Is a Dominant Service-Centric Sector Good for Diversity of Provision?

J. Hutchinson, P. Sawyer, J. Walkerdine
{"title":"Is a Dominant Service-Centric Sector Good for Diversity of Provision?","authors":"J. Hutchinson, P. Sawyer, J. Walkerdine","doi":"10.1109/SOCCER.2006.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An obvious assumption underpinning the immense interest in service-oriented computing is that it is an inherently Good Thing, by which we mean that robust processes and tools for developing service-based systems will bring benefits for service providers and service consumers. The arguments, in terms of consumer choice and flexibility, are certainly quite convincing. However, in this position paper, we question the nature of the underlying assumption, in a world where requirements are as many and varied as potential users and ask if safeguards are needed to ensure that diversity of provision is maintained.","PeriodicalId":108252,"journal":{"name":"2006 Service-Oriented Computing: Consequences for Engineering Requirements (SOCCER'06 - RE'06 Workshop)","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 Service-Oriented Computing: Consequences for Engineering Requirements (SOCCER'06 - RE'06 Workshop)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOCCER.2006.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

An obvious assumption underpinning the immense interest in service-oriented computing is that it is an inherently Good Thing, by which we mean that robust processes and tools for developing service-based systems will bring benefits for service providers and service consumers. The arguments, in terms of consumer choice and flexibility, are certainly quite convincing. However, in this position paper, we question the nature of the underlying assumption, in a world where requirements are as many and varied as potential users and ask if safeguards are needed to ensure that diversity of provision is maintained.
以服务为中心的主导行业是否有利于提供多元化服务?
支持对面向服务的计算的巨大兴趣的一个明显假设是,它本质上是一件好事,我们的意思是用于开发基于服务的系统的健壮过程和工具将为服务提供者和服务消费者带来好处。就消费者的选择和灵活性而言,这些论点当然是相当有说服力的。然而,在本立场文件中,我们质疑基本假设的性质,在需求与潜在用户一样多且多样的世界中,并询问是否需要保障措施来确保维持提供的多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信