选民,从而加强候选人与选民之间的关系。原创性/价值本研究调查了个人价值观和社会价值观如何影响选民对总统候选人品牌个性特征的偏好。选民对总统品牌人格特征的偏好是一般评估的,即与特定候选人无关,以及与特定候选人(即拜登和特朗普)相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信